KAILASH SINGH BISHTVsJAI AMBEY APARTMENTS RWA +3 more

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit524/23
KAILASH SINGH BISHT Vs. JAI AMBEY APARTMENTS RWA
27.09.2023
Pr. Ms. Rani Kumari, Proxy counsel for the plaintiff
(through VC).
Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 2.
None for the remaining defendants.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 2 submits that the
application of the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of CPC,
was dismissed vide order dt. 15.07.2023. The elections have ac
cordingly been conducted. He submits that the suit has become
infructuous.
It can be observed that clarifications regarding the
maintainability of the present suit were sought vide previous or
der. Proxy counsel for the plaintiff seeks adjournment submit
ting that the main counsel is suffering from fever and is not
available for arguments.
Considering the submissions made, adjournment is
allowed for today.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the defendant submits
that the copy of plaint and documents has not been supplied to
him till date. Let the same be supplied against receipt.
Now to come up for arguments on the maintainability
of the suit on 17.01.2024.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/ 27.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 5 Civ Suit524/23
KAILASH SINGH BISHT Vs. JAI AMBEY APARTMENTS RWA
File has been taken up today as 17.01.2024 was declared as holiday as per the
list of holidays issued by Hon’ble High Court of Delhi.
18.01.2024
Present: Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff through V.C.
Present suit had been filed on behalf of the plaintiff for permanent
injunction against the defendant.
As per record, vide Order, dated 15.07.2023, the application of the
plaintiff U/o 39 rules 1&2 CPC was dismissed by a detailed Order, passed by
the Ld. Predecessor of the Court and Vide Order, dated 27.09.2023, the matter
was fixed for arguments regarding maintainability of the present suit after
holding of Elections of defendant no.1 Society.
Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff has requested for one opportunity
for appearance of the main Counsel for the plaintiff as well as the plaintiff on
the NDOH and to address arguments on the maintainability of the present suit,
in terms of the previous Orders of the Court. Said request is allowed.
Now, put up for arguments on the maintainability of the present suit
on 30.03.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/ 18.01.2024.
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit524/23
KAILASH SINGH BISHT Vs. JAI AMBEY APARTMENTS RWA
27.09.2023
Pr. Ms. Rani Kumari, Proxy counsel for the plaintiff
(through VC).
Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 2.
None for the remaining defendants.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant no. 2 submits that the
application of the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of CPC,
was dismissed vide order dt. 15.07.2023. The elections have ac
cordingly been conducted. He submits that the suit has become
infructuous.
It can be observed that clarifications regarding the
maintainability of the present suit were sought vide previous or
der. Proxy counsel for the plaintiff seeks adjournment submit
ting that the main counsel is suffering from fever and is not
available for arguments.
Considering the submissions made, adjournment is
allowed for today.
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the defendant submits
that the copy of plaint and documents has not been supplied to
him till date. Let the same be supplied against receipt.
Now to come up for arguments on the maintainability
of the suit on 17.01.2024.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/ 27.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --