Skip to main content
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ

KETKILATA NAYAKVsITISHREE NAYAK +1 more

CNR DLND01001433202513-District Judge-03
PENDING

TrustJury record updated 10 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
97/2025
Registration Date
06 Mar 2025
Next Hearing Date
11 Jan 2027
Case Stage
Misc. Arguments

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    3

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Partition · Sec 84

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 06-03-2025
    Business: Summons
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases
    Next Hearing Date: 21-04-2025
    
    Date: 21-04-2025
    Business: Application disposed off
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases
    Next Hearing Date: 16-10-2025
    
    Date: 16-10-2025
    Business: Adjourned
    Next Purpose: FRESH APPLICATION
    Next Hearing Date: 09-12-2025
    
    Date: 09-12-2025
    Reason For Adjournment: Judge on Leave
    Next Purpose: FRESH APPLICATION
    Next Hearing Date: 16-12-2025
    
    Date: 16-12-2025
    Business: Application allowed
    Next Purpose: Misc. cases
    Next Hearing Date: 20-01-2026
    
    Date: 20-01-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 17-02-2026
    
    Date: 17-02-2026
    Business: Adjourned
    Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 25-03-2026
    
    Date: 25-03-2026
    Business: File sent to the Mediation Centre
    Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 25-05-2026
    
    Date: 25-05-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 24-09-2026
    
    Date: 24-09-2026
    Business: fp
    Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments
    Next Hearing Date: 11-01-2027

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 865/2025
    Filing Date: 01-03-2025
    eFiling Number: ADL20230005690C202500002
    eFiling Date: 28-02-2025
    First Hearing Date: 06th March 2025
    Court Number And Judge: 13-District Judge-03

    Orders

    18
    Interim Order 9
    24 Sept 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS 97/25
    KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK
    24.09.2026
    Present: Sh. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. counsel for plaintiff
    through VC alongwith SPA holder of plaintiff.
    Sh. Mohit Kukreja, Ld. counsel for defendants
    alongwith defendant No.1.
    Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant.
    Matter received back unsettled from Mediation
    Center.
    It is submitted by ld. counsel for plaintiff that his
    application u/O 12 Rule 6 of CPC is pending for disposal. Ld.
    counsel for defendant objected the application stating that the
    joint family properties situated at Orrisa are not mentioned by
    plaintiff and plaintiff is deliberately seeking partition of only one
    property. Ld. counsel for plaintiff is directed to verify if any
    other property is left to be mentioned in the present suit.
    Put up for arguments on application u/O 12 Rule 6
    of CPC on 11.01.2027.
    (Meenu Kaushik)
    District Judge-03
    Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
    24.09.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 8
    25 May 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS 97/25
    KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK
    25.05.2026
    Present: Ms. Priyanka Pathak, ld. counsel for plaintiff
    through VC.
    SPA holder of plaintiff in person through VC.
    Mr. Vikram Gola, ld. counsel for defendant no.1.
    Defendant no.1 in person.
    It is submitted by parties that matter is pending
    before Mediation centre listed on 19.07.2026.
    Considering the submissions, put up for
    confirmation of settlement, if any/further proceedings on
    24.09.2026.
    (Meenu Kaushik)
    District Judge-03
    Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
    25.05.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 7
    25 Mar 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS 97/25
    KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK
    25.03.2026
    Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
    along with SPA holder of plaintiff.
    Mr. Vikram Gola, Ld. Counsel for defendant along
    with defendant.
    It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for both the parties
    that parties wish to explore the possibility of settlement by way
    of mediation.
    At the request made on behalf of both the parties, the
    matter is referred to Mediation Centre.
    Parties are directed to appear before the Mediation
    Centre on 28.03.2026 at 2:00 pm, and for confirmation of
    settlement between the parties on 25.05.2026.
    SPA is placed on record by Mrs. Susrita Nayak,
    given by the plaintiff in her favour. It be taken on record.
    (Meenu Kaushik)
    District Judge-03
    Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
    25.03.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 6
    17 Feb 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS No. 97/25
    KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK
    17.02.2026
    Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
    through VC.
    Mr. Nitendra Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for
    defendant along with defendant in person.
    Mr. Vikram Bhola, Ld. Counsel for defendant
    through VC.
    Adjournment is sought by Ld. Counsel for defendant
    on the ground that he has to accompany his daughter to the
    examination center and hence he shall not able to address the
    arguments today. Heard. Allowed.
    Pursuant to query, it is submitted by defendant that
    present suit is filed against her by her mother-in-law and she
    wishes to settle the dispute with her mother-in-law. It is further
    submitted by defendant that she is a widow lady and the suit
    property was purchased by her and her husband in joint name and
    after demise of her husband, plaintiff/her mother-in-law wants to
    have a share in her property. Considering the fact that defendant
    wishes to settle the matter with the plaintiff, plaintiff is directed
    to appear in person on the next date of hearing.
    To come up for further proceedings on 25.03.2026.
    (Meenu Kaushik)
    District Judge-03
    Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
    17.02.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 5
    20 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS No. 97/25
    KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK
    20.01.2026
    Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the
    plaintiff through VC.
    Mr. Vikram Bhola, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
    through VC.
    Replication is filed by the plaintiff in between the
    dates.
    Time sought by Ld. Counsel for the defendant to
    give reply of the application u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC.
    Heard. Allowed.
    Put up for reply and arguments on the above-
    mentioned application on 17.02.2026.
    (Meenu Kaushik)
    District Judge-03
    Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
    20.01.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 4
    16 Dec 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS 97/25
    KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK
    16.12.2025
    Present: Shri Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the
    plaintiff through VC.
    None for defendant.
    It is submitted by ld. counsel for plaintiff that one
    application u/O 12 Rule 6 is moved by him in between the dates
    and notice of the application be issued to the defendant for next
    date of hearing. Submissions heard.
    Let notice of the application u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC be
    issued upon the defendant on filing of PF & RC for date already
    fixed i.e. 20.01.2026,.
    (Meenu Kaushik)
    District Judge-03
    Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
    16.12.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Interim Order 3Full order available
    16 Oct 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No. 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 16.10.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Mr. Vikram Gola, Ld. Counsel for defendants no. 1 and 2. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff that one application u/s 151 of CPC for striking out the defence of the defendant is moved by the plaintiff in between the dates. It is further submitted by Ld. Counsel…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 2Full order available
    21 Apr 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No.97/25 Ketkilata Nayak Vs. Itishree Nayak 21.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Mr. Vikram Gola, Ld. Counsel for the defendants alongwith defendant no. 1 in person. Vakalatnama is filed by Ld. Counsel for the defendants. He submits that he is appearing also on behalf of defendant no. 2 and will file vakalatnama executed by defendant no. 2, by the next date of hearing. He…

    Read Full Order
    Interim Order 1Full order available
    06 Mar 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No.97/25 Ketakilata Nayak Vs. Itishree Nayak and Anr. 06.03.2025 Fresh suit is received. It be checked and registered. Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Record is perused. Issue summons of the suit for settlement of issues as well as notice of application u/o XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for service upon the defendants through all permissible modes on filing of PF and RC…

    Read Full Order
    Order 9
    24 Sept 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS 97/25
    KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK
    24.09.2026
    Present: Sh. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. counsel for plaintiff
    through VC alongwith SPA holder of plaintiff.
    Sh. Mohit Kukreja, Ld. counsel for defendants
    alongwith defendant No.1.
    Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of defendant.
    Matter received back unsettled from Mediation
    Center.
    It is submitted by ld. counsel for plaintiff that his
    application u/O 12 Rule 6 of CPC is pending for disposal. Ld.
    counsel for defendant objected the application stating that the
    joint family properties situated at Orrisa are not mentioned by
    plaintiff and plaintiff is deliberately seeking partition of only one
    property. Ld. counsel for plaintiff is directed to verify if any
    other property is left to be mentioned in the present suit.
    Put up for arguments on application u/O 12 Rule 6
    of CPC on 11.01.2027.
    (Meenu Kaushik)
    District Judge-03
    Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
    24.09.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 8
    25 May 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS 97/25
    KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK
    25.05.2026
    Present: Ms. Priyanka Pathak, ld. counsel for plaintiff
    through VC.
    SPA holder of plaintiff in person through VC.
    Mr. Vikram Gola, ld. counsel for defendant no.1.
    Defendant no.1 in person.
    It is submitted by parties that matter is pending
    before Mediation centre listed on 19.07.2026.
    Considering the submissions, put up for
    confirmation of settlement, if any/further proceedings on
    24.09.2026.
    (Meenu Kaushik)
    District Judge-03
    Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
    25.05.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 7
    25 Mar 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS 97/25
    KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK
    25.03.2026
    Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
    along with SPA holder of plaintiff.
    Mr. Vikram Gola, Ld. Counsel for defendant along
    with defendant.
    It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for both the parties
    that parties wish to explore the possibility of settlement by way
    of mediation.
    At the request made on behalf of both the parties, the
    matter is referred to Mediation Centre.
    Parties are directed to appear before the Mediation
    Centre on 28.03.2026 at 2:00 pm, and for confirmation of
    settlement between the parties on 25.05.2026.
    SPA is placed on record by Mrs. Susrita Nayak,
    given by the plaintiff in her favour. It be taken on record.
    (Meenu Kaushik)
    District Judge-03
    Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
    25.03.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 6
    17 Feb 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS No. 97/25
    KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK
    17.02.2026
    Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
    through VC.
    Mr. Nitendra Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for
    defendant along with defendant in person.
    Mr. Vikram Bhola, Ld. Counsel for defendant
    through VC.
    Adjournment is sought by Ld. Counsel for defendant
    on the ground that he has to accompany his daughter to the
    examination center and hence he shall not able to address the
    arguments today. Heard. Allowed.
    Pursuant to query, it is submitted by defendant that
    present suit is filed against her by her mother-in-law and she
    wishes to settle the dispute with her mother-in-law. It is further
    submitted by defendant that she is a widow lady and the suit
    property was purchased by her and her husband in joint name and
    after demise of her husband, plaintiff/her mother-in-law wants to
    have a share in her property. Considering the fact that defendant
    wishes to settle the matter with the plaintiff, plaintiff is directed
    to appear in person on the next date of hearing.
    To come up for further proceedings on 25.03.2026.
    (Meenu Kaushik)
    District Judge-03
    Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
    17.02.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 5
    20 Jan 2026
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS No. 97/25
    KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK
    20.01.2026
    Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the
    plaintiff through VC.
    Mr. Vikram Bhola, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
    through VC.
    Replication is filed by the plaintiff in between the
    dates.
    Time sought by Ld. Counsel for the defendant to
    give reply of the application u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC.
    Heard. Allowed.
    Put up for reply and arguments on the above-
    mentioned application on 17.02.2026.
    (Meenu Kaushik)
    District Judge-03
    Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
    20.01.2026
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 4
    16 Dec 2025
    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
    Pdf Text: CS 97/25
    KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK
    16.12.2025
    Present: Shri Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the
    plaintiff through VC.
    None for defendant.
    It is submitted by ld. counsel for plaintiff that one
    application u/O 12 Rule 6 is moved by him in between the dates
    and notice of the application be issued to the defendant for next
    date of hearing. Submissions heard.
    Let notice of the application u/O 12 Rule 6 CPC be
    issued upon the defendant on filing of PF & RC for date already
    fixed i.e. 20.01.2026,.
    (Meenu Kaushik)
    District Judge-03
    Patiala House Courts, New Delhi
    16.12.2025
    -- 1 of 1 --
    Order 3Full order available
    16 Oct 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No. 97/25 KETKILATA NAYAK Vs. ITISHREE NAYAK 16.10.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Mr. Vikram Gola, Ld. Counsel for defendants no. 1 and 2. It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff that one application u/s 151 of CPC for striking out the defence of the defendant is moved by the plaintiff in between the dates. It is further submitted by Ld. Counsel…

    Read Full Order
    Order 2Full order available
    21 Apr 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No.97/25 Ketkilata Nayak Vs. Itishree Nayak 21.04.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Mr. Vikram Gola, Ld. Counsel for the defendants alongwith defendant no. 1 in person. Vakalatnama is filed by Ld. Counsel for the defendants. He submits that he is appearing also on behalf of defendant no. 2 and will file vakalatnama executed by defendant no. 2, by the next date of hearing. He…

    Read Full Order
    Order 1Full order available
    06 Mar 2025

    Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: CS No.97/25 Ketakilata Nayak Vs. Itishree Nayak and Anr. 06.03.2025 Fresh suit is received. It be checked and registered. Present: Mr. Vinay Kumar Pathak, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC. Record is perused. Issue summons of the suit for settlement of issues as well as notice of application u/o XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC for service upon the defendants through all permissible modes on filing of PF and RC…

    Read Full Order

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.