MUNISH KHUNGER AND ORS. +6 moreVsRAMESH AGARWAL AND ANR.

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16 Civ Suit 329/25
MUNISH KHUNGER AND ORS. Vs. RAMESH AGARWAL
AND
ANR.
21.02.2026
Present: Sh. Brijesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Jagat, Intern on behalf of defendant no. 1
through V/C.
Sh. Abhishek Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no. 2 through V/C.
Replication has been filed to the WS of defendant
no. 1. Taken on record. Spare copies of the same have been
placed on the court file. The defendants are directed to get them
collected within a week from today.
An adjournment is sought on behalf of defendant no.
1 on the ground that the main counsel is busy in BCD Elections.
Heard. Allowed.
Be put up for arguments on pending applications
under Section 151 CPC and Order 1 Rule 10 CPC on 30.05.2026.
A longer date is given at the convenience of the parties.
Interim order, if any, be continued till the NDOH.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
21.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 329/25
MUNISH KHUNGER AND ORS. Vs. RAMESH AGARWAL
AND ANR.
07.05.2025
At 02:00 P.M.
Present: Sh. Brijesh Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for
plaintiffs in person.
Plaintiffs No.2, 4 , 5 and 7 in person.
An application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC
alongwith amended plaint stand filed today. Taken on record.
Arguments heard.
Suit proceedings are yet to commence and the
amendment sought is seen to be merely formal in nature. As per
report of the Reader of Court, deficient Court fees is also filed.
Accordingly, the amended sought is allowed. Amended plaint
taken on record.
The present suit is one for injunction and as such
therefore, requirement for staturory notice to MCD is not
mandatory. The nature of relief sought is seen to be urgent. As
such therefore, let summons be issued to the defendants on filing
of PF / RC / through all prescribed modes returnable for
11.06.2025. PF be deposited within a week from today.
(Gaurav Sharma)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
07.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 329/25
MUNISH KHUNGER AND ORS.
Vs.
RAMESH AGARWAL AND ANR.
03.05.2025
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered as per rules.
Present: Mr. Brijesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffs.
Prima facie, the valuation put at the reliefs sought
appears to be improper since three reliefs have been sought and
valuation qua two of them have been made. The Reader has also
pointed out that Court fee is also deficient as well. Clarifications
required. Time sought. Heard. Allowed.
Re-list on 07.05.2025 at 02:00 PM.
(Gaurav Sharma)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
03.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16 Civ Suit 329/25
MUNISH KHUNGER AND ORS. Vs. RAMESH AGARWAL
AND
ANR.
30.05.2026
Present: Sh. Brijesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through V/C.
None for defendant no. 1.
Sh. Abhishek Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.
2.
No replies to the pending applications under Section
151 CPC and Order 1 Rule 10 CPC have been filed by defendant
no. 1. Also, none has appeared for the said defendant today
despite repeated calls. Nevertheless, in the interest of justice, one
final opportunity is granted to him for filing replies and for
addressing arguments on the two applications. It is made clear
that in case replies are not filed and arguments are not addressed
even on the NDOH, the right of defendant no. 1 to do so shall be
closed.
Be put up for arguments on all the pending
applications i.e. applications under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC,
Section 151 CPC and under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC on 25.08.2026.
Interim order, if any, be continued till the NDOH.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
30.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16 Civ Suit 329/25
MUNISH KHUNGER AND ORS. Vs. RAMESH AGARWAL
AND
ANR.
21.02.2026
Present: Sh. Brijesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Jagat, Intern on behalf of defendant no. 1
through V/C.
Sh. Abhishek Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant
no. 2 through V/C.
Replication has been filed to the WS of defendant
no. 1. Taken on record. Spare copies of the same have been
placed on the court file. The defendants are directed to get them
collected within a week from today.
An adjournment is sought on behalf of defendant no.
1 on the ground that the main counsel is busy in BCD Elections.
Heard. Allowed.
Be put up for arguments on pending applications
under Section 151 CPC and Order 1 Rule 10 CPC on 30.05.2026.
A longer date is given at the convenience of the parties.
Interim order, if any, be continued till the NDOH.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
21.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 329/25
MUNISH KHUNGER AND ORS. Vs. RAMESH AGARWAL
AND ANR.
07.05.2025
At 02:00 P.M.
Present: Sh. Brijesh Kumar Sharma, Ld. Counsel for
plaintiffs in person.
Plaintiffs No.2, 4 , 5 and 7 in person.
An application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC
alongwith amended plaint stand filed today. Taken on record.
Arguments heard.
Suit proceedings are yet to commence and the
amendment sought is seen to be merely formal in nature. As per
report of the Reader of Court, deficient Court fees is also filed.
Accordingly, the amended sought is allowed. Amended plaint
taken on record.
The present suit is one for injunction and as such
therefore, requirement for staturory notice to MCD is not
mandatory. The nature of relief sought is seen to be urgent. As
such therefore, let summons be issued to the defendants on filing
of PF / RC / through all prescribed modes returnable for
11.06.2025. PF be deposited within a week from today.
(Gaurav Sharma)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
07.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 329/25
MUNISH KHUNGER AND ORS.
Vs.
RAMESH AGARWAL AND ANR.
03.05.2025
Fresh suit received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered as per rules.
Present: Mr. Brijesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiffs.
Prima facie, the valuation put at the reliefs sought
appears to be improper since three reliefs have been sought and
valuation qua two of them have been made. The Reader has also
pointed out that Court fee is also deficient as well. Clarifications
required. Time sought. Heard. Allowed.
Re-list on 07.05.2025 at 02:00 PM.
(Gaurav Sharma)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
03.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --