Skip to main content
CS DJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ

MUKESH GAHLOTVsJAI KARAN

CNR DLNT010157532025761-District Judge
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 17 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
863/2025
Registration Date
27 Nov 2025
Next Hearing Date
26 Nov 2026
Case Stage
Misc. cases/purpose

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1MUKESH GAHLOT

    Respondent

    1. 1JAI KARAN

    Acts & Sections

    2
    Mandatory Injuction · Sec 37
    Suit for Recovery · Sec ---

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 28-11-2025
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 15-01-2026
    
    Date: 15-01-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 21-02-2026
    
    Date: 21-02-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Order on Application
    Next Hearing Date: 24-02-2026
    
    Date: 24-02-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 04-04-2026
    
    Date: 04-04-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 13-07-2026
    
    Date: 13-07-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 06-08-2026
    
    Date: 06-08-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose
    Next Hearing Date: 26-11-2026

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 11682/2025
    Filing Date: 26-11-2025
    eFiling Number: ADL20230002992C202500027
    eFiling Date: 24-11-2025
    First Hearing Date: 28th November 2025
    Court Number And Judge: 761-District Judge

    Orders

    16
    Interim Order 8
    06 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 4 CS DJ 863/25
    MUKESH GAHLOT Vs. JAI KARANCS DJ
    06.08.2026
    Present: Sh. Hitesh Kumar & Sh. Jassmiran Singh. Ld.
    Counsel for plaintiff
    Sh. Tarun Dabas (through VC). And Ms. Nikita
    Arora, Ld. Counsel for defendant
    1. WS not filed by defendant. Admittedly the alleged videos
    which are defamatory in nature have been supplied to
    defendant in pendrive. WS if any be filed within stipulated
    period with an advance copy to the opposite party
    2. Replication, if any be filed on or before NDOH with an
    advance copy to the opposite party
    3. Put up for framing of issues on 26.11.2026.
    (Akbar Siddique)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/06.08.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 7Full order available
    13 Jul 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 6 CS DJ 863/25 MUKESH GAHLOT Vs. JAI KARAN 13.07.2026 Present: None for plaintiff. Ms. Nikita Arora and Sh. Ashish Nain Ld. proxy Counsel for defendant 1. In the interest of justice, be deferred for 11.30 AM (Akbar Siddique) DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts, Delhi/13.07.2026 At 11.30AM Present: Sh. Amit Kashyap Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Tarun Dabas Ms. Nikita Arora and Sh. Ashish Nain Ld. Counsels for defendant Defendant (through VC). 1. An…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 6
    04 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 17 CS DJ 863/25 MUKESH GAHLOT Vs. JAI KARAN
    04.04.2026
    Present: Sh. Ravinder Malik (through VC), Sh. Hitesh Kumar
    and Sh. Sujeet Beniwal Ld. Counsel for the
    plaintiff.
    Defendant in person (through VC).
    1. It is submitted by the defendant that he is not able to
    contact his counsel since last three days that is the reason
    no WS is filed till date. Some time is sought. Accordingly,
    WS be filed within the stipulated period as per the law
    with an advance copy to the opposite party.
    2. Interim order to continue till NDOH.
    3. Put up for further proceedings on 13.07.2026
    (Akbar Siddique)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi-04.04.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 5Full order available
    24 Feb 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF SH. AKBAR SIDDIQUE, DISTRICT JUDGE-04, NORTH DISTRICT, ROHINI COURTS, DELHI. CS No.863/2025 MUKESH GAHLOT …… Plaintiff VERSUS JAI KARAN .......Defendant ORDER:24.02.2026 APPLICATION FOR AD-INTERIM EX-PARTE STAY UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 & 2: 1. Vide the present Order, I shall decide the application for Ad- Interim Ex-Parte Stay under Order 39 RULE 1 & 2. 2. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for defamation and recovery…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 4
    24 Feb 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 30 CS DJ 863/25
    MUKESH GAHLOT Vs. JAI KARAN
    24.02.2026
    Present: Sh. Jassimran Deep, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
    Ms. Nikita Arora, Ld. Proxy counsel for the
    defendant.
    Defendant in person (through VC).
    Fresh Vakalatanama filed on behalf of Defendant/Jai
    Karan. Same is taken on record.
    Put up for orders at 04.00 PM
    (Akbar Siddique)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/24.02.2026
    AT 04.09 PM
    Present: Sh. Ravinder Malik (through VC) and Sh.
    Ramakant, Ld. Counsels for the plaintiff.
    Sh. Devender, Ld. counsel for the defendant.
    Defendant in person (through VC)
    Vide my separate order pronounced in the open
    court as the application for ad interim injunction is decided in
    favor of the plaintiff with certain directions to the defendant. The
    plaintiff is directed to supply all the documents along with the
    application u/o 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC to the defendant and the
    defendant will file written statement and reply to application u/o
    39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC with an advance copy to the Ld. Counsel
    for the plaintiff.
    Put up for arguments on application u/o 39 Rule 1
    and 2 CPC on 04.04.2026.
    (Akbar Siddique)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/24.02.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3
    21 Feb 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 11 CS DJ 863 of 25
    MUKESH GAHLOT Vs. JAI KARAN
    21.02.2026
    Present: Sh. Ravinder Malik, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
    Be deferred for 11.00Am
    (Akbar Siddique)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/21.02.2026
    At 11.08 AM
    Present: Sh. Ravinder Malik and Sh. Hitesh, Ld. Counsels
    for the plaintiff.
    Arguments heard on the application u/o 39 Rule 1
    and 2 CPC.
    Put up for orders on 24.02.2026 at 3.30PM.
    (Akbar Siddique)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/21.02.2026
    At 12.10 PM
    Defendant/Jai Karan appears through VC, he is apprised about
    the proceedings and NDOH.
    (Akbar Siddique)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/21.02.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 2
    15 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS DJ 863/25
    MUKESH GAHLOT Vs. JAI KARAN
    15.01.2026
    Present: Sh. Ravinder Malik, Ld Counsel for the plaintiff.
    Summons issued against the defendant through
    registered post has been received back unserved.
    Summons issued to the defendnat through Ld.
    District Judge has not been received back. No report/ affidavit
    has been filed by the plaintiff in respect of the dasti summons.
    Let fresh summons be issued to the defendant on
    filing of PF/RC/speed post within three days, through Ld.
    District Judge concerned, returnable on 21.02.2026.
    Dasti in addition.
    (Ravinder Singh II)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/15.01.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 1
    28 Nov 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS DJ 863/25
    MUKESH GAHLOT Vs. JAI KARAN
    28.11.2025
    Fresh case received by way of assignment. Let it be checked and
    registered.
    Present: Sh Ravinder Malik, Ld Counsel for the plaintiff.
    Heard. Perused.
    Let fresh summons be issued to the defendant on
    filing of PF / RC through Ld District Judge concerned on
    15.01.2026. Dasti, as well.
    Steps be taken within 7 days.
    (Ravinder Singh II)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/28.11.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 8
    06 Aug 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 4 CS DJ 863/25
    MUKESH GAHLOT Vs. JAI KARANCS DJ
    06.08.2026
    Present: Sh. Hitesh Kumar & Sh. Jassmiran Singh. Ld.
    Counsel for plaintiff
    Sh. Tarun Dabas (through VC). And Ms. Nikita
    Arora, Ld. Counsel for defendant
    1. WS not filed by defendant. Admittedly the alleged videos
    which are defamatory in nature have been supplied to
    defendant in pendrive. WS if any be filed within stipulated
    period with an advance copy to the opposite party
    2. Replication, if any be filed on or before NDOH with an
    advance copy to the opposite party
    3. Put up for framing of issues on 26.11.2026.
    (Akbar Siddique)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/06.08.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 7Full order available
    13 Jul 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 6 CS DJ 863/25 MUKESH GAHLOT Vs. JAI KARAN 13.07.2026 Present: None for plaintiff. Ms. Nikita Arora and Sh. Ashish Nain Ld. proxy Counsel for defendant 1. In the interest of justice, be deferred for 11.30 AM (Akbar Siddique) DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts, Delhi/13.07.2026 At 11.30AM Present: Sh. Amit Kashyap Ld. Counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Tarun Dabas Ms. Nikita Arora and Sh. Ashish Nain Ld. Counsels for defendant Defendant (through VC). 1. An…

    Read Full Order
    Order 6
    04 Apr 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 17 CS DJ 863/25 MUKESH GAHLOT Vs. JAI KARAN
    04.04.2026
    Present: Sh. Ravinder Malik (through VC), Sh. Hitesh Kumar
    and Sh. Sujeet Beniwal Ld. Counsel for the
    plaintiff.
    Defendant in person (through VC).
    1. It is submitted by the defendant that he is not able to
    contact his counsel since last three days that is the reason
    no WS is filed till date. Some time is sought. Accordingly,
    WS be filed within the stipulated period as per the law
    with an advance copy to the opposite party.
    2. Interim order to continue till NDOH.
    3. Put up for further proceedings on 13.07.2026
    (Akbar Siddique)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi-04.04.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 5Full order available
    24 Feb 2026

    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF SH. AKBAR SIDDIQUE, DISTRICT JUDGE-04, NORTH DISTRICT, ROHINI COURTS, DELHI. CS No.863/2025 MUKESH GAHLOT …… Plaintiff VERSUS JAI KARAN .......Defendant ORDER:24.02.2026 APPLICATION FOR AD-INTERIM EX-PARTE STAY UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 & 2: 1. Vide the present Order, I shall decide the application for Ad- Interim Ex-Parte Stay under Order 39 RULE 1 & 2. 2. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for defamation and recovery…

    Read Full Order
    Order 4
    24 Feb 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: 30 CS DJ 863/25
    MUKESH GAHLOT Vs. JAI KARAN
    24.02.2026
    Present: Sh. Jassimran Deep, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
    Ms. Nikita Arora, Ld. Proxy counsel for the
    defendant.
    Defendant in person (through VC).
    Fresh Vakalatanama filed on behalf of Defendant/Jai
    Karan. Same is taken on record.
    Put up for orders at 04.00 PM
    (Akbar Siddique)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/24.02.2026
    AT 04.09 PM
    Present: Sh. Ravinder Malik (through VC) and Sh.
    Ramakant, Ld. Counsels for the plaintiff.
    Sh. Devender, Ld. counsel for the defendant.
    Defendant in person (through VC)
    Vide my separate order pronounced in the open
    court as the application for ad interim injunction is decided in
    favor of the plaintiff with certain directions to the defendant. The
    plaintiff is directed to supply all the documents along with the
    application u/o 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC to the defendant and the
    defendant will file written statement and reply to application u/o
    39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC with an advance copy to the Ld. Counsel
    for the plaintiff.
    Put up for arguments on application u/o 39 Rule 1
    and 2 CPC on 04.04.2026.
    (Akbar Siddique)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/24.02.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3
    21 Feb 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
    Pdf Text: 11 CS DJ 863 of 25
    MUKESH GAHLOT Vs. JAI KARAN
    21.02.2026
    Present: Sh. Ravinder Malik, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
    Be deferred for 11.00Am
    (Akbar Siddique)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/21.02.2026
    At 11.08 AM
    Present: Sh. Ravinder Malik and Sh. Hitesh, Ld. Counsels
    for the plaintiff.
    Arguments heard on the application u/o 39 Rule 1
    and 2 CPC.
    Put up for orders on 24.02.2026 at 3.30PM.
    (Akbar Siddique)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/21.02.2026
    At 12.10 PM
    Defendant/Jai Karan appears through VC, he is apprised about
    the proceedings and NDOH.
    (Akbar Siddique)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/21.02.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 2
    15 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS DJ 863/25
    MUKESH GAHLOT Vs. JAI KARAN
    15.01.2026
    Present: Sh. Ravinder Malik, Ld Counsel for the plaintiff.
    Summons issued against the defendant through
    registered post has been received back unserved.
    Summons issued to the defendnat through Ld.
    District Judge has not been received back. No report/ affidavit
    has been filed by the plaintiff in respect of the dasti summons.
    Let fresh summons be issued to the defendant on
    filing of PF/RC/speed post within three days, through Ld.
    District Judge concerned, returnable on 21.02.2026.
    Dasti in addition.
    (Ravinder Singh II)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/15.01.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 1
    28 Nov 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS DJ 863/25
    MUKESH GAHLOT Vs. JAI KARAN
    28.11.2025
    Fresh case received by way of assignment. Let it be checked and
    registered.
    Present: Sh Ravinder Malik, Ld Counsel for the plaintiff.
    Heard. Perused.
    Let fresh summons be issued to the defendant on
    filing of PF / RC through Ld District Judge concerned on
    15.01.2026. Dasti, as well.
    Steps be taken within 7 days.
    (Ravinder Singh II)
    DJ-04, North, Rohini Courts,
    Delhi/28.11.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.