KALYAN SINGHVsBRAHAM PRAKASH

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CA 219/2025
Kalyan Singh Vs. Braham Prakash
16.07.2026
Present: None for appellant.
Sh. M.K. Paswan, Ld. Counsel for respondent/
complainant.
1. None has appeared on behalf of the appellant on the last
date of hearing also.
2. In circumstances, let court notice be issued to the
appellant to appear in person on the next date of hearing.
3. Put up for appearance of appellant and arguments on the
application for condonation of delay on 12.10.2026.
4. At this stage, Ld. Counsel that the respondent/complainant
submits that the respondent Braham Prakash is a senior citizen of 61
years of age.
5. Heard. Considered.
6. Nothing has been filed on record reflecting the age of
respondent/complainant.
7. Ld. Counsel is directed to file the age related documents
of the respondent/complainant on the next date of hearing.
8. Meanwhile, considering the submissions of Ld. Counsel
that the respondent/complainant is a senior citizen, shortest possible
date is given.
9. Relist on 29.08.2026.
10. Earlier date stands cancelled.
(Shefali Barnala Tandon)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC/16.07.2026 (r)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CA No. 219/2025
Kalyan Singh Vs. Braham Prakash
PS - Connaught Place
15.04.2026
File is taken up today as 14.04.2026 was declared ‘Holiday’ on
account of Birth of Dr.Bhim Rao Ambedkar
Present: None for the appellant
Respondent along with Ld. Counsel Sh. N. K. Paswan.
1. In the interest of justice, no adverse order is being passed against
the apepllant.
2. Ld. Counsel for respondent submits that previous cost has not been
paid.
3. Put up for payment of previous cost as well as arguments on
application on condonation of delay 10.07.2026.
(Shefali Barnala Tandon)
ASJ-06 / New Delhi District
Patiala House Court/15.04.2026 (gr)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16 CA 219/2025
Kalyan Singh Vs. Braham Prakash
PS: Connaught Place
CNR No. DLND01-005130-2025
29.08.2026
Present: None for the appellant.
Respondent in person alongwith Sh. N.K. Paswan,
Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
Perusal of the record reveals that on the last date of
hearing also, no one had appeared on behalf of the appellant.
List for appearance of the appellant and arguments
on application seeking condonation of delay.
Issue Court Notice to the appellant for the NDOH. In
case, appellant fails to appear on the NDOH, adverse order shall
be passed.
List on 25.01.2027. Trial Court Record be
requisitioned a day before the next date of hearing.
(Gomati Manocha)
ASJ-04 / New Delhi District
Patiala House Court/29.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CA 219/2025
Kalyan Singh Vs. Braham Prakash
16.07.2026
Present: None for appellant.
Sh. M.K. Paswan, Ld. Counsel for respondent/
complainant.
1. None has appeared on behalf of the appellant on the last
date of hearing also.
2. In circumstances, let court notice be issued to the
appellant to appear in person on the next date of hearing.
3. Put up for appearance of appellant and arguments on the
application for condonation of delay on 12.10.2026.
4. At this stage, Ld. Counsel that the respondent/complainant
submits that the respondent Braham Prakash is a senior citizen of 61
years of age.
5. Heard. Considered.
6. Nothing has been filed on record reflecting the age of
respondent/complainant.
7. Ld. Counsel is directed to file the age related documents
of the respondent/complainant on the next date of hearing.
8. Meanwhile, considering the submissions of Ld. Counsel
that the respondent/complainant is a senior citizen, shortest possible
date is given.
9. Relist on 29.08.2026.
10. Earlier date stands cancelled.
(Shefali Barnala Tandon)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC/16.07.2026 (r)
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CA No. 219/2025
Kalyan Singh Vs. Braham Prakash
PS - Connaught Place
15.04.2026
File is taken up today as 14.04.2026 was declared ‘Holiday’ on
account of Birth of Dr.Bhim Rao Ambedkar
Present: None for the appellant
Respondent along with Ld. Counsel Sh. N. K. Paswan.
1. In the interest of justice, no adverse order is being passed against
the apepllant.
2. Ld. Counsel for respondent submits that previous cost has not been
paid.
3. Put up for payment of previous cost as well as arguments on
application on condonation of delay 10.07.2026.
(Shefali Barnala Tandon)
ASJ-06 / New Delhi District
Patiala House Court/15.04.2026 (gr)
-- 1 of 1 --