TrustJury record updated 17 Oct 2026
Not available
Date: 23-09-2025 Business: CASE ADJOURNED. Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 06-01-2026 Date: 06-01-2026 Business: CASE ADJOURNED. Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 19-03-2026 Date: 19-03-2026 Business: Mis. Next Purpose: Misc. cases Next Hearing Date: 07-07-2026 Date: 07-07-2026 Business: Misl. arg. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 02-09-2026 Date: 02-09-2026 Business: Misl. arg. Next Purpose: Misc. Arguments Next Hearing Date: 29-10-2026
Filing Number: 1207/2025 Filing Date: 22-09-2025 eFiling Number: ADL20250008771C202500016 eFiling Date: 21-09-2025 First Hearing Date: 23rd September 2025 Court Number And Judge: 66-ACJ/CCJ/ARC
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 17 Civ Suit 742/25 GARIMA SINGH Vs. JITENDER BHATIA 02.09.2026 Present: Sh. Harsh Gupta, Ld counsel for the plaintiff with plaintiff. Sh. Ajay Chawla, Ld counsel for defendant no.1 and 2 (through VC). Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submits that he does not wish to file any reply to the application of defendant no. 1 and 2 for condonation of delay in filing of WS and he is ready to straightway address his…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 5 Civ Suit 742/25 GARIMA SINGH Vs. JITENDER BHATIA 07.07.2026 Present: Sh. Harsh Gupta, Ld counsel for the plaintiff with plaintiff. Sh. Ajay Chawala, Ld counsel for defendant no.1 and 2. In between dates, WS alongwith an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act has been filed on behalf of defendant no.1 and 2. Copy already supplied. Due to Administrative work, matter is adjourned for arguments on the application under Section 5 of Limitation Act on 02.09.2026. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/07.07.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 8 Civ Suit 742/25 GARIMA SINGH Vs. JITENDER BHATIA 19.03.2026 Present: Sh. Harsh Gupta, Ld counsel for the plaintiff (through VC). Sh. Rahul Pal, Ld counsel for defendant no. 1 and 2 (through VC). Defendant no. 2 in person. In between dates, WS alongwith an application for condonation of delay in filing of WS has been filed on behalf of the defendant. Copy already supplied. It is submitted by Ld counsel for the plaintiff that WS has been purportedly filed on behalf of both the defendants but the WS has been signed by defendant no.1 only. On this, Ld counsel for the defendants has submitted that the signature of defendant no.2 could not have been obtained because D2 was hospitalized. Ld counsel for the defendant is hereby directed to file fresh WS in proper form in terms of provisions contained in under Order 8 CPC. Put up for further proceedings on 07.07.2026. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/19.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 Civ Suit 742/25 GARIMA SINGH Vs. JITENDER BHATIA 06.01.2026 Present: Ms. Shisti, Ld proxy counsel for the plaintiff. Summons issued upon defendant no.1 and 2 received back served on 20.12.2025. Let WS be filed by both the defendants within stipulated time with advance copy to the opposite side. Let replication be filed by the plaintiff with advance copy to the opposite side. Put up for completion of pleadings, admission/denial of documents and framing of issues on 19.03.2026. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/06.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 12 Civ Suit 742/25 GARIMA SINGH Vs. JITENDER BHATIA Fresh suit received by way of e-filing. It be checked and registered. 23.09.2025 Present: Ms. Kanupriya, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff with plaintiff. Heard. Record perused. It is submitted by Ld counsel for the plaintiff that the plaintiff want to drop the relief i.e declaration in prayer clause (a) of the plaint. Separate statement of the plaintiff recorded in this regard. In view of the same, the relief i.e declaration in prayer clause (a) is dropped in the present suit. Issue summons of the suit for settlement of issues and notice of the application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC to the defendant(s) through all permissible modes on filing of PF/RC for the next date. Defendant (s) shall file its WS within time stipulated by law. Put up on 06.01.2026. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/23.09.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 17 Civ Suit 742/25 GARIMA SINGH Vs. JITENDER BHATIA 02.09.2026 Present: Sh. Harsh Gupta, Ld counsel for the plaintiff with plaintiff. Sh. Ajay Chawla, Ld counsel for defendant no.1 and 2 (through VC). Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submits that he does not wish to file any reply to the application of defendant no. 1 and 2 for condonation of delay in filing of WS and he is ready to straightway address his…
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 5 Civ Suit 742/25 GARIMA SINGH Vs. JITENDER BHATIA 07.07.2026 Present: Sh. Harsh Gupta, Ld counsel for the plaintiff with plaintiff. Sh. Ajay Chawala, Ld counsel for defendant no.1 and 2. In between dates, WS alongwith an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act has been filed on behalf of defendant no.1 and 2. Copy already supplied. Due to Administrative work, matter is adjourned for arguments on the application under Section 5 of Limitation Act on 02.09.2026. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/07.07.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 8 Civ Suit 742/25 GARIMA SINGH Vs. JITENDER BHATIA 19.03.2026 Present: Sh. Harsh Gupta, Ld counsel for the plaintiff (through VC). Sh. Rahul Pal, Ld counsel for defendant no. 1 and 2 (through VC). Defendant no. 2 in person. In between dates, WS alongwith an application for condonation of delay in filing of WS has been filed on behalf of the defendant. Copy already supplied. It is submitted by Ld counsel for the plaintiff that WS has been purportedly filed on behalf of both the defendants but the WS has been signed by defendant no.1 only. On this, Ld counsel for the defendants has submitted that the signature of defendant no.2 could not have been obtained because D2 was hospitalized. Ld counsel for the defendant is hereby directed to file fresh WS in proper form in terms of provisions contained in under Order 8 CPC. Put up for further proceedings on 07.07.2026. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/19.03.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 9 Civ Suit 742/25 GARIMA SINGH Vs. JITENDER BHATIA 06.01.2026 Present: Ms. Shisti, Ld proxy counsel for the plaintiff. Summons issued upon defendant no.1 and 2 received back served on 20.12.2025. Let WS be filed by both the defendants within stipulated time with advance copy to the opposite side. Let replication be filed by the plaintiff with advance copy to the opposite side. Put up for completion of pleadings, admission/denial of documents and framing of issues on 19.03.2026. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/06.01.2026 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF ORDER Pdf Text: 12 Civ Suit 742/25 GARIMA SINGH Vs. JITENDER BHATIA Fresh suit received by way of e-filing. It be checked and registered. 23.09.2025 Present: Ms. Kanupriya, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff with plaintiff. Heard. Record perused. It is submitted by Ld counsel for the plaintiff that the plaintiff want to drop the relief i.e declaration in prayer clause (a) of the plaint. Separate statement of the plaintiff recorded in this regard. In view of the same, the relief i.e declaration in prayer clause (a) is dropped in the present suit. Issue summons of the suit for settlement of issues and notice of the application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC to the defendant(s) through all permissible modes on filing of PF/RC for the next date. Defendant (s) shall file its WS within time stipulated by law. Put up on 06.01.2026. (VINIK JAIN) ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC (East) KKD Courts, Delhi/23.09.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
