Canara BankVsVishnu Keshan +1 more

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4. Civ Suit 937/2024
Canara Bank Vs. Vishnu Keshan
02.02.2026
Present: Sh. Ayush Badhana, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Summons issued to defendant no. 1 have been
received back served via whatsapp as well as e-mail on
23.01.2026.
Summons issued to defendant no. 2 through ordinary
mode have been received back unserved with the report that the
neighbour informed the process server that defendant no. 2 has
sold the premises and moved to an unknown location 5-6 years
ago.
Summons issued to defendant no. 2 via speed post
has been received back with the report ‘refused’.
In view of the above reports, defendant no. 1 is
deemed to be duly served on 23.01.2026. However, the plaintiff
is directed to verify and file fresh address of defendant no. 2, if
needed on or before the NDOH.
Accordingly, be put up for appearance of defendant
no. 1 / further proceedings on 04.05.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
02.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11 Civ Suit 937/24
Canara Bank Vs. Vishnu Keshan
10.11.2025
Present: Ms. Eshu Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Summons issued to defendant no. 1 have been
received back unserved with the report that the defendant left the
premises one year ago and moved to an unknown place. Further,
as per the report, the owner of the property provided the process
server with defendant no. 1’s wife’s number who was called. She
informed that defendant no. 1 has gone to his village for Chhatt
Pooja.
In view of the report, let summons be issued to
defendant no. 1 on filing of PF only through all permissible
electronic modes including whatsapp on mobile number
8744025007 in addition to the contact numbers already available,
returnable for the NDOH.
Further, let summons be issued to the defendant no.
2 on filing of PF / RC / through all prescribed modes including
electronic mode returnable for NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 02.02.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
10.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10 Civ Suit 937/24
Canara Bank Vs. Vishnu Keshan
18.08.2025
Present: Sh. Ankur Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through V/C.
Original postal receipts alongwith tracking reports
have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Taken on record.
As per the tracking report, the summons sent on
S-99, 4th Floor Sundar Block, Shakarpur, Delhi-92 were refused.
However, as per the process server’s report, the defendant was
not found to be living at the said address.
In view of the conflicting reports, it is considered fit
to issue fresh summons to the defendant only on the aforesaid
address once again.
Accordingly, let fresh summons be issued to the
defendant only on the aforesaid address through all prescribed
modes including electronic mode on filing of PF / RC returnable
for NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 10.11.2025.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
18.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 5 Civ Suit 937/24
Canara Bank Vs. Vishnu Keshan
CNR No.DLET030015292024
10.08.2026
Present: Sh. Ayush Badhana, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Defendant no. 1 is ex-parte vide order dated
04.05.2026.
Defendant no. 2 could not be served by way of
publication as steps were not taken. Ld. Proxy counsel for the
plaintiff submits that steps could not be taken due to a
miscommunication and requests for another opportunity to be
granted.
In view of the above submission and in the interest
of justice, let defendant no. 2 be served by way of publication in
terms of previous order, upon taking steps, returnable for the
NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 16.11.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
10.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4. Civ Suit 937/2024
Canara Bank Vs. Vishnu Keshan
02.02.2026
Present: Sh. Ayush Badhana, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Summons issued to defendant no. 1 have been
received back served via whatsapp as well as e-mail on
23.01.2026.
Summons issued to defendant no. 2 through ordinary
mode have been received back unserved with the report that the
neighbour informed the process server that defendant no. 2 has
sold the premises and moved to an unknown location 5-6 years
ago.
Summons issued to defendant no. 2 via speed post
has been received back with the report ‘refused’.
In view of the above reports, defendant no. 1 is
deemed to be duly served on 23.01.2026. However, the plaintiff
is directed to verify and file fresh address of defendant no. 2, if
needed on or before the NDOH.
Accordingly, be put up for appearance of defendant
no. 1 / further proceedings on 04.05.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
02.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11 Civ Suit 937/24
Canara Bank Vs. Vishnu Keshan
10.11.2025
Present: Ms. Eshu Chaudhary, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Summons issued to defendant no. 1 have been
received back unserved with the report that the defendant left the
premises one year ago and moved to an unknown place. Further,
as per the report, the owner of the property provided the process
server with defendant no. 1’s wife’s number who was called. She
informed that defendant no. 1 has gone to his village for Chhatt
Pooja.
In view of the report, let summons be issued to
defendant no. 1 on filing of PF only through all permissible
electronic modes including whatsapp on mobile number
8744025007 in addition to the contact numbers already available,
returnable for the NDOH.
Further, let summons be issued to the defendant no.
2 on filing of PF / RC / through all prescribed modes including
electronic mode returnable for NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 02.02.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
10.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10 Civ Suit 937/24
Canara Bank Vs. Vishnu Keshan
18.08.2025
Present: Sh. Ankur Singh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through V/C.
Original postal receipts alongwith tracking reports
have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Taken on record.
As per the tracking report, the summons sent on
S-99, 4th Floor Sundar Block, Shakarpur, Delhi-92 were refused.
However, as per the process server’s report, the defendant was
not found to be living at the said address.
In view of the conflicting reports, it is considered fit
to issue fresh summons to the defendant only on the aforesaid
address once again.
Accordingly, let fresh summons be issued to the
defendant only on the aforesaid address through all prescribed
modes including electronic mode on filing of PF / RC returnable
for NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 10.11.2025.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
18.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --