Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 20 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 05.05.2026 Present: Sh. S C Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. Sh. H.K Dhariwal, Ld. Counsel for the non- applicant. Mediation is stated to have failed between the parties. An application u/O 7 Rule 14 CPC has been moved on behalf of applicant seeking to place on record certified copy of order dt. 28.05.2025 of Ld. JMFC North East…
BADAL PANWARVsRAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR
TrustJury record updated 19 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 63/2024
- Registration Date
- 25 Nov 2024
- Next Hearing Date
- 05 Nov 2026
- Case Stage
- Order
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
2Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 26-11-2024 Business: f.p. Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 05-12-2024 Date: 05-12-2024 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 07-01-2025 Date: 07-01-2025 Business: Application 7 rule 14 allowed Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 11-02-2025 Date: 11-02-2025 Business: FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 20-03-2025 Date: 20-03-2025 Business: PURPOSE FIXED Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 25-03-2025 Date: 25-03-2025 Business: FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 09-05-2025 Date: 09-05-2025 Business: FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 04-07-2025 Date: 04-07-2025 Business: FP Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 18-08-2025 Date: 18-08-2025 Business: FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Next Purpose: Misc./ Appearance Next Hearing Date: 23-09-2025 Date: 23-09-2025 Business: FURTHER ARGUMENTS Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 06-11-2025 Date: 06-11-2025 Business: FURTHER PROCEEDINGS Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 17-12-2025 Date: 17-12-2025 Business: FOR ARGUMENTS ON APPLICATIONS Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 02-02-2026 Date: 02-02-2026 Business: arguments Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 18-03-2026 Date: 18-03-2026 Business: matter reffer to mediation Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 05-05-2026 Date: 05-05-2026 Business: arguments heard Next Purpose: Order Next Hearing Date: 01-07-2026 Date: 01-07-2026 Business: order Next Purpose: Order Next Hearing Date: 25-08-2026 Date: 25-08-2026 Business: LD. PRESIDING OFFICER IS ON LEAVE TODAY Next Purpose: Order Next Hearing Date: 29-09-2026 Date: 29-09-2026 Reason For Adjournment: Judge on Leave Next Purpose: Order Next Hearing Date: 05-11-2026
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 851/2024 Filing Date: 23-11-2024 eFiling Number: LTN20230004748C202401231 eFiling Date: 23-11-2024 First Hearing Date: 26th November 2024 Court Number And Judge: 72-ACJ/CCJ/ARC
Orders
32Interim Order 1601 Jul 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 17 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 01.07.2026 Present: Sh. Ankit Mehta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. Sh. S.C Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the non applicant. Matter is listed for order on application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Read with Section 151 CPC and on application u/s 151 CPC to set aside judgment dt. 24.05.2023. Arguments have already been heard. List the matter for order on both the applications on 25.08.2026. In the meanwhile both the parties are at liberty to furnish judgment in support of their submissions alongwith written submissions if any. Sh. Pranat Kumar Joshi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/01.07.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1418 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 18.03.2026 Present: Sh. H.K Dhariwal & R. S Rathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. Sh. S. C Kashyap, Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Sh. Ayush Kashyap & Sh. Rahul Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the non-applicant. Sh. Deepak Yadav, Ld. Proxy counsel for non- applicant Rajeev Kumar. Matter is listed for arguments on application u/s 151 CPC. Both the parties have expressed their inclination to settle the matter and request that the matter be referred to mediation centre. Separate referral form is filled to this effect. Accordingly, matter is referred to mediation centre. Both the parties shall appear before the mediation cell on 24.03.2026 at 12.00 pm and for report before this Court on 05.05.2026. Pranat Kumar Joshi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/18.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1302 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 14 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 02.02.2026 Present: Sh. H.K.Dhariwal and R.S.Rathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. Sh. S.C. Kashyap and Sh. Ayush Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for non-applicant. Arguments on application u/s 151 CPC heard. Put up for further arguments on 18.03.2026. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/02.02.2026(SP) -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1217 Dec 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 17 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 17.12.2025 Present: Sh. H.K. Dhariwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. S.C. kashyap, Sh. Ayush Kashyap and Sh. Rahul Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1,2 and 4. Defendant no.3 already ex parte. Reply to the application u/O VII Rule 14 of CPC filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Copy supplied. Reply, if any, be filed on or before the NDOH with advance copy to opposite side atleast one week prior to NDOH. Last and final opportunity is granted to the plaintiff for filing of the applications. Put up for arguments on all pending applications on 02.02.2026. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/17.12.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 1106 Nov 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 19 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 06.11.2025 Lawyers are abstaining from work today. No adverse order is being passed. Present: Sh. S.C. Kashyap, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the applicant (through VC). Ld. Proxy Counsel for non-applicant Badal Pawar. None for non-applicant Rajeev Tomar. Certain judgments have been filed on behalf fo the applicant Umesh Kumar. Taken on record. Put up on 17.12.2025. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/06.11.2025(SP) -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 5 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 23.09.2025 Present: Sh. S.C. Kashyap and Ayush Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the applicant alongwith applicant. Sh. H.K. Dhariwal and Sh. R.S. Rathi, Ld. Counsel for non-applicant Badal Pawar. None for non-applicant Rajeev Tomar. Perusal of the record reveals that there are some applications pending namely application u/s 151 CPC, application u/O 1 Rule 10 CPC, application u/O 39 Rule…
Interim Order 918 Aug 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 7 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 18.08.2025 Present: Sh. S C Kashyap and Sh. Ayush Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. Sh. Atul Sharma, Ld. Counsel for non-applicant namely Rajeev Kumar Tomar. Sh. Priyanshu, Ld. Proxy Counsel for non-applicant namely Badal Panwar. An application under Order VII Rule 14 filed on behalf of the applicant. Copy supplied. Reply has been filed on behalf of the non-applicant Rajeev Tomar on the application of the applicant under Section 151 CPC for setting aside order dated 24.05.2023. Also, reply under Order I Rule 10 filed by non-applicant Badal Panwar. Copy supplied. Let reply from the non-applicant be filed qua the application under Order VII Rule 14 CPC with an advance copy to the opposite side. Last opportunity is granted to the parties to file pending replies, if any, by next date of hearing. Be listed on 23.09.2025. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/18.08.2025(SP) -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 804 Jul 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 7 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 04.07.2025 Lawyers are abstaining from work today accordingly no adverse order are being passed. Present: Applicant in person. Sh. SC Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for applicant (through VC). Non applicant (through VC). No reply filed. Put up for further proceedings on 18.08.2025. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/04.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 709 May 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 10 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 09.05.2025 Present: Sh. R. S. Rathi & Sh. H. K. Dhariwal, Ld. Counsel for the non-applicant. Sh. S. C. Kashyap, Sh. Ayush Kashyap & Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. Time sought by the counsel for the non-applicant for filing reply. Let the reply be filed within 10 working days with an advance copy to the other side. Put up on 04.07.2025 at 12:30 PM. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/09.05.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 9 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 25.03.2025 Present: Sh. S. C. Kashyap and Sh. Ayush Kashyal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. Sh. H. K. Dhariwal, Ld. Counsel for the non-applicant Badal. Non-applicant Rajiv Tomar is absent despite service of notice. Notice to non-applicant Rajiv Tomar received back duly served on the address H. No. 1/3016, Street No. 16, Mandoli Road, Ram Nagar Extension, Shahdara, Delhi.…
Interim Order 520 Mar 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 7 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 20.03.2025 Present: Applicant in person with Ld. Counsel Sh. S. C. Kashyap. None for the non-applicant. Put up for purpose fixed on 25.03.2025. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/20.03.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 411 Feb 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 8 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 11.02.2025 Present: Applicant in person with Ld. Counsel Sh. S. C. Kashyap & Sh. Ayush Kashyap. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has submitted that he wishes to argue more on the point of maintainability. At this stage, an application u/O 7 Rule 14 (3) CPC filed on behalf of applicant for filing additional documents. Put up for further proceedings on 20.03.2025. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/11.02.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 307 Jan 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 12 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 07.01.2025 Present: Sh. S. C. Kashyap & Sh. Ayush Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. An application u/O 7 Rule 14 (3) R/w 151 CPC has been filed on behalf of applicant alongwith affidavit for filing additional documents. Heard. Perusal of the record reveals that the matter is still at the stage of consideration, therefore, no prejudice shall be caused to the non-applicant as no notice has been issued to the non- applicant till date. Also, perusal of the record reveals that the documents are in the nature, which are essential for proper adjudication of the present application. In view of the same, present application stands allowed. The original record has been tagged by the Ahlmad. Perusal of record reveals that applicant is neither plaintiff nor defendant in the original suit. Accordingly, put up for arguments on maintainability on 11.02.2025. ANIMESH BHASKAR MANI TRIPATHI ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/07.01.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 205 Dec 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 13 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 05.12.2024 Present: Sh. S. C. Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the applicant with applicant. On the last date of hearing, the Ahlmad was directed to tag the original record with the present application, however, the same has not been tagged as the Reader, Ahlmad as well as Assistant Ahlmad are on medical leave. Let the application be taken up alongwith original records on next date of hearing. Ahlamd concerned is directed to tag the same for the next date of hearing, without fail. Put up for further proceedings on 07.01.2025. ANIMESH BHASKAR MANI TRIPATHI ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/05.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 126 Nov 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 11 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 26.11.2024 Fresh application received by way of e-filing. It be checked and registered asper rules. Present: Applicant in person with Ld. Counsel Sh. S. C. Kashyap. Application u/O 9 Rule 13 CPC has been filed on behalf of applicant for setting aside the order and judgment dt. 24.05.2023. Let the present application be taken up with the original records. Put up on 05.12.2024. ANIMESH BHASKAR MANI TRIPATHI ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/26.11.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1601 Jul 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 17 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 01.07.2026 Present: Sh. Ankit Mehta, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. Sh. S.C Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the non applicant. Matter is listed for order on application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Read with Section 151 CPC and on application u/s 151 CPC to set aside judgment dt. 24.05.2023. Arguments have already been heard. List the matter for order on both the applications on 25.08.2026. In the meanwhile both the parties are at liberty to furnish judgment in support of their submissions alongwith written submissions if any. Sh. Pranat Kumar Joshi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/01.07.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 20 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 05.05.2026 Present: Sh. S C Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. Sh. H.K Dhariwal, Ld. Counsel for the non- applicant. Mediation is stated to have failed between the parties. An application u/O 7 Rule 14 CPC has been moved on behalf of applicant seeking to place on record certified copy of order dt. 28.05.2025 of Ld. JMFC North East…
Order 1418 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 16 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 18.03.2026 Present: Sh. H.K Dhariwal & R. S Rathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. Sh. S. C Kashyap, Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Sh. Ayush Kashyap & Sh. Rahul Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the non-applicant. Sh. Deepak Yadav, Ld. Proxy counsel for non- applicant Rajeev Kumar. Matter is listed for arguments on application u/s 151 CPC. Both the parties have expressed their inclination to settle the matter and request that the matter be referred to mediation centre. Separate referral form is filled to this effect. Accordingly, matter is referred to mediation centre. Both the parties shall appear before the mediation cell on 24.03.2026 at 12.00 pm and for report before this Court on 05.05.2026. Pranat Kumar Joshi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/18.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1302 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 14 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 02.02.2026 Present: Sh. H.K.Dhariwal and R.S.Rathi, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. Sh. S.C. Kashyap and Sh. Ayush Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for non-applicant. Arguments on application u/s 151 CPC heard. Put up for further arguments on 18.03.2026. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/02.02.2026(SP) -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1217 Dec 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 17 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 17.12.2025 Present: Sh. H.K. Dhariwal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff. Sh. S.C. kashyap, Sh. Ayush Kashyap and Sh. Rahul Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1,2 and 4. Defendant no.3 already ex parte. Reply to the application u/O VII Rule 14 of CPC filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Copy supplied. Reply, if any, be filed on or before the NDOH with advance copy to opposite side atleast one week prior to NDOH. Last and final opportunity is granted to the plaintiff for filing of the applications. Put up for arguments on all pending applications on 02.02.2026. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/17.12.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 1106 Nov 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 19 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 06.11.2025 Lawyers are abstaining from work today. No adverse order is being passed. Present: Sh. S.C. Kashyap, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the applicant (through VC). Ld. Proxy Counsel for non-applicant Badal Pawar. None for non-applicant Rajeev Tomar. Certain judgments have been filed on behalf fo the applicant Umesh Kumar. Taken on record. Put up on 17.12.2025. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/06.11.2025(SP) -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 5 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 23.09.2025 Present: Sh. S.C. Kashyap and Ayush Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the applicant alongwith applicant. Sh. H.K. Dhariwal and Sh. R.S. Rathi, Ld. Counsel for non-applicant Badal Pawar. None for non-applicant Rajeev Tomar. Perusal of the record reveals that there are some applications pending namely application u/s 151 CPC, application u/O 1 Rule 10 CPC, application u/O 39 Rule…
Order 918 Aug 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 7 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 18.08.2025 Present: Sh. S C Kashyap and Sh. Ayush Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. Sh. Atul Sharma, Ld. Counsel for non-applicant namely Rajeev Kumar Tomar. Sh. Priyanshu, Ld. Proxy Counsel for non-applicant namely Badal Panwar. An application under Order VII Rule 14 filed on behalf of the applicant. Copy supplied. Reply has been filed on behalf of the non-applicant Rajeev Tomar on the application of the applicant under Section 151 CPC for setting aside order dated 24.05.2023. Also, reply under Order I Rule 10 filed by non-applicant Badal Panwar. Copy supplied. Let reply from the non-applicant be filed qua the application under Order VII Rule 14 CPC with an advance copy to the opposite side. Last opportunity is granted to the parties to file pending replies, if any, by next date of hearing. Be listed on 23.09.2025. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/18.08.2025(SP) -- 1 of 1 --
Order 804 Jul 2025
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 7 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 04.07.2025 Lawyers are abstaining from work today accordingly no adverse order are being passed. Present: Applicant in person. Sh. SC Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for applicant (through VC). Non applicant (through VC). No reply filed. Put up for further proceedings on 18.08.2025. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/04.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 709 May 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 10 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 09.05.2025 Present: Sh. R. S. Rathi & Sh. H. K. Dhariwal, Ld. Counsel for the non-applicant. Sh. S. C. Kashyap, Sh. Ayush Kashyap & Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. Time sought by the counsel for the non-applicant for filing reply. Let the reply be filed within 10 working days with an advance copy to the other side. Put up on 04.07.2025 at 12:30 PM. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/09.05.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 9 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 25.03.2025 Present: Sh. S. C. Kashyap and Sh. Ayush Kashyal, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. Sh. H. K. Dhariwal, Ld. Counsel for the non-applicant Badal. Non-applicant Rajiv Tomar is absent despite service of notice. Notice to non-applicant Rajiv Tomar received back duly served on the address H. No. 1/3016, Street No. 16, Mandoli Road, Ram Nagar Extension, Shahdara, Delhi.…
Order 520 Mar 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 7 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 20.03.2025 Present: Applicant in person with Ld. Counsel Sh. S. C. Kashyap. None for the non-applicant. Put up for purpose fixed on 25.03.2025. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/20.03.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 411 Feb 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 8 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 11.02.2025 Present: Applicant in person with Ld. Counsel Sh. S. C. Kashyap & Sh. Ayush Kashyap. Ld. Counsel for the applicant has submitted that he wishes to argue more on the point of maintainability. At this stage, an application u/O 7 Rule 14 (3) CPC filed on behalf of applicant for filing additional documents. Put up for further proceedings on 20.03.2025. Animesh Bhaskar Mani Tripathi ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/11.02.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 307 Jan 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 12 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 07.01.2025 Present: Sh. S. C. Kashyap & Sh. Ayush Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the applicant. An application u/O 7 Rule 14 (3) R/w 151 CPC has been filed on behalf of applicant alongwith affidavit for filing additional documents. Heard. Perusal of the record reveals that the matter is still at the stage of consideration, therefore, no prejudice shall be caused to the non-applicant as no notice has been issued to the non- applicant till date. Also, perusal of the record reveals that the documents are in the nature, which are essential for proper adjudication of the present application. In view of the same, present application stands allowed. The original record has been tagged by the Ahlmad. Perusal of record reveals that applicant is neither plaintiff nor defendant in the original suit. Accordingly, put up for arguments on maintainability on 11.02.2025. ANIMESH BHASKAR MANI TRIPATHI ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/07.01.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 205 Dec 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 13 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 05.12.2024 Present: Sh. S. C. Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the applicant with applicant. On the last date of hearing, the Ahlmad was directed to tag the original record with the present application, however, the same has not been tagged as the Reader, Ahlmad as well as Assistant Ahlmad are on medical leave. Let the application be taken up alongwith original records on next date of hearing. Ahlamd concerned is directed to tag the same for the next date of hearing, without fail. Put up for further proceedings on 07.01.2025. ANIMESH BHASKAR MANI TRIPATHI ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/05.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 126 Nov 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 11 MISC SCJ 63/24 BADAL PANWAR Vs. RAJIV KUMAR @ RAJEEV KUMAR TOMAR 26.11.2024 Fresh application received by way of e-filing. It be checked and registered asper rules. Present: Applicant in person with Ld. Counsel Sh. S. C. Kashyap. Application u/O 9 Rule 13 CPC has been filed on behalf of applicant for setting aside the order and judgment dt. 24.05.2023. Let the present application be taken up with the original records. Put up on 05.12.2024. ANIMESH BHASKAR MANI TRIPATHI ACJ-cum-ARC-cum-CCJ North-East/Karkardooma Courts, Delhi/26.11.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
