Interim Order 10

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 3 Civ Suit 470/24
Ashok Goyal Vs. Satish Kumar Aggarwal
24.12.2025
Present: Sh. Kamal Kumar Kashyap, Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff no. 2 alongwith plaintiff no. 2.
Sh. Vikas Giri, ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1.
Ms. Meenu Devi, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no.
3/MCD through V/C.
Upon perusal of the last order sheet, it is seen that due to
an inadvertent typographical error, ‘defendant no. 2’ was mentioned
instead of ‘plaintiff no. 2’ and consequently, court notice was issued to
defendant no. 2. Accordingly, whereever appearing, ‘defendant no. 2’
shall be read as ‘plaintiff no. 2’ in the last order.
Further, since plaintiff no. 2 has appeared today, there is
no requirement of issuing a fresh court notice to him.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff no. 2 submits that the
vakalatnama of the main counsel shall be filed during the course of the
day.
Furthermore, upon perusal of the case file, it is seen that
on the LDOH, plaintiff no. 1 gave a statement that he has settled the
dispute with defendant no. 1 and does not wish to pursue the suit
further. Therefore, plaintiff no. 1 stands deleted from the array of
parties.
Amended memo of parties be filed on the NDOH.
An adjournment is sought by the ld. Counsel for plaintiff
no. 2 on the ground that the main counsel is not available today.
Heard. Allowed.
Be put up for arguments on the point of maintainability /
further proceedings on 12.03.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
24.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --