Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No. 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 16.10.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Mr. Vikram Gola, Ld. Counsel for defendants no. 1 and 2. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff that one application u/s 151 of CPC for striking out the defence of the defendant is moved by the plaintiff in between the dates. It is further submitted by Ld. Counsel…
KETKILATA NAYAKVsITISHREE NAYAK +1 more
TrustJury record updated 10 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 97/2025
- Registration Date
- 06 Mar 2025
- Next Hearing Date
- 11 Jan 2027
- Case Stage
- Misc. Arguments
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
3Petitioner
Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 06-03-2025 Business: Summons Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 21-04-2025 Date: 21-04-2025 Business: Application disposed off Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2025 Date: 16-10-2025 Business: Adjourned Next Purpose: FRESH APPLICATION Next Hearing Date: 09-12-2025 Date: 09-12-2025 Reason For Adjournment: Judge on Leave Next Purpose: FRESH APPLICATION Next Hearing Date: 16-12-2025 Date: 16-12-2025 Business: Application allowed Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 20-01-2026 Date: 20-01-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 17-02-2026 Date: 17-02-2026 Business: Adjourned Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 25-03-2026 Date: 25-03-2026 Business: File sent to the Mediation Centre Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 25-05-2026 Date: 25-05-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 24-09-2026 Date: 24-09-2026 Business: fp Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 11-01-2027
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 865/2025 Filing Date: 01-03-2025 eFiling Number: ADL20230005690C202500002 eFiling Date: 28-02-2025 First Hearing Date: 06th March 2025 Court Number And Judge: 13-District Judge-03
Orders
18Interim Order 924 Sept 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 24.09.2026 Present: Sh. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. counsel for plaintiff through VC alongwith SPA holder of plaintiff. Sh. Mohit Kukreja, Ld. counsel for defendants alongwith defendant No.1. Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant. Matter received back unsettled from Mediation Center. It is submitted by ld. counsel for plaintiff that his application u/O 12 Rule 6 of CPC is pending for disposal. Ld. counsel for defendant objected the application stating that the joint family properties situated at Orrisa are not mentioned by plaintiff and plaintiff is deliberately seeking partition of only one property. Ld. counsel for plaintiff is directed to verify if any other property is left to be mentioned in the present suit. Put up for arguments on application u/O 12 Rule 6 of CPC on 11.01.2027. (Meenu Kaushik) District Judge-03 Patiala House Courts, New Delhi 24.09.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 825 May 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 25.05.2026 Present: Ms. Priyanka Pathak, ld. counsel for plaintiff through VC. SPA holder of plaintiff in person through VC. Mr. Vikram Gola, ld. counsel for defendant no.1. Defendant no.1 in person. It is submitted by parties that matter is pending before Mediation centre listed on 19.07.2026. Considering the submissions, put up for confirmation of settlement, if any/further proceedings on 24.09.2026. (Meenu Kaushik) District Judge-03 Patiala House Courts, New Delhi 25.05.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 725 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 25.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with SPA holder of plaintiff. Mr. Vikram Gola, Ld. Counsel for defendant along with defendant. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for both the parties that parties wish to explore the possibility of settlement by way of mediation. At the request made on behalf of both the parties, the matter is referred to Mediation Centre. Parties are directed to appear before the Mediation Centre on 28.03.2026 at 2:00 pm, and for confirmation of settlement between the parties on 25.05.2026. SPA is placed on record by Mrs. Susrita Nayak, given by the plaintiff in her favour. It be taken on record. (Meenu Kaushik) District Judge-03 Patiala House Courts, New Delhi 25.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 617 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No. 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 17.02.2026 Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC. Mr. Nitendra Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant along with defendant in person. Mr. Vikram Bhola, Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC. Adjournment is sought by Ld. Counsel for defendant on the ground that he has to accompany his daughter to the examination center and hence he shall not able to address the arguments today. Heard. Allowed. Pursuant to query, it is submitted by defendant that present suit is filed against her by her mother-in-law and she wishes to settle the dispute with her mother-in-law. It is further submitted by defendant that she is a widow lady and the suit property was purchased by her and her husband in joint name and after demise of her husband, plaintiff/her mother-in-law wants to have a share in her property. Considering the fact that defendant wishes to settle the matter with the plaintiff, plaintiff is directed to appear in person on the next date of hearing. To come up for further proceedings on 25.03.2026. (Meenu Kaushik) District Judge-03 Patiala House Courts, New Delhi 17.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 520 Jan 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No. 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 20.01.2026 Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Mr. Vikram Bhola, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through VC. Replication is filed by the plaintiff in between the dates. Time sought by Ld. Counsel for the defendant to give reply of the application u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC. Heard. Allowed. Put up for reply and arguments on the above- mentioned application on 17.02.2026. (Meenu Kaushik) District Judge-03 Patiala House Courts, New Delhi 20.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 416 Dec 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 16.12.2025 Present: Shri Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. None for defendant. It is submitted by ld. counsel for plaintiff that one application u/O 12 Rule 6 is moved by him in between the dates and notice of the application be issued to the defendant for next date of hearing. Submissions heard. Let notice of the application u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC be issued upon the defendant on filing of PF & RC for date already fixed i.e. 20.01.2026,. (Meenu Kaushik) District Judge-03 Patiala House Courts, New Delhi 16.12.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No.97/25 Ketkilata Nayak Vs. Itishree Nayak 21.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Mr. Vikram Gola, Ld. Counsel for the defendants alongwith defendant no. 1 in person. Vakalatnama is filed by Ld. Counsel for the defendants. He submits that he is appearing also on behalf of defendant no. 2 and will file vakalatnama executed by defendant no. 2, by the next date of hearing. He…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No.97/25 Ketakilata Nayak Vs. Itishree Nayak and Anr. 06.03.2025 Fresh suit is received. It be checked and registered. Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Record is perused. Issue summons of the suit for settlement of issues as well as notice of application u/o XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for service upon the defendants through all permissible modes on filing of PF and RC…
Order 924 Sept 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 24.09.2026 Present: Sh. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. counsel for plaintiff through VC alongwith SPA holder of plaintiff. Sh. Mohit Kukreja, Ld. counsel for defendants alongwith defendant No.1. Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant. Matter received back unsettled from Mediation Center. It is submitted by ld. counsel for plaintiff that his application u/O 12 Rule 6 of CPC is pending for disposal. Ld. counsel for defendant objected the application stating that the joint family properties situated at Orrisa are not mentioned by plaintiff and plaintiff is deliberately seeking partition of only one property. Ld. counsel for plaintiff is directed to verify if any other property is left to be mentioned in the present suit. Put up for arguments on application u/O 12 Rule 6 of CPC on 11.01.2027. (Meenu Kaushik) District Judge-03 Patiala House Courts, New Delhi 24.09.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 825 May 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 25.05.2026 Present: Ms. Priyanka Pathak, ld. counsel for plaintiff through VC. SPA holder of plaintiff in person through VC. Mr. Vikram Gola, ld. counsel for defendant no.1. Defendant no.1 in person. It is submitted by parties that matter is pending before Mediation centre listed on 19.07.2026. Considering the submissions, put up for confirmation of settlement, if any/further proceedings on 24.09.2026. (Meenu Kaushik) District Judge-03 Patiala House Courts, New Delhi 25.05.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 725 Mar 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 25.03.2026 Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with SPA holder of plaintiff. Mr. Vikram Gola, Ld. Counsel for defendant along with defendant. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for both the parties that parties wish to explore the possibility of settlement by way of mediation. At the request made on behalf of both the parties, the matter is referred to Mediation Centre. Parties are directed to appear before the Mediation Centre on 28.03.2026 at 2:00 pm, and for confirmation of settlement between the parties on 25.05.2026. SPA is placed on record by Mrs. Susrita Nayak, given by the plaintiff in her favour. It be taken on record. (Meenu Kaushik) District Judge-03 Patiala House Courts, New Delhi 25.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 617 Feb 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No. 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 17.02.2026 Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC. Mr. Nitendra Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for defendant along with defendant in person. Mr. Vikram Bhola, Ld. Counsel for defendant through VC. Adjournment is sought by Ld. Counsel for defendant on the ground that he has to accompany his daughter to the examination center and hence he shall not able to address the arguments today. Heard. Allowed. Pursuant to query, it is submitted by defendant that present suit is filed against her by her mother-in-law and she wishes to settle the dispute with her mother-in-law. It is further submitted by defendant that she is a widow lady and the suit property was purchased by her and her husband in joint name and after demise of her husband, plaintiff/her mother-in-law wants to have a share in her property. Considering the fact that defendant wishes to settle the matter with the plaintiff, plaintiff is directed to appear in person on the next date of hearing. To come up for further proceedings on 25.03.2026. (Meenu Kaushik) District Judge-03 Patiala House Courts, New Delhi 17.02.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 520 Jan 2026
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No. 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 20.01.2026 Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Mr. Vikram Bhola, Ld. Counsel for the defendant through VC. Replication is filed by the plaintiff in between the dates. Time sought by Ld. Counsel for the defendant to give reply of the application u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC. Heard. Allowed. Put up for reply and arguments on the above- mentioned application on 17.02.2026. (Meenu Kaushik) District Judge-03 Patiala House Courts, New Delhi 20.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 416 Dec 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 16.12.2025 Present: Shri Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. None for defendant. It is submitted by ld. counsel for plaintiff that one application u/O 12 Rule 6 is moved by him in between the dates and notice of the application be issued to the defendant for next date of hearing. Submissions heard. Let notice of the application u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC be issued upon the defendant on filing of PF & RC for date already fixed i.e. 20.01.2026,. (Meenu Kaushik) District Judge-03 Patiala House Courts, New Delhi 16.12.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No. 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 16.10.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Mr. Vikram Gola, Ld. Counsel for defendants no. 1 and 2. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff that one application u/s 151 of CPC for striking out the defence of the defendant is moved by the plaintiff in between the dates. It is further submitted by Ld. Counsel…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No.97/25 Ketkilata Nayak Vs. Itishree Nayak 21.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Mr. Vikram Gola, Ld. Counsel for the defendants alongwith defendant no. 1 in person. Vakalatnama is filed by Ld. Counsel for the defendants. He submits that he is appearing also on behalf of defendant no. 2 and will file vakalatnama executed by defendant no. 2, by the next date of hearing. He…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No.97/25 Ketakilata Nayak Vs. Itishree Nayak and Anr. 06.03.2025 Fresh suit is received. It be checked and registered. Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Record is perused. Issue summons of the suit for settlement of issues as well as notice of application u/o XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for service upon the defendants through all permissible modes on filing of PF and RC…
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
