Rakesh GuptaVsShobha Thapar

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev / 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
30.04.2026
Present: Sh. Rohit Mehla, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Ms. Shagun Garg, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
At this stage, request is made on behalf of parties for
referring the matter to Mediation Centre, Patiala House Courts, New
Delhi. Heard. Allowed.
Matter is referred to Mediation Centre, Patiala House
Courts, New Delhi for 30.04.2026 at 1.00 pm.
Be awaited for the outcome of settlement, if any.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
30.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev / 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
13.04.2026
Present: Sh. Rohit Mehla, Ld. Counsel for petitioner through
VC.
Ms. Shagun Garg, Ld. Counsel for respondent through
VC.
It is submitted that settlement proceedings are pending
before Ld. JMFC and NDOH is 16.04.2026.
At request, matter is adjourned for further proceedings
on the confirmation of settlement on 30.04.2026.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
13.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev / 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
19.02.2026
Present: Sh. Rohit Mehla, Ld. Proxy Counsel for petitioner.
Ms. Shagun Garg, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that they are
ready to settle both the complaint cases pending before the Ld. Trial
Court after payment of double of the cheque amount involved in
both the cases. It is submitted that payment shall be done within one
week of March, 2026 and thereafter, the application for settlement
shall be moved before the Ld. Trial Court. Heard and considered.
At joint request, matter is adjourned.
Re-list for further proceedings on 16.03.2026.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
19.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev / 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
18.02.2026
Present: Petitioner through VC.
Sh. Kartik Kaushal, Ld. Counsel for petitioner through
VC and Sh. Rohit, Ld. Counsel for petitioner in person.
Respondent in person with Ms. Shagun Garg, Ld.
Counsel for respondent.
After due indulgence of this Court as well as Ld.
Counsels for parties, matter is likely to settle but Ld. Counsel for
petitioner seeks some time to get instructions about the amount to
be paid as a settlement.
Respondent has clarified that he would not be able to
come to the Court. Considering his condition, I am in agreement
that it will not be possible for the respondent to appear time and
again before this Court, therefore, it is upto the petitioner whether
they want to settle the matter or not. In case, no settlement is arrived
at, then this Court shall hear the arguments on application under
section 5 of Limitation Act.
Previous cost has been paid by the respondent. Receipt
of the same be taken on record.
Put up for further proceedings on 19.02.2026.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
18.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
10.02.2026
Present: Sh. Kartik Kaushal, Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
Ms. Shagun Garg, ld. Counsel for respondent.
Cost of Rs. 1,000/- imposed upon revisionist on last date of
hearing deposited. Receipt taken on record.
An application under section 151 CPC seeking waiver of cost
imposed on last date of hearing, moved on behalf of respondent.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for respondent that on the
instructions of respondent, she wants to withdraw application under section 151
CPC.
Submissions heard. Statement of ld. Counsel for respondent is
recorded separately.
Keeping in view the statement of Ld. Counsel for respondent,
application under section 151 CPC stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Adjournment is sought on behalf of respondent to deposit cost
imposed vide order dated 27.11.2025.
Submissions heard. Request is allowed.
Part arguments are heard.
Parties are directed to appear in person before the court on next
date of hearing.
Put up for further arguments on 18.02.2026.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
10.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
10.02.2026
Present: Sh. Kartik Kaushal, Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
Ms. Shagun Garg, ld. Counsel for respondent.
Cost of Rs. 1,000/- imposed upon revisionist on last date of
hearing deposited. Receipt taken on record.
An application under section 151 CPC seeking waiver of cost
imposed on last date of hearing, moved on behalf of respondent.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for respondent that on the
instructions of respondent, she wants to withdraw application under section 151
CPC.
Submissions heard. Statement of ld. Counsel for respondent is
recorded separately.
Keeping in view the statement of Ld. Counsel for respondent,
application under section 151 CPC stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Adjournment is sought on behalf of respondent to deposit cost
imposed vide order dated 27.11.2025.
Submissions heard. Request is allowed.
Part arguments are heard.
Parties are directed to appear in person before the court on next
date of hearing.
Put up for further arguments on 18.02.2026.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
10.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
27.11.2025
Present: Sh. Rohit Mehla, Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
Ms. Shagun Garg, ld. Counsel for respondent.
Matter is fixed for application under section 5 of Limitation
Act.
Adjournment is also sought on behalf of both the parties as
both the parties are willing to settle the matter.
On the last date of hearing, similar submission was put by
the parties and matter was adjourned by the court for settlement.
Hence, considering the conduct of both the parties, no
ground is made out to adjourn the matter but in the interest of justice, matter
is adjourned subject to cost of Rs. 1,000/- each to be deposited in DLSA
(New Delhi). Both parties are directed to deposit the cost and file the
receipts on next date.
Put up for settlement, if any/arguments on 10.02.2026.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
27.11.2025
At 11:45 AM
At this stage, Ms. Shagun Garg, ld. Counsel for respondent has
appeared again and requests that her arguments may be heard today itself but same
cannot be heard as Ld. Counsel for revisionist has already left the court.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
27.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
12.11.2025
Present: Sh. Rohit Kumar, ld. Counsel for petitioner through VC.
Petitioner in person through VC.
Ms. Shagun Garg, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Matter is fixed for arguments on application under section 5
of Limitation Act but it is submitted by both the parties that there are
chances of settlement.
Submissions heard. At request, adjourned.
Put up for further proceedings on 27.11.2025.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
12.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev / 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
25.08.2025
Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
Present: None for revisionist.
None for respondent.
No adverse order is being passed today due to strike of
lawyers.
Re-list for purpose already fixed on 12.11.2025.
(Aparna Swami)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
25.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev No. 287/2024
Praveen Kumar Vs. Shobha Thapar
16.05.2025
Case received by way of transfer. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Kartik, Ld. Counsel for revisionist (through VC).
Ms. Shagun Garg, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Fresh vakalatnama filed by the Ld. Counsel for the
revisionist. Taken on record.
Request for adjournment is made by the Ld. Counsel
for revisionist as being recently engaged.
Request for adjournment is heard and allowed.
Put up for submissions on 25.08.2025.
Previous date fixed in the matter i.e. 07.07.2025
stands cancelled.
(Aparna Swami)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
16.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 284/2024 & 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
22.08.2024
Present: Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Proxy Counsel for Ms. Rhea
Luthra, Ld. Main Counsel for the petitioner.
Respondent is not yet served.
TCR is received.
Notice issued to the respondent is received back
unserved with the report that she was not found traceable at the
given address.
The TCR reflects that the respondent is being
represented through the advocates of TKG Law Associates before
the Ld. Trial Court. Accordingly, the respondent be served
through TKG Law Associates on filing of PF/RC and through
approved courier returnable on 28.10.2024.
TCR be returned and it be requisitioned two days
prior to the said date.
(Dheeraj Mor)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:22.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CR 284/24; & 287/24
Rakesh Gupta vs. Shobha Thapar
20.05.2024
Fresh revision petition is received by way of assignment. It
be checked and registered as per rules.
Present: Ms. Rhea Luthra, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Heard. Case file is carefully perused.
The present revision petition has been filed against
the order dated 13.07.2016 whereby the petitioner along with five
other accused persons were summoned to face trial in the
complaint u/s. 138 NI Act instituted by the respondent.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not aware about the pendency of the complaint
case and he came to know about it in the month of February
2024.
The present revision petition is accompanied with an
application for seeking condonation of delay in filing of the
present revision petition.
Issue notice of the said application and present
revision petition to the respondent on filing of PF/RC as well as
through authorized courier returnable on 22.08.2024.
TCR be summoned for the said date.
(Dheeraj Mor)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:20.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev / 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
13.04.2026
Present: Sh. Rohit Mehla, Ld. Counsel for petitioner through
VC.
Ms. Shagun Garg, Ld. Counsel for respondent through
VC.
It is submitted that settlement proceedings are pending
before Ld. JMFC and NDOH is 16.04.2026.
At request, matter is adjourned for further proceedings
on the confirmation of settlement on 30.04.2026.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
13.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev / 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
19.02.2026
Present: Sh. Rohit Mehla, Ld. Proxy Counsel for petitioner.
Ms. Shagun Garg, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that they are
ready to settle both the complaint cases pending before the Ld. Trial
Court after payment of double of the cheque amount involved in
both the cases. It is submitted that payment shall be done within one
week of March, 2026 and thereafter, the application for settlement
shall be moved before the Ld. Trial Court. Heard and considered.
At joint request, matter is adjourned.
Re-list for further proceedings on 16.03.2026.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
19.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev / 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
18.02.2026
Present: Petitioner through VC.
Sh. Kartik Kaushal, Ld. Counsel for petitioner through
VC and Sh. Rohit, Ld. Counsel for petitioner in person.
Respondent in person with Ms. Shagun Garg, Ld.
Counsel for respondent.
After due indulgence of this Court as well as Ld.
Counsels for parties, matter is likely to settle but Ld. Counsel for
petitioner seeks some time to get instructions about the amount to
be paid as a settlement.
Respondent has clarified that he would not be able to
come to the Court. Considering his condition, I am in agreement
that it will not be possible for the respondent to appear time and
again before this Court, therefore, it is upto the petitioner whether
they want to settle the matter or not. In case, no settlement is arrived
at, then this Court shall hear the arguments on application under
section 5 of Limitation Act.
Previous cost has been paid by the respondent. Receipt
of the same be taken on record.
Put up for further proceedings on 19.02.2026.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
18.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
10.02.2026
Present: Sh. Kartik Kaushal, Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
Ms. Shagun Garg, ld. Counsel for respondent.
Cost of Rs. 1,000/- imposed upon revisionist on last date of
hearing deposited. Receipt taken on record.
An application under section 151 CPC seeking waiver of cost
imposed on last date of hearing, moved on behalf of respondent.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for respondent that on the
instructions of respondent, she wants to withdraw application under section 151
CPC.
Submissions heard. Statement of ld. Counsel for respondent is
recorded separately.
Keeping in view the statement of Ld. Counsel for respondent,
application under section 151 CPC stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Adjournment is sought on behalf of respondent to deposit cost
imposed vide order dated 27.11.2025.
Submissions heard. Request is allowed.
Part arguments are heard.
Parties are directed to appear in person before the court on next
date of hearing.
Put up for further arguments on 18.02.2026.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
10.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
10.02.2026
Present: Sh. Kartik Kaushal, Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
Ms. Shagun Garg, ld. Counsel for respondent.
Cost of Rs. 1,000/- imposed upon revisionist on last date of
hearing deposited. Receipt taken on record.
An application under section 151 CPC seeking waiver of cost
imposed on last date of hearing, moved on behalf of respondent.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for respondent that on the
instructions of respondent, she wants to withdraw application under section 151
CPC.
Submissions heard. Statement of ld. Counsel for respondent is
recorded separately.
Keeping in view the statement of Ld. Counsel for respondent,
application under section 151 CPC stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Adjournment is sought on behalf of respondent to deposit cost
imposed vide order dated 27.11.2025.
Submissions heard. Request is allowed.
Part arguments are heard.
Parties are directed to appear in person before the court on next
date of hearing.
Put up for further arguments on 18.02.2026.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
10.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
27.11.2025
Present: Sh. Rohit Mehla, Ld. Counsel for revisionist.
Ms. Shagun Garg, ld. Counsel for respondent.
Matter is fixed for application under section 5 of Limitation
Act.
Adjournment is also sought on behalf of both the parties as
both the parties are willing to settle the matter.
On the last date of hearing, similar submission was put by
the parties and matter was adjourned by the court for settlement.
Hence, considering the conduct of both the parties, no
ground is made out to adjourn the matter but in the interest of justice, matter
is adjourned subject to cost of Rs. 1,000/- each to be deposited in DLSA
(New Delhi). Both parties are directed to deposit the cost and file the
receipts on next date.
Put up for settlement, if any/arguments on 10.02.2026.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
27.11.2025
At 11:45 AM
At this stage, Ms. Shagun Garg, ld. Counsel for respondent has
appeared again and requests that her arguments may be heard today itself but same
cannot be heard as Ld. Counsel for revisionist has already left the court.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
27.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
12.11.2025
Present: Sh. Rohit Kumar, ld. Counsel for petitioner through VC.
Petitioner in person through VC.
Ms. Shagun Garg, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Matter is fixed for arguments on application under section 5
of Limitation Act but it is submitted by both the parties that there are
chances of settlement.
Submissions heard. At request, adjourned.
Put up for further proceedings on 27.11.2025.
(Dhirendra Rana)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
12.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev / 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
25.08.2025
Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
Present: None for revisionist.
None for respondent.
No adverse order is being passed today due to strike of
lawyers.
Re-list for purpose already fixed on 12.11.2025.
(Aparna Swami)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
25.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Cr Rev No. 287/2024
Praveen Kumar Vs. Shobha Thapar
16.05.2025
Case received by way of transfer. It be checked and
registered.
Present: Sh. Kartik, Ld. Counsel for revisionist (through VC).
Ms. Shagun Garg, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Fresh vakalatnama filed by the Ld. Counsel for the
revisionist. Taken on record.
Request for adjournment is made by the Ld. Counsel
for revisionist as being recently engaged.
Request for adjournment is heard and allowed.
Put up for submissions on 25.08.2025.
Previous date fixed in the matter i.e. 07.07.2025
stands cancelled.
(Aparna Swami)
ASJ-07/PHC/New Delhi
16.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Cr Rev 284/2024 & 287/2024
Rakesh Gupta Vs. Shobha Thapar
22.08.2024
Present: Sh. Pradeep Kumar, Proxy Counsel for Ms. Rhea
Luthra, Ld. Main Counsel for the petitioner.
Respondent is not yet served.
TCR is received.
Notice issued to the respondent is received back
unserved with the report that she was not found traceable at the
given address.
The TCR reflects that the respondent is being
represented through the advocates of TKG Law Associates before
the Ld. Trial Court. Accordingly, the respondent be served
through TKG Law Associates on filing of PF/RC and through
approved courier returnable on 28.10.2024.
TCR be returned and it be requisitioned two days
prior to the said date.
(Dheeraj Mor)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:22.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CR 284/24; & 287/24
Rakesh Gupta vs. Shobha Thapar
20.05.2024
Fresh revision petition is received by way of assignment. It
be checked and registered as per rules.
Present: Ms. Rhea Luthra, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner.
Heard. Case file is carefully perused.
The present revision petition has been filed against
the order dated 13.07.2016 whereby the petitioner along with five
other accused persons were summoned to face trial in the
complaint u/s. 138 NI Act instituted by the respondent.
Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not aware about the pendency of the complaint
case and he came to know about it in the month of February
2024.
The present revision petition is accompanied with an
application for seeking condonation of delay in filing of the
present revision petition.
Issue notice of the said application and present
revision petition to the respondent on filing of PF/RC as well as
through authorized courier returnable on 22.08.2024.
TCR be summoned for the said date.
(Dheeraj Mor)
ASJ-06/NDD/PHC
New Delhi:20.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --