MANISH KHULLARVsRAJU

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
18.04.2026
Present: Sh. Abhishek, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Sunil Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
An application under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC has been
filed on behalf of the defendant. Taken on record. Copy supplied.
Also, an application under Order 23 Rule 1 r/w
Section 151 CPC for abandonment of part of claim has been filed
on behalf of the plaintiff. Taken on record. Copy supplied.
The parties are directed to file replies, if any, to the
aforementioned applications with advance copy to the opposing
sides at least a week prior to the NDOH.
Be put up for arguments on the aforementioned
applications on 25.07.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
18.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
06.11.2025
Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
Present: None for the plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
Be put up for further proceedings on 27.01.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
06.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
27.09.2025
Present: Sh. Anshul Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through V/C.
Sh. Sumit Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
alongwith defendant.
The Ahlmad has sought some more time to trace the
application under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC. He is directed to
positively trace the application before the NDOH and tag it
alongwith the file.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he wishes
to file an application under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC for
abandonment of part claim.
In view of the submission, be put up for filing of the
application / further proceedings on 06.11.2025 at 12:00 pm.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
27.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
11.07.2025
Present: Sh. Anshul Sharma, ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Harish Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
The matter is fixed for arguments on application
under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC. However, the application is not on
the file.
The Ahlmad is directed to trace the application and
tag it at the correct position at least a week prior to the NDOH.
Be put up for arguments on the aforesaid application
on 27.09.2025.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
11.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
31.01.2025
Present: Mr. Anshul Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through VC.
Mr. Divyam Garg, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Defendant in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Mr.
Sunil Gupta.
Application under O 12 R 6 CPC filed. Taken on
record. Copy supplied.
Let reply be filed by NDOH with an advance copy
to the opposing side at least a week prior thereto.
It is seen that in the application under O 39 R 1 and
2 CPC, plaintiff has sought restraining the defendant from sub
letting or creating third party interest in the suit property.
Defendant as well as Ld. Counsel state that there is
no intention on part of the defendant to part with the suit
property.
In view of the above, defendant is hereby restrained
from sub letting or creating third party interest in the suit
property during the pendency of the Court proceedings.
Application under O 39 R 1 and 2 CPC stands
allowed in the above-mentioned terms.
Re-list for arguments on 15.04.2025.
(Gaurav Sharma)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
31.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
16.11.2024
Present : Ms. Priyanshi Divedi, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Sunil Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
On perusal of case file, it is observed that matter is at the stage
of filing of replication/ arguments on application under Order 39 Rule 1 and
2 CPC.
Ld. Proxy counsel states that no replication is required to be
filed. Instead, an application under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC shall be filed in
due course. An advance copy of the same be supplied to the Ld. Counsel for
the defendant at least a week prior to NDOH.
It is made clear that if for any reason whatsoever, advance copy
is not supplied as above, appropriate cost shall be imposed upon the plaintiff.
Relist for 23.01.2025.
(Gaurav Sharma)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/16.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
30.09.2024
Present : Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff (through VC).
Sh. Sunil Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
As per record, WS has already been filed on behalf of the
defendant in the present case. Same is taken on record.
Extra copy of the WS also placed on record for the counsel for
the plaintiff. He may collect the same from the reader of this court as and
when, he appears in the court.
Let replication be filed by the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff in the
present case positively by the NDOH with an advance copy of the same to
the counsel for defendant at least one week before the NDOH.
Now put up for filing of replication / arguments on the interim
application / further proceedings on 16.11.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/30.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
14.08.2024
Present: Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Counsel for the plaintiff has submitted that he has supplied
copy of the legible documents to the Counsel for the defendant today itself
in terms of previous orders of the court.
Counsel for the plaintiff is impressed upon to remain careful in
future regarding compliance of the orders of the court on time as directed
by the court, failing which appropriate orders shall be passed accordingly.
Last and final opportunity is given to the Counsel for the defen-
dant to file the WS in the present case within thirty days from today with an
advance copy of the same to the Counsel for the plaintiff at least one week
before the NDOH.
Now, put up for filing of WS/ further proceedings on NDOH i.e.,
30.09.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/14.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
01.07.2024
Present : Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Today fresh vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the defendant.
Same is taken on record.
As per report of summons, summons have been served upon the
defendant on 14.06.2024.
At the request of the counsel for the defendant, counsel for the plaintiff
is directed to supply legible copies/colored copies of the documents from page no.
53 to 60 within three days from today. Thereafter, the defendant is directed to file
written statement in the present matter within next 30 days with an advance copy of
the same to the counsel for the plaintiff at least one week before the next date of
hearing.
Now, put up for filing of WS / further proceedings on 14.08.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/01.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10 Civ Suit453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
16.01.2024
Pr. None for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff against the
defendant for possession and recovery of user charges.
Vide order dt. 20.09.2023 summons for settlement of
issues were directed to be issued, however, PF was filed late by
the plaintiff and for this reason, summons could not be issued
against the defendant.
In view of the same, issue fresh summons upon the
defendant at the given addresses on PF already filed alongwith
copy of plaint and documents within 07 days from today,
returnable for NDOH.
Now put up for report on summons/ further proceedings
on 23.03.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/16.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
20/09/2023
One of the Regular Steno is on leave.
Pr. None for the plaintiff.
There is no report as to whether PF was filed by the
plaintiff or not.
The Ahlmad as well as the Assistant Ahlmad are on leave.
No PF receipt is there on record.
Further, none has appeared for the plaintiff today.
Be that as it may, let fresh summons for settlement of
issues be issued to the defendant in terms of previous order.
Now to come up on 16/01/2024.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/20/09/2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
24.07.2023
One of the regular Stenographers is on leave and no
substitute Steno has been provided.
Pr. None for the plaintiff.
Physical copy of the plaint has not been filed. Plaintiff
was absent even on the LDOH.
Last opportunity is given to pursue the present suit.
Now, to come up on 28.08.2023.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/24.07.2023
At 12.10 PM
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has appeared
and physical file has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff on
record.
Submissions heard. Record perused and considered.
Let fresh summons of the settlement of issues along
with notice of application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC
be issued to the defendant, through all modes, including speed
post/Registered AD, on filing PF within 15 days. Dasti
service is also allowed.
At request, date is changed to 20.09.2023.
Previous date stands cancelled.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/24.07.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 453/2023
Manish Khullar vs. Raju
03.06.2023.
Fresh suit received by way of electronic mode. It be
checked and registered.
Pr. None for the plaintiff.
Physical copy of the plaint has not been filed.
Let the physical copy of plaint be filed by the plaintiff on
or before the NDOH.
Be put up on 24.07.2023.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/ 03.06.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 11 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
CNR No.DLET030008732023
26.09.2026
Present: Sh. Abhishek, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Sunil Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Both parties submit that no written replies are
required to be filed to the applications under Order VII Rule 10
CPC and Order XXIII Rule 1 r/w Section 151 CPC filed by the
respective parties.
Further, Ld. Proxy counsel appearing for the plaintiff
submits that the main counsel has duly authorised him to address
arguments on the aforementioned applications.
Arguments have been heard on the pending
applications under Order VII Rule 10 CPC and Order XXIII Rule
1 r/w Section 151 CPC.
Be put up for orders on 23.10.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
26.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
18.04.2026
Present: Sh. Abhishek, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Sunil Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
An application under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC has been
filed on behalf of the defendant. Taken on record. Copy supplied.
Also, an application under Order 23 Rule 1 r/w
Section 151 CPC for abandonment of part of claim has been filed
on behalf of the plaintiff. Taken on record. Copy supplied.
The parties are directed to file replies, if any, to the
aforementioned applications with advance copy to the opposing
sides at least a week prior to the NDOH.
Be put up for arguments on the aforementioned
applications on 25.07.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
18.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
06.11.2025
Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
Present: None for the plaintiff.
Defendant in person.
Be put up for further proceedings on 27.01.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
06.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
27.09.2025
Present: Sh. Anshul Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through V/C.
Sh. Sumit Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
alongwith defendant.
The Ahlmad has sought some more time to trace the
application under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC. He is directed to
positively trace the application before the NDOH and tag it
alongwith the file.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he wishes
to file an application under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC for
abandonment of part claim.
In view of the submission, be put up for filing of the
application / further proceedings on 06.11.2025 at 12:00 pm.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
27.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
11.07.2025
Present: Sh. Anshul Sharma, ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Harish Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
The matter is fixed for arguments on application
under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC. However, the application is not on
the file.
The Ahlmad is directed to trace the application and
tag it at the correct position at least a week prior to the NDOH.
Be put up for arguments on the aforesaid application
on 27.09.2025.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
11.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
31.01.2025
Present: Mr. Anshul Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through VC.
Mr. Divyam Garg, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff.
Defendant in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Mr.
Sunil Gupta.
Application under O 12 R 6 CPC filed. Taken on
record. Copy supplied.
Let reply be filed by NDOH with an advance copy
to the opposing side at least a week prior thereto.
It is seen that in the application under O 39 R 1 and
2 CPC, plaintiff has sought restraining the defendant from sub
letting or creating third party interest in the suit property.
Defendant as well as Ld. Counsel state that there is
no intention on part of the defendant to part with the suit
property.
In view of the above, defendant is hereby restrained
from sub letting or creating third party interest in the suit
property during the pendency of the Court proceedings.
Application under O 39 R 1 and 2 CPC stands
allowed in the above-mentioned terms.
Re-list for arguments on 15.04.2025.
(Gaurav Sharma)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
31.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
16.11.2024
Present : Ms. Priyanshi Divedi, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Sunil Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
On perusal of case file, it is observed that matter is at the stage
of filing of replication/ arguments on application under Order 39 Rule 1 and
2 CPC.
Ld. Proxy counsel states that no replication is required to be
filed. Instead, an application under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC shall be filed in
due course. An advance copy of the same be supplied to the Ld. Counsel for
the defendant at least a week prior to NDOH.
It is made clear that if for any reason whatsoever, advance copy
is not supplied as above, appropriate cost shall be imposed upon the plaintiff.
Relist for 23.01.2025.
(Gaurav Sharma)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/16.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
30.09.2024
Present : Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff (through VC).
Sh. Sunil Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
As per record, WS has already been filed on behalf of the
defendant in the present case. Same is taken on record.
Extra copy of the WS also placed on record for the counsel for
the plaintiff. He may collect the same from the reader of this court as and
when, he appears in the court.
Let replication be filed by the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff in the
present case positively by the NDOH with an advance copy of the same to
the counsel for defendant at least one week before the NDOH.
Now put up for filing of replication / arguments on the interim
application / further proceedings on 16.11.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/30.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
14.08.2024
Present: Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Counsel for the plaintiff has submitted that he has supplied
copy of the legible documents to the Counsel for the defendant today itself
in terms of previous orders of the court.
Counsel for the plaintiff is impressed upon to remain careful in
future regarding compliance of the orders of the court on time as directed
by the court, failing which appropriate orders shall be passed accordingly.
Last and final opportunity is given to the Counsel for the defen-
dant to file the WS in the present case within thirty days from today with an
advance copy of the same to the Counsel for the plaintiff at least one week
before the NDOH.
Now, put up for filing of WS/ further proceedings on NDOH i.e.,
30.09.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/14.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1 Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
01.07.2024
Present : Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Today fresh vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the defendant.
Same is taken on record.
As per report of summons, summons have been served upon the
defendant on 14.06.2024.
At the request of the counsel for the defendant, counsel for the plaintiff
is directed to supply legible copies/colored copies of the documents from page no.
53 to 60 within three days from today. Thereafter, the defendant is directed to file
written statement in the present matter within next 30 days with an advance copy of
the same to the counsel for the plaintiff at least one week before the next date of
hearing.
Now, put up for filing of WS / further proceedings on 14.08.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/01.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 10 Civ Suit453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
16.01.2024
Pr. None for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff against the
defendant for possession and recovery of user charges.
Vide order dt. 20.09.2023 summons for settlement of
issues were directed to be issued, however, PF was filed late by
the plaintiff and for this reason, summons could not be issued
against the defendant.
In view of the same, issue fresh summons upon the
defendant at the given addresses on PF already filed alongwith
copy of plaint and documents within 07 days from today,
returnable for NDOH.
Now put up for report on summons/ further proceedings
on 23.03.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/16.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
20/09/2023
One of the Regular Steno is on leave.
Pr. None for the plaintiff.
There is no report as to whether PF was filed by the
plaintiff or not.
The Ahlmad as well as the Assistant Ahlmad are on leave.
No PF receipt is there on record.
Further, none has appeared for the plaintiff today.
Be that as it may, let fresh summons for settlement of
issues be issued to the defendant in terms of previous order.
Now to come up on 16/01/2024.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/20/09/2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit453/23
MANISH KHULLAR Vs. RAJU
24.07.2023
One of the regular Stenographers is on leave and no
substitute Steno has been provided.
Pr. None for the plaintiff.
Physical copy of the plaint has not been filed. Plaintiff
was absent even on the LDOH.
Last opportunity is given to pursue the present suit.
Now, to come up on 28.08.2023.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/24.07.2023
At 12.10 PM
At this stage, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has appeared
and physical file has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff on
record.
Submissions heard. Record perused and considered.
Let fresh summons of the settlement of issues along
with notice of application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC
be issued to the defendant, through all modes, including speed
post/Registered AD, on filing PF within 15 days. Dasti
service is also allowed.
At request, date is changed to 20.09.2023.
Previous date stands cancelled.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/24.07.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 453/2023
Manish Khullar vs. Raju
03.06.2023.
Fresh suit received by way of electronic mode. It be
checked and registered.
Pr. None for the plaintiff.
Physical copy of the plaint has not been filed.
Let the physical copy of plaint be filed by the plaintiff on
or before the NDOH.
Be put up on 24.07.2023.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/ 03.06.2023
-- 1 of 1 --