BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH CHANDRAVsMR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 15 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA Vs.
MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
20.05.2026
Present: Ms. Sudha Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
alongwith AR of the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Evidence by way of affidavit of PW1/ AR of the
plaintiff has been filed. Taken on record. Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff submits that the copy has been supplied to the defendant
through whatsapp on 19.05.2026.
PW1 Ms. Jhunu Sinha Majumdar has been
examined-in-chief, cross-examination is deferred due to the
absence of the ld. Counsel for defendant. It is made clear that in
case the defendant fails to appear even on the NDOH, his right to
cross-examine PW1 shall be closed.
Be put up for cross-examination of PW1 / further
proceedings on 23.07.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
20.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA Vs. MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB
ENTERPRISES
14.03.2026
Present: Ms. Sudha Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
An adjournment is sought on behalf of the plaintiff
on the ground that the AR is not available as he had an official
leave today.
Heard. Allowed.
Be put up for PE on 20.05.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
14.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA Vs. MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB
ENTERPRISES
10.02.2026
Present: Ms. Sudha Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through V/C.
None for the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks one more
opportunity to take steps for leading plaintiff evidence on the
ground that she noted the wrong date.
In the interest of justice, one final opportunity is
granted to the plaintiff for leading PE.
Be put up for PE on 02.03.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
10.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 19 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA Vs. MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB
ENTERPRISES
03.12.2025
Present: Ms. Sudha Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through V/C.
None for defendant.
One more opportunity is sought for taking steps for
leading evidence in terms of the directions given in the last order.
Heard. Allowed.
Be put up for PE on 10.02.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
03.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 15 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA Vs. MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB
ENTERPRISES
23.09.2025
Present: Sh. Amit Panchal, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Proxy counsel for the plaintiff submits that he does
not wish to file any replication.
Accordingly, pleadings are complete.
On the basis of pleadings of the parties, following
issues are framed for adjudication:-
Issue No.1:Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a
decree for a sum of Rs.2,15,742.42/- alongwith
pendentelite and future interest @ 8.90% per annum
with monthly rests from the date of filing of the suit
till its realization? OPP.
Issue No.2:Relief?
No other issue arises or is pressed for.
Both the parties are directed to file their respective
list of witnesses in terms of order XVI rule 1 CPC within 15
days from the date of order. The plaintiff is directed to file
affidavits of all the PWs before the next date of hearing with
advance copy to the defendant(s) at least one week before the
next date of hearing.
List for PE on 03.12.2025.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
23.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA Vs.
MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
16.07.2025
Present: None for the plaintiff.
Sh. Kanhai Lal, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
alongwith defendant.
No one has appeared on behalf of the plaintiff
despite repeated calls. Despite the same, one final opportunity is
being granted to the plaintiff to file replication, if any, before the
NDOH. It is clarified that if the plaintiff fails to appear on the
NDOH also, the suit shall be dismissed for non-appearance.
Be put up for completion of pleadings, framing of
issues on 23.09.2025.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
16.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA
Vs.
MR. SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
24.03.2025
Present: Ms. Sudha Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Mr.
Kanhai Lal.
WS filed. Taken on record. Copy supplied.
Let replication, if any, be filed with an advance copy
to the Ld. Counsel for the defendant at least a week prior to
NDOH.
Put up for completion of pleadings / framing of
issues on 16.07.2025.
(Gaurav Sharma)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
24.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH CHANDRA Vs.
MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
06.11.2024
Present : Sh. Amit Panchal, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
Mr. Shaab, proprietor of the defendant in person.
It is informed by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff that previous cost
of Rs.1000/- has already been deposited. Receipt be filed during the course
of the day.
The defendant states that he may be given some time to engage
a lawyer. In the alternative, he has also been informed his right of availing
legal aid.
Though statutory period time has already been expired for filing
of WS, considering the indigent nature of the defendant and him having
constrain means, he is given one final opportunity to file WS.
Relist for 24.01.2025.
(Gaurav Sharma)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/06.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 6 Civ Suit No. 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH CHANDRA Vs.
MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
24.09.2024
Present : Ms. Vibha Jain, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
As per record, summons have been served upon the defendant at
the second address on 22.08.2024.
Despite this, none has appeared on behalf of defendant in the
present case today nor any WS has been filed to contest the suit of the
plaintiff.
No adverse order is passed against the defendant today.
Be awaited for appearance of defendant / filing of WS on the
NDOH.
Counsel for plaintiff is also directed to deposit the cost of
Rs.1000/- with DLSA East in terms of order dated 06.08.2024 passed by the
court positively by the NDOH.
Now, put up for appearance of defendant / filing of WS on
06.11.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/24.09.2024
At 11.45 AM,
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
At this stage, defendant has appeared before the court and he has been
apprised regarding today’s proceedings and next date of hearing i.e.
06.11.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/24.09.2024
-- 2 of 2 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH CHANDRA Vs.
MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
06.08.2024
Present: Ld. counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
On the last date of hearing, fresh summons were directed to be is-
sued to the defendant at the given addresses on taking steps by the plaintiff.
As per report of the Ahlmad, no steps have been taken on behalf of
the plaintiff despite directions of the court to this effect.
Accordingly, due to non compliance of the directions of the court, a
cost of Rs.1000/- is imposed upon the plaintiff to be deposited with DLSA, East,
by the NDOH.
Let fresh summons be issued to the defendant at the given ad-
dresses on filing of PF/RC/Speed post alongwith copy of plaint and documents
within 7 days from today, returnable for the NDOH.
Now put up for report on summons / further proceedings on
24.09.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/06.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14Civ Suit89/23BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA Vs.MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
16.04.2024
Present : Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Counsel for plaintiff has requested for one more
opportunity to verify/ file fresh address of the defendant if available
by the NDOH or to take appropriate steps for substituted service
upon the defendant on the NDOH.
Said request is allowed. Subject to cost of Rs. 500/- to be
deposited with DLSA East by the NDOH.
Let steps be taken by the counsel for the plaintiff in the
present case as directed by the court, positively by the NDOH i.e.
03.06.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/16.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 6 Civ Suit89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH CHANDRA Vs. MR.SHAAB
PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
19.02.2024
Present: Sh. Amit Panchal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
As per record, present suit has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff
for recovery of Rs.2,15,742.42/ alongwith interest against the defendant.
On the LDOH, fresh address of the defendant was directed to be
filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
Today, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has requested for one more
opportunity to verify/ file fresh address of the defendant, if available, by the
NDOH or in the alternative take appropriate steps for substituted service upon
the defendant on the NDOH.
Said request is allowed.
Let steps be taken in this regard by the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
positively by the NDOH.
Now, put up for clarification/ filing of fresh address of the
defendant on 16.04.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/19.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH CHANDRA
Vs.MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
09.10.2023
Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
One of the Regular Stenographer is on leave today.
Pr. None for the plaintiff.
Steps have not been taken by the plaintiff in terms of
previous order.
As the lawyers are abstaining from work today, no
adverse order is being passed.
Let the fresh address be filed and appropriate steps be
taken in terms of order dt. 05.06.2023.
Now, to come up on 19.02.2024.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/09.10.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH CHANDRA
Vs. MR. SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
05.06.2023
Pr. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Summons issued to the defendant by way of ordinary
mode as well as RC received back unserved with the report of
that the address is incorrect. Fresh address, if any, of the
defendant be also furnished.
On filing of fresh address, fresh summons of the suit be
issued to the defendant, through all modes, including electronic
mode/whatsapp (through Nazarat Branch) and speed
post/Registered AD. Dasti service is also allowed. Let the
report be also annexed with the screen shot of the service
effected through Whatsapp, if any.
Put up on 09.10.2023.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/ 05.06.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1.Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH CHANDRA Vs.
MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
24/02/2023
Pr. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Fresh summons of the suit be issued to the defendant,
through all modes, including speed post/Registered AD. Dasti
service is also allowed.
Put up on 05.06.2023 for further proceedings.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/24/02/2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 89/2023
Bank of Baroda Vs. Mr. Shaab Prop. M/s Shaab Enterprises
02.02.2023.
Fresh suit filed by way of efiling. Same be checked and registered.
Regular stenographer is on leave today.
Present: None.
Plaintiff has not submitted physical file.
In view of the same, plaintiff is directed to file the same before NDOH.
Put up on 24.02.2023 for purpose fixed.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/02/02/2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 8 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA Vs. MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB
ENTERPRISES
CNR No.DLET030002082023
26.09.2026
Present: Ms. Sudha Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
The matter is fixed for cross-examination of PW1.
However, none has appeared for the defendant despite repeated
calls.
Further, upon perusal of the case file, it is seen that
none has been appearing for the defendant since the last several
dates of hearing. In such circumstances, this court does not deem
it fit to afford another opportunity to the defendant to cross-
examine PW1. Accordingly, the right of the defendant to cross-
examine PW1 stands closed.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that no other
plaintiff witness is required to be examined.
Vide separate statement of the Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff, PE stands closed.
Defendant is directed to file the list of witnesses and
the evidence by way of affidavit of the defence witnesses with
advance copy to the plaintiff at least a week prior to the NDOH.
Be put up for DE on 27.10.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
26.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 15 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA Vs.
MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
20.05.2026
Present: Ms. Sudha Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
alongwith AR of the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
Evidence by way of affidavit of PW1/ AR of the
plaintiff has been filed. Taken on record. Ld. Counsel for the
plaintiff submits that the copy has been supplied to the defendant
through whatsapp on 19.05.2026.
PW1 Ms. Jhunu Sinha Majumdar has been
examined-in-chief, cross-examination is deferred due to the
absence of the ld. Counsel for defendant. It is made clear that in
case the defendant fails to appear even on the NDOH, his right to
cross-examine PW1 shall be closed.
Be put up for cross-examination of PW1 / further
proceedings on 23.07.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
20.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 20 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA Vs. MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB
ENTERPRISES
14.03.2026
Present: Ms. Sudha Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
An adjournment is sought on behalf of the plaintiff
on the ground that the AR is not available as he had an official
leave today.
Heard. Allowed.
Be put up for PE on 20.05.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
14.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA Vs. MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB
ENTERPRISES
10.02.2026
Present: Ms. Sudha Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through V/C.
None for the defendant.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks one more
opportunity to take steps for leading plaintiff evidence on the
ground that she noted the wrong date.
In the interest of justice, one final opportunity is
granted to the plaintiff for leading PE.
Be put up for PE on 02.03.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
10.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 19 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA Vs. MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB
ENTERPRISES
03.12.2025
Present: Ms. Sudha Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
through V/C.
None for defendant.
One more opportunity is sought for taking steps for
leading evidence in terms of the directions given in the last order.
Heard. Allowed.
Be put up for PE on 10.02.2026.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
03.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 15 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA Vs. MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB
ENTERPRISES
23.09.2025
Present: Sh. Amit Panchal, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the
plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Proxy counsel for the plaintiff submits that he does
not wish to file any replication.
Accordingly, pleadings are complete.
On the basis of pleadings of the parties, following
issues are framed for adjudication:-
Issue No.1:Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a
decree for a sum of Rs.2,15,742.42/- alongwith
pendentelite and future interest @ 8.90% per annum
with monthly rests from the date of filing of the suit
till its realization? OPP.
Issue No.2:Relief?
No other issue arises or is pressed for.
Both the parties are directed to file their respective
list of witnesses in terms of order XVI rule 1 CPC within 15
days from the date of order. The plaintiff is directed to file
affidavits of all the PWs before the next date of hearing with
advance copy to the defendant(s) at least one week before the
next date of hearing.
List for PE on 03.12.2025.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
23.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA Vs.
MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
16.07.2025
Present: None for the plaintiff.
Sh. Kanhai Lal, Ld. Counsel for the defendant
alongwith defendant.
No one has appeared on behalf of the plaintiff
despite repeated calls. Despite the same, one final opportunity is
being granted to the plaintiff to file replication, if any, before the
NDOH. It is clarified that if the plaintiff fails to appear on the
NDOH also, the suit shall be dismissed for non-appearance.
Be put up for completion of pleadings, framing of
issues on 23.09.2025.
(Dr. Saema Jain)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
16.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA
Vs.
MR. SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
24.03.2025
Present: Ms. Sudha Shukla, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Defendant in person alongwith Ld. Counsel Mr.
Kanhai Lal.
WS filed. Taken on record. Copy supplied.
Let replication, if any, be filed with an advance copy
to the Ld. Counsel for the defendant at least a week prior to
NDOH.
Put up for completion of pleadings / framing of
issues on 16.07.2025.
(Gaurav Sharma)
JSCC-cum-ASCJ-cum-Guardian Judge
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
24.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 4 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH CHANDRA Vs.
MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
06.11.2024
Present : Sh. Amit Panchal, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff.
Mr. Shaab, proprietor of the defendant in person.
It is informed by Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff that previous cost
of Rs.1000/- has already been deposited. Receipt be filed during the course
of the day.
The defendant states that he may be given some time to engage
a lawyer. In the alternative, he has also been informed his right of availing
legal aid.
Though statutory period time has already been expired for filing
of WS, considering the indigent nature of the defendant and him having
constrain means, he is given one final opportunity to file WS.
Relist for 24.01.2025.
(Gaurav Sharma)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/06.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 6 Civ Suit No. 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH CHANDRA Vs.
MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
24.09.2024
Present : Ms. Vibha Jain, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
As per record, summons have been served upon the defendant at
the second address on 22.08.2024.
Despite this, none has appeared on behalf of defendant in the
present case today nor any WS has been filed to contest the suit of the
plaintiff.
No adverse order is passed against the defendant today.
Be awaited for appearance of defendant / filing of WS on the
NDOH.
Counsel for plaintiff is also directed to deposit the cost of
Rs.1000/- with DLSA East in terms of order dated 06.08.2024 passed by the
court positively by the NDOH.
Now, put up for appearance of defendant / filing of WS on
06.11.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/24.09.2024
At 11.45 AM,
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
At this stage, defendant has appeared before the court and he has been
apprised regarding today’s proceedings and next date of hearing i.e.
06.11.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/24.09.2024
-- 2 of 2 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7 Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH CHANDRA Vs.
MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
06.08.2024
Present: Ld. counsel for the plaintiff.
None for the defendant.
On the last date of hearing, fresh summons were directed to be is-
sued to the defendant at the given addresses on taking steps by the plaintiff.
As per report of the Ahlmad, no steps have been taken on behalf of
the plaintiff despite directions of the court to this effect.
Accordingly, due to non compliance of the directions of the court, a
cost of Rs.1000/- is imposed upon the plaintiff to be deposited with DLSA, East,
by the NDOH.
Let fresh summons be issued to the defendant at the given ad-
dresses on filing of PF/RC/Speed post alongwith copy of plaint and documents
within 7 days from today, returnable for the NDOH.
Now put up for report on summons / further proceedings on
24.09.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/06.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14Civ Suit89/23BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH
CHANDRA Vs.MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
16.04.2024
Present : Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Counsel for plaintiff has requested for one more
opportunity to verify/ file fresh address of the defendant if available
by the NDOH or to take appropriate steps for substituted service
upon the defendant on the NDOH.
Said request is allowed. Subject to cost of Rs. 500/- to be
deposited with DLSA East by the NDOH.
Let steps be taken by the counsel for the plaintiff in the
present case as directed by the court, positively by the NDOH i.e.
03.06.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJ-cum-JSCC-cum-Guardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/16.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 6 Civ Suit89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH CHANDRA Vs. MR.SHAAB
PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
19.02.2024
Present: Sh. Amit Panchal, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
As per record, present suit has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff
for recovery of Rs.2,15,742.42/ alongwith interest against the defendant.
On the LDOH, fresh address of the defendant was directed to be
filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
Today, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff has requested for one more
opportunity to verify/ file fresh address of the defendant, if available, by the
NDOH or in the alternative take appropriate steps for substituted service upon
the defendant on the NDOH.
Said request is allowed.
Let steps be taken in this regard by the Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
positively by the NDOH.
Now, put up for clarification/ filing of fresh address of the
defendant on 16.04.2024.
(Fahad Uddin)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/19.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH CHANDRA
Vs.MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
09.10.2023
Lawyers are abstaining from work today.
One of the Regular Stenographer is on leave today.
Pr. None for the plaintiff.
Steps have not been taken by the plaintiff in terms of
previous order.
As the lawyers are abstaining from work today, no
adverse order is being passed.
Let the fresh address be filed and appropriate steps be
taken in terms of order dt. 05.06.2023.
Now, to come up on 19.02.2024.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/09.10.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH CHANDRA
Vs. MR. SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
05.06.2023
Pr. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Summons issued to the defendant by way of ordinary
mode as well as RC received back unserved with the report of
that the address is incorrect. Fresh address, if any, of the
defendant be also furnished.
On filing of fresh address, fresh summons of the suit be
issued to the defendant, through all modes, including electronic
mode/whatsapp (through Nazarat Branch) and speed
post/Registered AD. Dasti service is also allowed. Let the
report be also annexed with the screen shot of the service
effected through Whatsapp, if any.
Put up on 09.10.2023.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/ 05.06.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 1.Civ Suit 89/23
BANK OF BARODA THROUGH SH DEENANATH CHANDRA Vs.
MR.SHAAB PROP. M/S SHAAB ENTERPRISES
24/02/2023
Pr. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Fresh summons of the suit be issued to the defendant,
through all modes, including speed post/Registered AD. Dasti
service is also allowed.
Put up on 05.06.2023 for further proceedings.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/24/02/2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: Civ Suit 89/2023
Bank of Baroda Vs. Mr. Shaab Prop. M/s Shaab Enterprises
02.02.2023.
Fresh suit filed by way of efiling. Same be checked and registered.
Regular stenographer is on leave today.
Present: None.
Plaintiff has not submitted physical file.
In view of the same, plaintiff is directed to file the same before NDOH.
Put up on 24.02.2023 for purpose fixed.
(Prigya Gupta)
ASCJcumJSCCcumGuardian Judge,
East, KKD Courts, Delhi/02/02/2023
-- 1 of 1 --