Full Order Text
Order 5 · 04 Jun 2025 · CNR DLND010010622024
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: PC 5/24 REKHA UPRETI Vs. STATE OF DELHI 04.06.2025 Present: Sh Dinesh Singh Choudhary, counsel for the petitioner None for the respondent no.1 Respondent no.2 has already given NOC The notice under order 16 Rule 12 CPC is served upon the Manager, Canara Bank, Sansad Marg, New Delhi. None is present on behalf of the Manager, Canara Bank. The notice is served upon the SDM, Ghaziabad through Asstt. Nazir on 06.05.2025. No report is filed nor anyone is present. Be awaited. (Balwant Rai Bansal) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/04.06.2025 At 12.45 pm Present: As above None is appearing for Manager, Canara Bank, Sansad Marg despite service of the notice under Order 16 rule 12 CPC to show cause why the fine should not be imposed to be deducted from his salary. It implies that he has nothing to say in response to the above notice. Accordingly, a fine of Rs. 500/- is imposed upon the Manager, Canara Bank, Sansad Marg to be -- 1 of 2 -- deducted from his salary. Let the warrant of attachment to the extent of fine amount of Rs. 500/- be sent to the DDO/concerned Accounts officer of the Canara Bank, Sansad Marg, New Delhi for deducting the amount of Rs. 500/- from the salary of the Manager, Canara Bank, Sansad Marg and to remit the same to this court. Bailable warrants be also issued against him in the sum of Rs. 5000/- with one surety of like amount to secure his presence for producing the summoned record. The notice under Order 16 Rule 12 CPC be issued to the SDM, Sadar, Collectorate Office, Rajnagar Dist. Center Ghaziabad that why the fine should not be imposed on him for not producing the valuation report despite service of the notice issued by this court. Dasti notice be given to the petitioner for serving upon the concerned SDM. Put up on 08.09.2025. (Balwant Rai Bansal) District Judge -05, NDD, PHC/ND/04.06.2025 -- 2 of 2 --