Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 NEERU VS. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 14.05.2024 Present: Sh. Saurabh Kumar Kaushik, counsel for plaintiff. Ms. Dezy Rekha, counsel for defendant. Heard. Perused. Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant. Same be taken on record. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that defendant has encroached upon 25 sq. yds. out of his plot measuring 225 sq. yds. On the other hand counsel for defendant submits that defendant has not encroached even upon…
CS DJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ
NEERUVsRAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU)
CNR DLNT010063802024426-District Judge
Rohini North, District Sessions Court
delhi · Delhi (DL)
PENDING
TrustJury record updated 17 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 349/2024
- Registration Date
- 06 May 2024
- Next Hearing Date
- 07 Jan 2027
- Case Stage
- Final Argument
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Permanent Injuction · Sec 154
Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 07-05-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 14-05-2024 Date: 14-05-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 01-06-2024 Date: 01-06-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 06-06-2024 Date: 06-06-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 03-08-2024 Date: 03-08-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 05-09-2024 Date: 05-09-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 04-12-2024 Date: 04-12-2024 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 01-05-2025 Date: 01-05-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 25-09-2025 Date: 25-09-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 12-02-2026 Date: 12-02-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 09-04-2026 Date: 09-04-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 13-08-2026 Date: 13-08-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Final Argument Next Hearing Date: 07-01-2027
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 4832/2024 Filing Date: 04-05-2024 eFiling Number: ADL20230011188C202400011 eFiling Date: 03-05-2024 First Hearing Date: 07th May 2024 Court Number And Judge: 426-District Judge
Orders
22Interim Order 1113 Aug 2026
13 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 NEERU Vs. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 13.08.2026 Present: Ms. Bharti Gupta, Proxy counsel for Ms. Niyati Sharma, Counsel for plaintiff. Ms. Neha Tiwari, Proxy counsel for Sh. Deepak Singh Thakur, Counsel for defendant. The counsel for the plaintiff is not available. Adjournment sought. Allowed. To come up for arguments on the maintainability of the suit, as per observations dt. 12.02.2026, as last opportunity for the plaintiff on 07.01.2027. (Sidharth Mathur) District Judge-01(N)/Rohini Courts Delhi/13.08.2026/ak -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1009 Apr 2026
09 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 26 CS DJ 349/24 NEERU Vs. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 09.04.2026. Present: Sh. Hardik Malik, proxy Counsel for Ms Niyati Sharma, counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Deepak Thakur, Counsel for the defendant via VC. The counsel for the plaintiff had a medical emergency. Adjournment sought. Allowed. To come up for arguments on the maintainability of the suit, as per the observations dated 12.02.2026, on 13.08.2026. (Sidharth Mathur) District Judge-01(N)/Rohini Courts Delhi/ 09.04.2026(T) -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 912 Feb 2026
12 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 9 CS DJ 349/24 NEERU Vs. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 12.02.2026 Present : Sh. Hardik Malik, proxy cousnel for Sh. Saurabh Kumar, Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Deepak Thakur, counsel for the defendant. The plaintiff is seeking injunction and possession on the basis of being the owner through customary documents. Since the legality of such customary documents has been negated by the Supreme Court, put up for maintainability on 09.04.2026. (Sidharth Mathur) District Judge-01(N)/Rohini Courts Delhi/ 12.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 825 Sept 2025
25 Sept 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 6 CS DJ 349/24 NEERU Vs. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 25.09.2025 Present : Sh. Hardik Malik, Counsel for the plaintiff Sh. Deepak Singh Thakur, counsel for the defendant. List of witnesses alongwith evidence by way of affidavit of the plaintiff filed. Copy for the opposite party placed on record. To come up for PE on 12.02.2026. (Sidharth Mathur) District Judge-01(N)/Rohini Courts Delhi/ 25.09.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 701 May 2025
01 May 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 NEERU VS. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 01.05.2025 Present: Sh. Saurav Kumar Kaushik, counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Deepak Singh Thakur, counsel for defendant (through VC). Ms. Bhawna Sharma, proxy counsel for defendant (physically present in court). Heard. Perused. WS on behalf of defendant is already on record. Counsel for plaintiff submits that no replication is to be filed by plaintiff. Pleadings are complete. Affidavit of admission- denial of documents has been filed on behalf of both the parties. From the pleadings of the parties following issues arise and are accordingly framed :- 1) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to decree for mandatory injunction, as prayed in prayer clause-A & B of plaint ? OPP 2) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to decree of possession of suit property, as prayed for in prayer clause-C of plaint? OPP 3) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to decree of permanent injunction, as prayed for in prayer clause-D of plaint? OPP 4) Relief. OPP No other issue arises or is pressed for. Now to come up for PE on 25.09.2025. (Deepak Dabas) DJ-1(North)/Rohini Courts Delhi/01.05.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 604 Dec 2024
04 Dec 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 NEERU Vs. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 04.12.2024 Present: Sh. Hardik Malk, proxy counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Deepak Singh Thakur, counsel for defendant. Heard. Perused. Adjournment is sought on behalf of plaintiff on the ground that main counsel is not available today. Ld. Counsel for defendant has strongly opposed the same. In the interest of justice, adjournment is granted. Now to come up on 01.05.2025 for purpose fixed. (Deepak Dabas) DJ-1(North)/Rohini Courts Delhi/04.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 505 Sept 2024
05 Sept 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 NEERU VS. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 05.09.2024 Present: Sh. Saurav Kumar Kaushik, counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff. Sh. Deepak Singh Thakur, counsel for defendant with defendant. Heard. Perused. Counsel for plaintiff seeks adjournment for filing replication. Same is granted. Now to come up on 04.12.2024 for completion of pleadings, admission-denial of documents and framing of issues. (Deepak Dabas) DJ-1(North)/Rohini Courts Delhi/05.09.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 403 Aug 2024
03 Aug 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 Neeru Vs. Rajiv Kaushik (Raju) 03.08.2024 Present: Sh. Saurav Kumar Kaushik, Counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff. Sh. Deepak Singh Thakur, counsel for defendant (through VC). Ms. Bhawna Sharma, Proxy Counsel for defendant (Physically present in Court). Heard. Perused. Proxy counsel for defendant has filed WS. Copy supplied. Now to come up on 05.09.2024 for completion of pleadings, admission-denial of documents as well as for framing of issuesand disposal of injunction application. Till next date of hearing, parties are directed to maintain status-quo regarding construction in suit property as well as passage. (Deepak Dabas) District Judge(North)/Rohini Courts Delhi/03.08.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 301 Jun 2024
01 Jun 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 NEERU VS. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 01.06.2024 Present: Sh. Saurav Kumar Kaushik and Ms. Niyati Sharma, counsel(s) for plaintiff. Ms. Komal Verma, counsel for defendant. Sh. Devender Singh, Local Commissioner is also present. Heard. Perused. Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant. Same be taken on record. Report of Local Commissioner is already on record. Copy supplied. Counsel for plaintiff has filed court fees. Same be taken on record. Defendant is directed to appear in person on 06.06.2024. (Deepak Dabas) DJ-1(North)/Rohini Courts Delhi/01.06.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 2Full order available
14 May 2024
Interim Order 107 May 2024
07 May 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 NEERU VS. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 07.05.2024 Fresh suit received on assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Counsel for plaintiff. Heard. Perused. Issue summons of the suit and notice of application u/o 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC to defendant on filing of PF/RC/Speed Post/Courier as well as through approved electronic modes, returnable on 14.05.2024. Steps be taken at the earliest. (Deepak Dabas) DJ-1(North)/Rohini Courts Delhi/07.05.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1113 Aug 2026
13 Aug 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 NEERU Vs. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 13.08.2026 Present: Ms. Bharti Gupta, Proxy counsel for Ms. Niyati Sharma, Counsel for plaintiff. Ms. Neha Tiwari, Proxy counsel for Sh. Deepak Singh Thakur, Counsel for defendant. The counsel for the plaintiff is not available. Adjournment sought. Allowed. To come up for arguments on the maintainability of the suit, as per observations dt. 12.02.2026, as last opportunity for the plaintiff on 07.01.2027. (Sidharth Mathur) District Judge-01(N)/Rohini Courts Delhi/13.08.2026/ak -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1009 Apr 2026
09 Apr 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 26 CS DJ 349/24 NEERU Vs. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 09.04.2026. Present: Sh. Hardik Malik, proxy Counsel for Ms Niyati Sharma, counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Deepak Thakur, Counsel for the defendant via VC. The counsel for the plaintiff had a medical emergency. Adjournment sought. Allowed. To come up for arguments on the maintainability of the suit, as per the observations dated 12.02.2026, on 13.08.2026. (Sidharth Mathur) District Judge-01(N)/Rohini Courts Delhi/ 09.04.2026(T) -- 1 of 1 --
Order 912 Feb 2026
12 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 9 CS DJ 349/24 NEERU Vs. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 12.02.2026 Present : Sh. Hardik Malik, proxy cousnel for Sh. Saurabh Kumar, Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. Deepak Thakur, counsel for the defendant. The plaintiff is seeking injunction and possession on the basis of being the owner through customary documents. Since the legality of such customary documents has been negated by the Supreme Court, put up for maintainability on 09.04.2026. (Sidharth Mathur) District Judge-01(N)/Rohini Courts Delhi/ 12.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 825 Sept 2025
25 Sept 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 6 CS DJ 349/24 NEERU Vs. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 25.09.2025 Present : Sh. Hardik Malik, Counsel for the plaintiff Sh. Deepak Singh Thakur, counsel for the defendant. List of witnesses alongwith evidence by way of affidavit of the plaintiff filed. Copy for the opposite party placed on record. To come up for PE on 12.02.2026. (Sidharth Mathur) District Judge-01(N)/Rohini Courts Delhi/ 25.09.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 701 May 2025
01 May 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 NEERU VS. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 01.05.2025 Present: Sh. Saurav Kumar Kaushik, counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Deepak Singh Thakur, counsel for defendant (through VC). Ms. Bhawna Sharma, proxy counsel for defendant (physically present in court). Heard. Perused. WS on behalf of defendant is already on record. Counsel for plaintiff submits that no replication is to be filed by plaintiff. Pleadings are complete. Affidavit of admission- denial of documents has been filed on behalf of both the parties. From the pleadings of the parties following issues arise and are accordingly framed :- 1) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to decree for mandatory injunction, as prayed in prayer clause-A & B of plaint ? OPP 2) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to decree of possession of suit property, as prayed for in prayer clause-C of plaint? OPP 3) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to decree of permanent injunction, as prayed for in prayer clause-D of plaint? OPP 4) Relief. OPP No other issue arises or is pressed for. Now to come up for PE on 25.09.2025. (Deepak Dabas) DJ-1(North)/Rohini Courts Delhi/01.05.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 604 Dec 2024
04 Dec 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 NEERU Vs. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 04.12.2024 Present: Sh. Hardik Malk, proxy counsel for plaintiff. Sh. Deepak Singh Thakur, counsel for defendant. Heard. Perused. Adjournment is sought on behalf of plaintiff on the ground that main counsel is not available today. Ld. Counsel for defendant has strongly opposed the same. In the interest of justice, adjournment is granted. Now to come up on 01.05.2025 for purpose fixed. (Deepak Dabas) DJ-1(North)/Rohini Courts Delhi/04.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 505 Sept 2024
05 Sept 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 NEERU VS. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 05.09.2024 Present: Sh. Saurav Kumar Kaushik, counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff. Sh. Deepak Singh Thakur, counsel for defendant with defendant. Heard. Perused. Counsel for plaintiff seeks adjournment for filing replication. Same is granted. Now to come up on 04.12.2024 for completion of pleadings, admission-denial of documents and framing of issues. (Deepak Dabas) DJ-1(North)/Rohini Courts Delhi/05.09.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 403 Aug 2024
03 Aug 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 Neeru Vs. Rajiv Kaushik (Raju) 03.08.2024 Present: Sh. Saurav Kumar Kaushik, Counsel for plaintiff with plaintiff. Sh. Deepak Singh Thakur, counsel for defendant (through VC). Ms. Bhawna Sharma, Proxy Counsel for defendant (Physically present in Court). Heard. Perused. Proxy counsel for defendant has filed WS. Copy supplied. Now to come up on 05.09.2024 for completion of pleadings, admission-denial of documents as well as for framing of issuesand disposal of injunction application. Till next date of hearing, parties are directed to maintain status-quo regarding construction in suit property as well as passage. (Deepak Dabas) District Judge(North)/Rohini Courts Delhi/03.08.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 301 Jun 2024
01 Jun 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 NEERU VS. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 01.06.2024 Present: Sh. Saurav Kumar Kaushik and Ms. Niyati Sharma, counsel(s) for plaintiff. Ms. Komal Verma, counsel for defendant. Sh. Devender Singh, Local Commissioner is also present. Heard. Perused. Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant. Same be taken on record. Report of Local Commissioner is already on record. Copy supplied. Counsel for plaintiff has filed court fees. Same be taken on record. Defendant is directed to appear in person on 06.06.2024. (Deepak Dabas) DJ-1(North)/Rohini Courts Delhi/01.06.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 2Full order available
14 May 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 NEERU VS. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 14.05.2024 Present: Sh. Saurabh Kumar Kaushik, counsel for plaintiff. Ms. Dezy Rekha, counsel for defendant. Heard. Perused. Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant. Same be taken on record. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that defendant has encroached upon 25 sq. yds. out of his plot measuring 225 sq. yds. On the other hand counsel for defendant submits that defendant has not encroached even upon…
Order 107 May 2024
07 May 2024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: CS DJ 349/24 NEERU VS. RAJIV KAUSHIK (RAJU) 07.05.2024 Fresh suit received on assignment. It be checked and registered. Present: Counsel for plaintiff. Heard. Perused. Issue summons of the suit and notice of application u/o 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC to defendant on filing of PF/RC/Speed Post/Courier as well as through approved electronic modes, returnable on 14.05.2024. Steps be taken at the earliest. (Deepak Dabas) DJ-1(North)/Rohini Courts Delhi/07.05.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
