ASHOK GOYAL +1 moreVsSATISH KUMAR AGGARWAL +1 more

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1 Civ Suit 470/24
Ashok Goyal Vs. Satish Kumar Aggarwal
CNR No.DLET030007302024
15.09.2026
Present: Plaintiff in person.
None for defendant no. 1 and 2.
Ms. Meenu Devi, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.
3/MCD through V/C.
Amended memo of parties has been filed on behalf
of the plaintiff. Taken on record.
One more opportunity is sought by the plaintiff to
amend his plaint in compliance with the directions given vide
order dated 05.06.2026.
Heard.
In the interest of justice, one final opportunity is
granted to the plaintiff to make the necessary rectifications.
Be put up for further proceedings on 14.12.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
15.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1 Civ Suit 470/24
Ashok Goyal Vs. Satish Kumar Aggarwal
CNR No.DLET030007302024
15.09.2026
Present: Plaintiff in person.
None for defendant no. 1 and 2.
Ms. Meenu Devi, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.
3/MCD through V/C.
Amended memo of parties has been filed on behalf
of the plaintiff. Taken on record.
One more opportunity is sought by the plaintiff to
amend his plaint in compliance with the directions given vide
order dated 05.06.2026.
Heard.
In the interest of justice, one final opportunity is
granted to the plaintiff to make the necessary rectifications.
Be put up for further proceedings on 14.12.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
15.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 28 Civ Suit 470/24
Ashok Goyal Vs. Satish Kumar Aggarwal
05.06.2026
Present: Plaintiff no. 2 in person.
Sh. Vikas Giri, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1.
Ms. Meenu Devi, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.3/MCD through V/C.
Vide separate order of even date, it has been held
that the dispute between the parties involves serious questions
relating to title, which cannot be adjudicated in a simplicitor suit
for injunction. In such circumstances, the appropriate remedy for
plaintiff no. 2 is to seek a declaration of his rights in respect of
the suit property along with consequential reliefs of possession
and injunction.
Accordingly, plaintiff no. 2 is directed to amend the
plaint before the NDOH. Needless to say in case plaintiff no. 2
fails to do so, the plaint shall be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11
(b) and (c) CPC.
Also, amended memo of parties was not filed on the
LDOH as undertaken by plaintiff no. 2. He is directed to
positively file the same latest by the NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 15.09.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
05.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 28 Civ Suit 470/24
Ashok Goyal Vs. Satish Kumar Aggarwal
05.06.2026
Present: Plaintiff no. 2 in person.
Sh. Vikas Giri, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1.
Ms. Meenu Devi, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no.3/MCD through V/C.
Vide separate order of even date, it has been held
that the dispute between the parties involves serious questions
relating to title, which cannot be adjudicated in a simplicitor suit
for injunction. In such circumstances, the appropriate remedy for
plaintiff no. 2 is to seek a declaration of his rights in respect of
the suit property along with consequential reliefs of possession
and injunction.
Accordingly, plaintiff no. 2 is directed to amend the
plaint before the NDOH. Needless to say in case plaintiff no. 2
fails to do so, the plaint shall be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11
(b) and (c) CPC.
Also, amended memo of parties was not filed on the
LDOH as undertaken by plaintiff no. 2. He is directed to
positively file the same latest by the NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 15.09.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
05.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 18 Civ Suit 470/24
Ashok Goyal Vs. Satish Kumar Aggarwal
23.05.2026
Present: Sh. R.N. Dubey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff no. 2
alongwith plaintiff no. 2 in person.
Sh. Vikas Giri, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1
alongwith defendant no. 1.
Ms. Meenu Devi, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no.
3/MCD through V/C.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff no. 2 submits that he would
file amended memo of parties during the course of the day.
Arguments have been heard on the point of
maintainability.
Be put up for orders on 05.06.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
23.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 18 Civ Suit 470/24
Ashok Goyal Vs. Satish Kumar Aggarwal
23.05.2026
Present: Sh. R.N. Dubey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff no. 2
alongwith plaintiff no. 2 in person.
Sh. Vikas Giri, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1
alongwith defendant no. 1.
Ms. Meenu Devi, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no.
3/MCD through V/C.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff no. 2 submits that he would
file amended memo of parties during the course of the day.
Arguments have been heard on the point of
maintainability.
Be put up for orders on 05.06.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
23.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16 Civ Suit 470/24
Ashok Goyal Vs. Satish Kumar Aggarwal
12.03.2026
Present: Sh. R.N. Dubey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff no. 2.
Sh. S.N. Khan, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1
alongwith defendant no. 1.
Ms. Meenu Devi, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.
3/MCD through V/C.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he would
file amended memo of parties positively on the NDOH.
Part arguments have been heard on the point of
maintainability.
Be put up for further arguments on 23.05.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
12.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16 Civ Suit 470/24
Ashok Goyal Vs. Satish Kumar Aggarwal
12.03.2026
Present: Sh. R.N. Dubey, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff no. 2.
Sh. S.N. Khan, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1
alongwith defendant no. 1.
Ms. Meenu Devi, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.
3/MCD through V/C.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that he would
file amended memo of parties positively on the NDOH.
Part arguments have been heard on the point of
maintainability.
Be put up for further arguments on 23.05.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
12.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 19 Civ Suit 470/24
Ashok Goyal Vs. Satish Kumar Aggarwal
27.11.2025
Present: Mohd. Zaid and Sh. Zulfikar Ali, Ld. Proxy Counsel
for the plaintiffs alongwith plaintiff no. 1.
Sh. Vikas Giri, ld. Counsel for defendant no. 2
alongwith defendant no. 2.
Ms. Meenu Devi, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no.
3/MCD through V/C.
It is submitted by the proxy counsel for the plaintiffs
that the main suit has been settled between plaintiff no. 1 and
defendant no. 1 and therefore, plaintiff no. 1 does not wish to
pursue the suit further.
Separate statement of plaintiff no. 1 has been
recorded to this effect.
He further submits that he is unable to contact
defendant no. 2 and therefore, he has no information if he wishes
to pursue the suit or not.
In such circumstances, issue court notice to
defendant no. 2, returnable for the NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 24.12.2025.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
27.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 19 Civ Suit 470/24
Ashok Goyal Vs. Satish Kumar Aggarwal
27.11.2025
Present: Mohd. Zaid and Sh. Zulfikar Ali, Ld. Proxy Counsel
for the plaintiffs alongwith plaintiff no. 1.
Sh. Vikas Giri, ld. Counsel for defendant no. 2
alongwith defendant no. 2.
Ms. Meenu Devi, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no.
3/MCD through V/C.
It is submitted by the proxy counsel for the plaintiffs
that the main suit has been settled between plaintiff no. 1 and
defendant no. 1 and therefore, plaintiff no. 1 does not wish to
pursue the suit further.
Separate statement of plaintiff no. 1 has been
recorded to this effect.
He further submits that he is unable to contact
defendant no. 2 and therefore, he has no information if he wishes
to pursue the suit or not.
In such circumstances, issue court notice to
defendant no. 2, returnable for the NDOH.
Be put up for further proceedings on 24.12.2025.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
27.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 22 Civ Suit 470/24
Ashok Goyal Vs. Satish Kumar Aggarwal
09.09.2025
Present: Sh. Prashant, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff no. 1.
Sh. Vikas Giri, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1.
Ms. Meenu Devi, ld. Counsel for defendant no. 3
through V/C.
An adjournment is sought on behalf of the plaintiff
on the ground that the main counsel had to go out of station due
to a family emergency.
In view of the submission and in the larger interest
of justice, the matter is adjourned for today. However, it is made
clear that no further opportunity shall be granted to the plaintiff
for addressing arguments on the maintainability of the suit for
any reason whatsoever.
Defendant no. 1 is directed to carry the original
documents pertaining to the property on the NDOH also.
Be put up for arguments on maintainability of the
suit on 27.11.2025.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
09.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 22 Civ Suit 470/24
Ashok Goyal Vs. Satish Kumar Aggarwal
09.09.2025
Present: Sh. Prashant, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff no. 1.
Sh. Vikas Giri, Ld. Counsel for defendant no. 1.
Ms. Meenu Devi, ld. Counsel for defendant no. 3
through V/C.
An adjournment is sought on behalf of the plaintiff
on the ground that the main counsel had to go out of station due
to a family emergency.
In view of the submission and in the larger interest
of justice, the matter is adjourned for today. However, it is made
clear that no further opportunity shall be granted to the plaintiff
for addressing arguments on the maintainability of the suit for
any reason whatsoever.
Defendant no. 1 is directed to carry the original
documents pertaining to the property on the NDOH also.
Be put up for arguments on maintainability of the
suit on 27.11.2025.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
09.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --