Nitin Bhardwaj +1 moreVsRAM CHANDER +1 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 24 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM
CHANDER
13.07.2026
Present: Ms. Mamta Pandey Ld. Counsel for plaintiffs
with plaintiff no.2.
Defendant in person.
The defendant has produced the documents
executed by the mother of plaintiffs in favour of defendant.
The documents are one agreement to sell, general power of
attorney, affidavit, receipt and possession letter pertaining
to property measuring 50sqyds in Kh. No.85, Village
Ibrahimpur, Delhi. All these documents are notarised
documents.
It is further stated by defendant that a Will was
also executed by mother of plaintiffs in his favour and
which is filed in original in Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Copy
of aforesaid documents has been filed on record. The
originals of the aforesaid except the Will (as the will has not
been produced) have been returned to defendant. The
defendant is directed to produce the original Will on
NDOH.
Copy of aforesaid documents has been
supplied to the plaintiff.
Be put up for further proceedings on
07.09.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/13.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM
CHANDER
13.04.2026
Present: Ms. Mamta Pandey Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Ms. Tahseen Ld. Counsel for defendant.
An application U/o 6 rule 17 CPC has been
made on behalf of plaintiff vide which the plaintiff seeks
drop the relief of declaration and cancellation and seeks to
confine the suit only to the relief of injunction. It is stated
that no WS has been filed on behalf of defendant and as
such the plaintiff is not in knowledge of any documents in
favour of the defendants as the defendants have not
produced any such documents before the police or before
this court.
It is stated in reply on behalf of defendants that
the defendants are in possession of the documents executed
by the mother of plaintiffs. It is further stated that by way
of the amendment, the plaintiffs are changing the nature of
the suit.
Considering the aforesaid submissions, the
defendants are directed to appear in person with the
documents stated to be in their possession with respect to
the suit property.
Be put up for 13.07.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/13.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 21 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ VS. RAM
CHANDER
16.02.2026
Present: Ms. Mamta Pandey Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ms. Tahseen Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant
through VC.
The case is listed for arguments on the
application U/o 6 rule 17 CPC. However, adjournment is
requsted by Ld. Proxy counsel for defendant stating that
mother of main counsel has expired.
At request, be put up for arguments on
13.04.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/16.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 207/23
NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM CHANDER
15.11.2025
Present: None for plaintiff.
Ms Geetika, ld counsel for defendants.
The reply to the application u/o VI Rule 17 CPC has
been filed on behalf of defendants. Copy of the same is stated to
have been supplied.
None has appeared for plaintiff despite repeated
calls.
Be put up for arguments on the aforesaid application
on 16.02.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/15.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 17 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM
CHANDER
23.08.2025
Present: Plaintiff no.2 in person.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant through VC.
Reply to the application of plaintiff U/o 6 rule
17 CPC has not been filed on behalf of defendant. In the
interest of justice, one opportunity is granted to the defendant
for the same.
Be put up for reply and arguments on
15.11.2025.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/23.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM
CHANDER
19.05.2025
Present: Ms. Mamta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
An application U/O 6 R 17 CPC has been made
on behalf of plaintiff. Same is taken on record. Let the copy
of the application be supplied to the defendant.
Defendant is directed to file reply to the
application with advance copy to the opposite party.
Be put up for reply and arguments on the
application U/O 6 R 17 CPC on 23.08.2025.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North Rohini, Courts,Delhi/19.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM
CHANDER
10.12.2024
Present: Ms. Mamta Pandey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
through VC.
None for defendants.
Perusal of record shows that the defendants
have marked their presence through Sh. Anil Kumar,
Advocate on 12.09.2023 and a memo of appearance was
filed on their behalf.
No WS has been filed till date, stipulated period
has already expired, accordingly right of defendant to file
WS stands closed.
It is noted that the present suit has been filed
seeking relief of declaration as well as cancellation of
documents which might have been created /fabricated by
defendants and it has not been specifically averred as to what
is the basis of such claim.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff seeks time to clarify
the same.
Be put up for clarification on 19.03.2025.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North Rohini, Courts,Delhi/10.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM CHANDER
12.09.2023
Present: Ms. Mamta Pandey Ld. counsel for plaintiffs.
None for defendants, despite service.
WS not filed by the defendants till date.
Put up for appearance of defendants for 17.11.2023.
(Rakesh Kumar-II)
JSCC/ASCJ/Gudn. Judge
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi/12.09.2023
At later stage 02:52 PM Sh. Anil Kumar Ld. Counsel for defendants
had appeared and and he filed memo of appearance.
WS is directed to be filed by defendants on or before the next date of
hearing after supplying advance copy to the opposite party.
(Rakesh Kumar-II)
JSCC/ASCJ/Gudn. Judge
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi/12.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 33 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM CHANDER
03.03.2023
Present : Ms. Mamta Pandey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Issue summons for settlement of issues to defendants and notice of the
application under Order XXXIX rule 1 & 2 CPC on filing of PF/RC/Speed Post/AD
for 12.09.2023. Steps be taken within 7 days.
(Rakesh Kumar-II)
JSCC/ASCJ/Gudn. Judge
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi/03.03.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM CHANDER
01.03.2023
Present : Sh. Sunil Pandey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
An application U/o 39 rule 1 &2 CPC filed on behalf of plaintiff today
itself.
Matter be listed for consideration for 03.03.2023.
(Rakesh Kumar-II)
JSCC/ASCJ/Gudn. Judge
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi/01.03.2023.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 207/2023
NITIN BHARDWAJ V/S RAM CHANDER
23.02.2023
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered.
Present : Kuldeep singh Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Put up for consideration on 27.02.2023.
(Rakesh Kumar-II)
JSCC/ASCJ/Gudn. Judge
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi/23.02.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 24
CS SCJ 207/23
NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM CHANDER
07.09.2026
Present : Ms. Shweta, stated to be sister of plaintiff, in person.
None for defendants.
Request for adjournment is made on behalf of plaintiff as the plaintiff is
stated to be unwell. Further, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff is also stated to be not available
today.
On the LDOH, defendants were directed to produce the original Will.
However, they have failed to appear.
Accordingly, all the parties along with their main counsels are directed to
remain present in person on the next date of hearing.
Be adjourned for 02.12.2026.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ (North)
Rohini Courts, Delhi
07.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 24 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM
CHANDER
13.07.2026
Present: Ms. Mamta Pandey Ld. Counsel for plaintiffs
with plaintiff no.2.
Defendant in person.
The defendant has produced the documents
executed by the mother of plaintiffs in favour of defendant.
The documents are one agreement to sell, general power of
attorney, affidavit, receipt and possession letter pertaining
to property measuring 50sqyds in Kh. No.85, Village
Ibrahimpur, Delhi. All these documents are notarised
documents.
It is further stated by defendant that a Will was
also executed by mother of plaintiffs in his favour and
which is filed in original in Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Copy
of aforesaid documents has been filed on record. The
originals of the aforesaid except the Will (as the will has not
been produced) have been returned to defendant. The
defendant is directed to produce the original Will on
NDOH.
Copy of aforesaid documents has been
supplied to the plaintiff.
Be put up for further proceedings on
07.09.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/13.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM
CHANDER
13.04.2026
Present: Ms. Mamta Pandey Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
Ms. Tahseen Ld. Counsel for defendant.
An application U/o 6 rule 17 CPC has been
made on behalf of plaintiff vide which the plaintiff seeks
drop the relief of declaration and cancellation and seeks to
confine the suit only to the relief of injunction. It is stated
that no WS has been filed on behalf of defendant and as
such the plaintiff is not in knowledge of any documents in
favour of the defendants as the defendants have not
produced any such documents before the police or before
this court.
It is stated in reply on behalf of defendants that
the defendants are in possession of the documents executed
by the mother of plaintiffs. It is further stated that by way
of the amendment, the plaintiffs are changing the nature of
the suit.
Considering the aforesaid submissions, the
defendants are directed to appear in person with the
documents stated to be in their possession with respect to
the suit property.
Be put up for 13.07.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/13.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 21 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ VS. RAM
CHANDER
16.02.2026
Present: Ms. Mamta Pandey Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Ms. Tahseen Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant
through VC.
The case is listed for arguments on the
application U/o 6 rule 17 CPC. However, adjournment is
requsted by Ld. Proxy counsel for defendant stating that
mother of main counsel has expired.
At request, be put up for arguments on
13.04.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/16.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 207/23
NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM CHANDER
15.11.2025
Present: None for plaintiff.
Ms Geetika, ld counsel for defendants.
The reply to the application u/o VI Rule 17 CPC has
been filed on behalf of defendants. Copy of the same is stated to
have been supplied.
None has appeared for plaintiff despite repeated
calls.
Be put up for arguments on the aforesaid application
on 16.02.2026.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/15.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 17 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM
CHANDER
23.08.2025
Present: Plaintiff no.2 in person.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant through VC.
Reply to the application of plaintiff U/o 6 rule
17 CPC has not been filed on behalf of defendant. In the
interest of justice, one opportunity is granted to the defendant
for the same.
Be put up for reply and arguments on
15.11.2025.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North, Rohini Courts,Delhi/23.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM
CHANDER
19.05.2025
Present: Ms. Mamta, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
An application U/O 6 R 17 CPC has been made
on behalf of plaintiff. Same is taken on record. Let the copy
of the application be supplied to the defendant.
Defendant is directed to file reply to the
application with advance copy to the opposite party.
Be put up for reply and arguments on the
application U/O 6 R 17 CPC on 23.08.2025.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North Rohini, Courts,Delhi/19.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM
CHANDER
10.12.2024
Present: Ms. Mamta Pandey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
through VC.
None for defendants.
Perusal of record shows that the defendants
have marked their presence through Sh. Anil Kumar,
Advocate on 12.09.2023 and a memo of appearance was
filed on their behalf.
No WS has been filed till date, stipulated period
has already expired, accordingly right of defendant to file
WS stands closed.
It is noted that the present suit has been filed
seeking relief of declaration as well as cancellation of
documents which might have been created /fabricated by
defendants and it has not been specifically averred as to what
is the basis of such claim.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff seeks time to clarify
the same.
Be put up for clarification on 19.03.2025.
(Nitish Kumar Sharma)
JSCC/ASCJ/GUDN. JUDGE
North Rohini, Courts,Delhi/10.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM CHANDER
12.09.2023
Present: Ms. Mamta Pandey Ld. counsel for plaintiffs.
None for defendants, despite service.
WS not filed by the defendants till date.
Put up for appearance of defendants for 17.11.2023.
(Rakesh Kumar-II)
JSCC/ASCJ/Gudn. Judge
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi/12.09.2023
At later stage 02:52 PM Sh. Anil Kumar Ld. Counsel for defendants
had appeared and and he filed memo of appearance.
WS is directed to be filed by defendants on or before the next date of
hearing after supplying advance copy to the opposite party.
(Rakesh Kumar-II)
JSCC/ASCJ/Gudn. Judge
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi/12.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 33 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM CHANDER
03.03.2023
Present : Ms. Mamta Pandey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Issue summons for settlement of issues to defendants and notice of the
application under Order XXXIX rule 1 & 2 CPC on filing of PF/RC/Speed Post/AD
for 12.09.2023. Steps be taken within 7 days.
(Rakesh Kumar-II)
JSCC/ASCJ/Gudn. Judge
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi/03.03.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10 CS SCJ 207/23 NITIN BHARDWAJ Vs. RAM CHANDER
01.03.2023
Present : Sh. Sunil Pandey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
An application U/o 39 rule 1 &2 CPC filed on behalf of plaintiff today
itself.
Matter be listed for consideration for 03.03.2023.
(Rakesh Kumar-II)
JSCC/ASCJ/Gudn. Judge
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi/01.03.2023.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS No. 207/2023
NITIN BHARDWAJ V/S RAM CHANDER
23.02.2023
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered.
Present : Kuldeep singh Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Put up for consideration on 27.02.2023.
(Rakesh Kumar-II)
JSCC/ASCJ/Gudn. Judge
North, Rohini Courts, Delhi/23.02.2023
-- 1 of 1 --