TrustJury record updated 10 Oct 2026
Not available
Date: 29-07-2024 Business: for further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 06-09-2024 Date: 06-09-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 18-10-2024 Date: 18-10-2024 Business: Heard. Adjourned accordingly Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 06-12-2024 Date: 06-12-2024 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 17-01-2025 Date: 17-01-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 04-04-2025 Date: 04-04-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 11-07-2025 Date: 11-07-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 28-07-2025 Date: 28-07-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 10-10-2025 Date: 10-10-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 19-12-2025 Date: 19-12-2025 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 19-01-2026 Date: 19-01-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 27-02-2026 Date: 27-02-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 08-04-2026 Date: 08-04-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Arguments Next Hearing Date: 29-05-2026 Date: 29-05-2026 Date: 07-08-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 17-09-2026 Date: 17-09-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Arguments Next Hearing Date: 10-10-2026 Date: 10-10-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Arguments Next Hearing Date: 19-12-2026
Filing Number: 3766/2024 Filing Date: 19-07-2024 eFiling Number: ADL20230003356C202400050 eFiling Date: 17-07-2024 First Hearing Date: 29th July 2024 Court Number And Judge: 768-District Judge-05
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CNR NO.: DLND01-005936-2024 4 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 17.09.2026 This court is functioning with only one Stenographer today. Present: Ms. Anushree Rawat, Mr. Ankit Verma (through VC) and Mr. Ramesh Kalsan, Ld. Counsels for DH along with DH, in person. Mr. Ashutosh Tiwari, proxy counsel for LRs of JD (through VC) Reply-cum-disclosure of estate on behalf of LRs of deceased JD to the application u/s 50 (2) r/w Order XXI Rule 41 CPC has been filed on behalf of LRs of the JD, today. Ld. proxy counsel for LRs for JD seeks an adjournment for argue in the present application on the grounds that main counsel is medically unfit to appear in the court, today. As such, to come up on 10.10.2026 for arguments on all the pending applications being application u/s 50 (2) r/w Order XXI Rule 41 CPC, Objections filed on behalf of LRs of deceased JD and application filed on behalf of DH for waiver of cost. (Sakshi Sejwal) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/17.09.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 17 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 07.08.2026 Present: Mr. C Prakash, Ld. Counsel for DH along with Adv. Ankit Verma and Adv. Anushree Rawat. Mr. Shubham, Ld. Proxy Counsel for JD (through VC) Fresh additional Vakalatnama filed on behalf of DH. Taken on record. Ld. Counsel for the DH has informed this court that copy of the reply to the application u/s 50(2) CPC has been received by them earlier in the morning today. Upon inquiry from the Ld. Counsel for the JD, this court has been informed that whilst the reply to the said application has been e-filed, however no physical copy of the same has been filed. Accordingly, Ld. Counsel for JD is directed to positively filed its reply to the said application by the NDOH. Now, to come up for further proceedings on 17.09.2026. (Sakshi Sejwal) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/07.08.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 5 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 08.04.2026 Present: Sh. Ankit Verma, Ld. Counsel for DH. Ms. Rashi, Ld. Counsel for JD through VC. Today Ld. Counsel for DH filed reply to the objection. He further moved an application under Section 50 (2) CPC as well as application seeking waiver of cost. Additional copy of application under Section 50 (2) CPC and reply to the objection is also placed on record and same be released in favour of the JD upon his appearance. Now to come up for arguments on all the pending applications on 29.05.2026. (Anubhav Jain) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/08.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 9 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 27.02.2026 Present: None for DH JD in person. Be awaited for DH for. To come up at 2 PM. (Anubhav Jain) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/27.02.2026 At 12 PM, Sh. Ankit Verma, proxy counsel for DH appeared through VC and stated that the copy of objections is not received by him and that he has approached Nazir, however he was informed that…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 23 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 19.01.2026 Present: Proxy counsel for DH through VC Ld. counsel for JD through VC Proxy counsel appeared through VC stated that main counsel is busy and could not collect the copy of objections so filed by the JD. It clearly goes to show that the delay is on the part of DH. Be that as it may, one last and final opportunity is granted to DH to proceed further with the matter. Now to come up on 27.02.2026. (Anubhav Jain) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/19.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 11 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 19.12.2025 Present: Proxy counsel for JD The present execution was filed on the strength of Judgment dated 26.02.2024, whereby suit of the plaintiff was decreed for an amount of Rs.15 Lakhs along with interest @ 9% p.a. In pursuance of the execution filed, warrants of attachment were issued by this court. Today, counsel for LRs of deceased JD appeared before this court and filed their objections stating that the property sought to be attached is the only dwelling house. He further placed on record an additional copy of the objection. Same be released in favor of DH. Now to come up on 19.01.2026 for reply and final arguments. (Anubhav Jain) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/19.12.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 10 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 10.10.2025 Present: Ms. Mansi Shukla, proxy counsel for DH through VC Sh. Mishal, on behalf of LRs of JD Present execution is filed with respect to Judgment dated 26.02.2024, whereby suit of the plaintiff was decreed for an amount of Rs.15,00,000/- along with interest @ 9 % p.a. Upon execution of warrants of attachment, DH was informed that JD namely Pradeep Kumar Tanwar had already expired. Today, Ld counsel has appeared on behalf of LRs of deceased herein. He has filed copy of Adhar Card of the LRs of the JD namely Mamta Tanwar and Kunal Tanwar. Plaintiff is directed to take appropriate steps in this regard. Now to come up on 19.12.2025. (Anubhav Jain) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/10.10.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 8 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 28.07.2025 Present: Sh. Shrey Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for DH through VC Sh. Mishal Vij, Ld. Counsel for JD through VC As per the report of bailiff, attachment could not be completed. It is stated by counsel for JD that the JD has already expired in the year 2024 and that they were not aware as to the execution proceedings till the bailiff reached at their property. It is further stated that they do not have the copy of the execution petition. On the other hand, Ld. counsel for DH states that JD is well aware of the execution proceedings and they are deliberately delaying the execution. He further states that immovable property of JD be attached. Counsel for the parties are directed to move appropriate application with respect to their averments. Now to come up on 10.10.2025. (Anubhav Jain) District Judge-05, NDD, PHC/ND/28.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR VS PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 11.07.2025 Present: It is stated by Ld. Counsel for the DH that after passing the decree, the JD has expired and that the present execution petition is filed against the LRs of the deceased DH. It is further stated that bailiff approach the property of the LRs of JD in order to attach the moveable properties, however, the LRs does not permit to do so. Ld. Counsel for the DH prayed that immovable property of JD be attached since he has apprehension that the LRs of JD might sell out the property. Heard. Considered. Perused. This court is of the view that prior to executing attachment of immovable property, one more attempt should be made for attachment of moveable properties of deceased JD. In view of the same, let fresh warrants of attachment be issued as per list of properties already filed, on filing of PF. DH is directed to appear before Ld. ACJ on 15.07.2025 and before this court on 28.07.2025. Further, concerned SHO is directed to provide appropriate police help during execution of warrants of attachments. (Anubhav Jain) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/11.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: EX 104/24 Bal Kishan Tanwar Vs. Pradeep Kumar Tanwar 04.04.2025 Present: Ms. Mansi Shukla, Counsel for the DH through VC. Warrant of attachment was not issued as PF not filed. Let fresh warrant of attachment in terms of previous order be issued on filing PF. DH to appear before Ld. ACJ for appointment of bailiff on 17.04.2025 and before this Court on 11.07.2025. (Balwant Rai Bansal) District Judge-05, NDD, PHC/ND/04.04.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Ex. No. 104/24 Bal Kishan Tanwar Vs. Pradeep Kumar Tanwar 17.01.2025 Present: Sh. C. Prakash, Counsel for the DH through VC. Warrant of attachment could not be executed as the court bailiff was on leave. The Counsel for the DH has prayed for issuance of fresh warrant of attachment. Issue fresh warrant of attachment of the movable properties of the JD as per list furnished by the DH to the extent of decreetal amount on filing PF. DH to appear before Ld. ACJ for appointment of bailiff on 27.01.2025 and before this Court on 04.04.2025. (Balwant Rai Bansal) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/17.01.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 06.12.2024 Case received by way of transfer from the Court of Sh. Harvinder Singh Johal, Ld. DJ-02 & Wakf Tribunal, NDD, PHC pursuant to Office Order No.30411-30427/Judl//NDD/PHC/ND of the Ld. Principal District & Sessions Judge, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi. It be checked and registered. Present: Ms. Mansi Shukla, Counsel for the DH None for the JD Warrant of attachment could not be executed as the DH did not appear in Nazarat branch for taking the court bailiff for execution. On request, let fresh warrant of attachment be issued of the movable properties of the JD to the extent of decreetal amount on filing PF. DH to appear before Ld. ACJ on 13.12.2024 and before this court on 17.01.2025. (Balwant Rai Bansal) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/06.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CNR NO.: DLND01-005936-2024 4 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 17.09.2026 This court is functioning with only one Stenographer today. Present: Ms. Anushree Rawat, Mr. Ankit Verma (through VC) and Mr. Ramesh Kalsan, Ld. Counsels for DH along with DH, in person. Mr. Ashutosh Tiwari, proxy counsel for LRs of JD (through VC) Reply-cum-disclosure of estate on behalf of LRs of deceased JD to the application u/s 50 (2) r/w Order XXI Rule 41 CPC has been filed on behalf of LRs of the JD, today. Ld. proxy counsel for LRs for JD seeks an adjournment for argue in the present application on the grounds that main counsel is medically unfit to appear in the court, today. As such, to come up on 10.10.2026 for arguments on all the pending applications being application u/s 50 (2) r/w Order XXI Rule 41 CPC, Objections filed on behalf of LRs of deceased JD and application filed on behalf of DH for waiver of cost. (Sakshi Sejwal) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/17.09.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 17 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 07.08.2026 Present: Mr. C Prakash, Ld. Counsel for DH along with Adv. Ankit Verma and Adv. Anushree Rawat. Mr. Shubham, Ld. Proxy Counsel for JD (through VC) Fresh additional Vakalatnama filed on behalf of DH. Taken on record. Ld. Counsel for the DH has informed this court that copy of the reply to the application u/s 50(2) CPC has been received by them earlier in the morning today. Upon inquiry from the Ld. Counsel for the JD, this court has been informed that whilst the reply to the said application has been e-filed, however no physical copy of the same has been filed. Accordingly, Ld. Counsel for JD is directed to positively filed its reply to the said application by the NDOH. Now, to come up for further proceedings on 17.09.2026. (Sakshi Sejwal) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/07.08.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 5 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 08.04.2026 Present: Sh. Ankit Verma, Ld. Counsel for DH. Ms. Rashi, Ld. Counsel for JD through VC. Today Ld. Counsel for DH filed reply to the objection. He further moved an application under Section 50 (2) CPC as well as application seeking waiver of cost. Additional copy of application under Section 50 (2) CPC and reply to the objection is also placed on record and same be released in favour of the JD upon his appearance. Now to come up for arguments on all the pending applications on 29.05.2026. (Anubhav Jain) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/08.04.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 9 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 27.02.2026 Present: None for DH JD in person. Be awaited for DH for. To come up at 2 PM. (Anubhav Jain) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/27.02.2026 At 12 PM, Sh. Ankit Verma, proxy counsel for DH appeared through VC and stated that the copy of objections is not received by him and that he has approached Nazir, however he was informed that…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 23 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 19.01.2026 Present: Proxy counsel for DH through VC Ld. counsel for JD through VC Proxy counsel appeared through VC stated that main counsel is busy and could not collect the copy of objections so filed by the JD. It clearly goes to show that the delay is on the part of DH. Be that as it may, one last and final opportunity is granted to DH to proceed further with the matter. Now to come up on 27.02.2026. (Anubhav Jain) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/19.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 11 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 19.12.2025 Present: Proxy counsel for JD The present execution was filed on the strength of Judgment dated 26.02.2024, whereby suit of the plaintiff was decreed for an amount of Rs.15 Lakhs along with interest @ 9% p.a. In pursuance of the execution filed, warrants of attachment were issued by this court. Today, counsel for LRs of deceased JD appeared before this court and filed their objections stating that the property sought to be attached is the only dwelling house. He further placed on record an additional copy of the objection. Same be released in favor of DH. Now to come up on 19.01.2026 for reply and final arguments. (Anubhav Jain) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/19.12.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 10 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 10.10.2025 Present: Ms. Mansi Shukla, proxy counsel for DH through VC Sh. Mishal, on behalf of LRs of JD Present execution is filed with respect to Judgment dated 26.02.2024, whereby suit of the plaintiff was decreed for an amount of Rs.15,00,000/- along with interest @ 9 % p.a. Upon execution of warrants of attachment, DH was informed that JD namely Pradeep Kumar Tanwar had already expired. Today, Ld counsel has appeared on behalf of LRs of deceased herein. He has filed copy of Adhar Card of the LRs of the JD namely Mamta Tanwar and Kunal Tanwar. Plaintiff is directed to take appropriate steps in this regard. Now to come up on 19.12.2025. (Anubhav Jain) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/10.10.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 8 EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 28.07.2025 Present: Sh. Shrey Tanwar, Ld. Counsel for DH through VC Sh. Mishal Vij, Ld. Counsel for JD through VC As per the report of bailiff, attachment could not be completed. It is stated by counsel for JD that the JD has already expired in the year 2024 and that they were not aware as to the execution proceedings till the bailiff reached at their property. It is further stated that they do not have the copy of the execution petition. On the other hand, Ld. counsel for DH states that JD is well aware of the execution proceedings and they are deliberately delaying the execution. He further states that immovable property of JD be attached. Counsel for the parties are directed to move appropriate application with respect to their averments. Now to come up on 10.10.2025. (Anubhav Jain) District Judge-05, NDD, PHC/ND/28.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR VS PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 11.07.2025 Present: It is stated by Ld. Counsel for the DH that after passing the decree, the JD has expired and that the present execution petition is filed against the LRs of the deceased DH. It is further stated that bailiff approach the property of the LRs of JD in order to attach the moveable properties, however, the LRs does not permit to do so. Ld. Counsel for the DH prayed that immovable property of JD be attached since he has apprehension that the LRs of JD might sell out the property. Heard. Considered. Perused. This court is of the view that prior to executing attachment of immovable property, one more attempt should be made for attachment of moveable properties of deceased JD. In view of the same, let fresh warrants of attachment be issued as per list of properties already filed, on filing of PF. DH is directed to appear before Ld. ACJ on 15.07.2025 and before this court on 28.07.2025. Further, concerned SHO is directed to provide appropriate police help during execution of warrants of attachments. (Anubhav Jain) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/11.07.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: EX 104/24 Bal Kishan Tanwar Vs. Pradeep Kumar Tanwar 04.04.2025 Present: Ms. Mansi Shukla, Counsel for the DH through VC. Warrant of attachment was not issued as PF not filed. Let fresh warrant of attachment in terms of previous order be issued on filing PF. DH to appear before Ld. ACJ for appointment of bailiff on 17.04.2025 and before this Court on 11.07.2025. (Balwant Rai Bansal) District Judge-05, NDD, PHC/ND/04.04.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Ex. No. 104/24 Bal Kishan Tanwar Vs. Pradeep Kumar Tanwar 17.01.2025 Present: Sh. C. Prakash, Counsel for the DH through VC. Warrant of attachment could not be executed as the court bailiff was on leave. The Counsel for the DH has prayed for issuance of fresh warrant of attachment. Issue fresh warrant of attachment of the movable properties of the JD as per list furnished by the DH to the extent of decreetal amount on filing PF. DH to appear before Ld. ACJ for appointment of bailiff on 27.01.2025 and before this Court on 04.04.2025. (Balwant Rai Bansal) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/17.01.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: EX 104/24 BAL KISHAN TANWAR Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR TANWAR 06.12.2024 Case received by way of transfer from the Court of Sh. Harvinder Singh Johal, Ld. DJ-02 & Wakf Tribunal, NDD, PHC pursuant to Office Order No.30411-30427/Judl//NDD/PHC/ND of the Ld. Principal District & Sessions Judge, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi. It be checked and registered. Present: Ms. Mansi Shukla, Counsel for the DH None for the JD Warrant of attachment could not be executed as the DH did not appear in Nazarat branch for taking the court bailiff for execution. On request, let fresh warrant of attachment be issued of the movable properties of the JD to the extent of decreetal amount on filing PF. DH to appear before Ld. ACJ on 13.12.2024 and before this court on 17.01.2025. (Balwant Rai Bansal) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/06.12.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
