JAI KISHANVsJASMEET KAUR SETHI

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 18 CS 68/24
CNR No. DLET01-000819-2024
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
21.08.2026
Present: Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
(through VC)
Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Anshvendra Singh, Ld. Proxy counsel for Sh. S.
S. Sobti, Advocate for all the defendants.
Matter was fixed for cross-examination of PW-1 and
sufficient opportunities have already been granted to the
defendants to cross-examine PW-1.
Despite that, today also, adjournment is being sought
by the learned proxy counsel on the ground that main counsel is
not available today.
Last opportunity is granted to all the defendants
to cross-examine PW-1, subject to the cost of Rs. 2,000/- to be
deposited in DLSA, KKD East, Delhi.
Put up for cross-examination of PW-1/remaining
PE on 16.10.2026. Till then, the interim restraining order shall
remain in force.
(Honey)
District Judge-05(East)
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi-21.08.2026ar
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13 CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
02.06.2026
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Plaintiff / PW-1 Sh. Jai Kishan.
Sh. S. S. Sobti along with Sh. Anshvendra Singh, Ld. Counsel for
all defendants.
PW-1 Sh. Jai Kishan has been further partly cross-examined and
his remaining cross-examination is deferred as it is lunch time and after lunch
Ld. Counel for the defenants is not available.
Put up for further cross-examination of PW-1/ remaining PE on
21.08.2026.
The interim restraining order shall remain in force till the next date
of hearing.
(VIKAS GARG)
District Judge-05(East)
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi-02.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 25 CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
08.05.2026
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Plaintiff / PW-1 Sh. Jai Kishan in person.
Sh. S. S. Sobti, Ld. Counsel for all defendants.
PW-1 Sh. Jai Kishan has been partly cross-examined and his
further cross-examination is deferred at the request of Ld. Counsel for the
defendants.
Put up for further cross-examination of PW-1/remaining PE on
02.06.2026.
The interim restraining order shall remain in force till the next date
of hearing.
(VIKAS GARG)
District Judge-05(East)
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi-08.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
17.04.2026
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Ragani Juneja, Ld. proxy Counsel for the defendant.
An application seeking adjournment has been filed on behalf of the
defendant.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff has no objection to the same.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is
allowed and the matter stands adjourned.
The application stands disposed off.
Put up on 08.05.2026.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/17.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
20.02.2026
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff.
Sh. S. S. Sobti, Ld. Counsel for all defendants.
PW-2 Sh. Jasbir Singh has been further cross-examined and
discharged.
At the joint request of both parties, the matter is listed for cross-
examination of PW-1, Jai Kishan, on 17.04.2026.
The interim restraining order shall remain in force till the next
date of hearing.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/20.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 8 CS 68/24
JAI KISHAN Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
15.11.2025
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff.
Sh. S. S. Sobti, Ld. Counsel for all defendants.
PW-2 Sh. Jasbir Singh in person.
PW-2, Sh. Jasbir Singh, has been partly cross-examined. His
further cross-examination is deferred as the matter reached lunch recess and,
thereafter, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff was not available and requested an
adjournment.
Put up for further cross-examination of PW-2/remaining PE on
20.02.2026.
(VIKAS GARG)
District Judge-05(East)
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi-15.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
11.09.2025
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Ragani Juneja, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Learned counsel for the defendant seeks an adjournment to cross-
examine the witness, submitting that the main counsel is unable to appear today
due to illness.
In the interest of justice, a last opportunity is granted to the
defendant to cross-examine the witness, subject to payment of costs of Rs.
2,000/- to the plaintiff.
Put up for cross-examination of the witness and consideration on
application u/o 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC on 15.11.2025.
The interim restraining order shall remain in force till the next
date of hearing.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/11.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
14.07.2025
Present : Ms. Pallavi Dubey, Ld. Proxy counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Plaintiff in person.
Ms. Sakshi Bhalla, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendants through
VC.
Defendant in person.
Learned counsel for the defendants submits that a transfer petition
is pending before the Principal District & Sessions Judge, East, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi. He seeks an adjournment.
The request is not opposed.
Put up on 11.09.2025 for further proceedings.
The interim restraining order shall remain in force till NDOH.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/14.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
29.05.2025
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff.
Sh. S.S. Sobti, Ld. Counsel for all the defendants.
PW-1 Sh. Jai Kishan and PW-2 Sh. Jasbir Singh appeared and have
been examined-in-chief.
Their cross-examinations are deferred at the request of learned
counsel for the defendants, who submits that a connected matter is pending
before another court, and that all the matters ought to be tried together by one
court. He seeks time to file an appropriate application in this regard.
Put up for cross-examination of PW-1 and PW-2/further
proceedings on 14.07.2025.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/29.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
28.04.2025
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Plaintiff in person.
Ms. Ragni Juneja, Ld. counsel for the defendant through VC.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has already
supplied copies of the evidentiary affidavits of all witnesses to the counsel for
the defendants via email. In support of this, he has also filed a printout
evidencing the sending of the email.
The plaintiff has filed the evidentiary affidavits of four witnesses.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that he is ready to conduct
the examination-in-chief of the witnesses.
Learned counsel for the defendants seeks an adjournment to verify
whether the email was received and also submits that counsel Sh. Shobti is not
available today for this case.
Accordingly, a last opportunity is granted to the defendants to
cross-examine the plaintiff’s witnesses, subject to costs of Rs. 2,000/-, to be
deposited with the DLSA, East, KKD, Delhi.
Put up for Plaintiff’s Evidence on 29.05.2025.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/28.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
06.03.2025
Present : Sh. Raghav Naryan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Ms. Ragni Juneja, Ld. counsel for the defendant through VC.
Admissions and denials are not pressed.
Parties show no interest for referring to dispute for mediation etc.
Pleadings are complete. From the pleadings of the parties,
following issues are framed:
1. Whether plaintiff is entitled for decree of Rs. 50,00,000/-
(Fifty lakhs only), as prayed for? OPP
2. Whether plaintiff is entitled for interest, if so, at what rate
and for what period? OPP
3. Whether the suit is barred by limitation? OPP
4. Relief.
No other issue has been raised, pressed, or disputed regarding the
burden of proof.
Put up for PE on 28.04.2025.
The parties are directed to file their respective lists of witnesses
and provide an advance copy to the opposing party within 15 days from today.
They are also instructed to submit their evidential affidavits, with an advance
copy to the opposing party, at least 15 days before NDOH.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/06.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
01.02.2025
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff.
Ms. Rajni Juneja, Ld. counsel for all the defendants through VC.
An application u/o 7 Rule 14 R/w section 151 of CPC has been
filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Copy of the same has been supplied.
Ld. counsel for the defendants requests for adjournment to file the
reply of the same.
Last opportunity is given to the defendants to file the reply and
argue on the same.
Put up for the reply and arguments on the said application and
admissions and denials and for framing of issues on 17.02.2025.
Interim restraining order shall be continued till NDOH.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/01.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13
CS 68/24
JAI KISHAN VS. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
04.01.2025
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Plaintiff in person.
Ms. Sakshi Bhalla, Ld. counsel for all the defendants through VC.
Fresh vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the defendant no. 3.
The learned counsel for the defendant submitted that the copy of
the replication has not been supplied. She further submitted that a document
was filed with the replication, and she is unaware whether the document is
already part of the record.
In response, the counsel for the plaintiff has sent a copy of the
replication via email to the learned counsel for the defendant, who has
acknowledged receipt of the same.
If the aforementioned document was not filed at the time of
presenting the plaint, it cannot be taken on record. However, the plaintiff is at
liberty to file an appropriate application in this regard.
The learned counsel for the defendant has requested an
adjournment for the purposes of admissions and denials.
Put up for completion of pleadings and admissions and denials and
for framing of issues on 01.02.2025.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/04.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
30.11.2024.
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Plaintiff in person.
Ms. Sakshi Bhalla, Ld. counsel for the defendants through VC.
Replication has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submits that he would supply the copy
of the same to the counsel for the defendants during the course of day.
Ld. counsel for the defendants submits that defendant no. 3 would
be in India in the month of December and then she would be able to file the
vakalatnama on her behalf.
Stay is continued till NDOH.
Put up for completion of pleadings/admissions and denials and for
framing of issues on 04.01.2025.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/30.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
05.09.2024.
Present : Sh. Raghav Naryan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Plaintiff in person.
Ms. Sakshi Bhalla, Ld. Counsel for the defendants through VC.
As per report of Ahlmad, WS and application for seeking
condonation of delay in filing of WS on behalf of all the defendants has been
filed.
Ld. Counsel for the defendants submits that she would file
vakalatnama on behalf of the defendant no. 3 on or before NDOH.
Ld. Counsel for the defendants submits that she would supply the
copy of WS and the said application to the counsel for the plaintiff during the
course of the day.
Put up for reply and arguments on all the pending applications on
30.11.2024.
Stay is continued till NDOH.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/05.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
29.05.2024.
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. S.S. Sopti, Ld. Counsel for the defendants through VC.
Ld. Counsel for the defendants submits that his mother expired and
he requested for adjournment.
Stay would be continued till NDOH.
Put up for further proceedings on 05.09.2024.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/29.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
21.03.2024.
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff in person.
Amended plaint has been received through filing counter.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submits that yesterday, one plaint with
affidavit and list of documents have been filed due to mistake and he withdraws
it. His statement has been recorded separately in this regard.
Let fresh summons for ordinary suit (amended plaint) and
application u/o 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC be issued to all the defendants through all
permissible modes on filing of PF/RC/Speed Post.
Summons be also given in Dasti.
Put up on 16.04.2024.
(Vikas Garg)
ADJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/21.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
20.03.2024.
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that under the instruction of the
plaintiff, he states that the present suit may be treated as ordinary recovery suit.
His statement has been recorded separately in this regard.
In view of the submissions, the present suit is hereby treated as
ordinary suit.
Let amended plaint be filed.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff requested to adjourn the proceedings
till lunch time as he would file the amended plaint today only.
Put up at 2:00 PM.
(Vikas Garg)
ADJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/20.03.2024
At 2:00 PM
Present: Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff (through VC).
Plaintiff in person.
One plaint with affidavits and list of documents have been received
through filing counter but there is no amended plaint in it.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff requested for short adjournment to
clarify the position.
Put up on 21.03.2024.
(Vikas Garg)
ADJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/20.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
06.03.2024.
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff.
Put up for consideration on 20.03.2024.
(Vikas Garg)
ADJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/06.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
02.03.2024
Present : Sh.Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith plaintiff in
person.
None for defendant.
Put up for maintainability of the present suit / further proceedings
on 06.03.2024.
(VIKAS GARG)
Addl. District Judge-05(East)
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi-02.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
14.02.2024.
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff.
Let summons to the suit u/o 37 and as well as application u/o 39
Rule 1 and 2 CPC be issued to the defendants through all permissible modes on
filing of PF.
Summons be also given in Dasti.
Put up on 02.03.2024.
(Vikas Garg)
ADJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/14.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 18 CS 68/24
CNR No. DLET01-000819-2024
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
21.08.2026
Present: Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
(through VC)
Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Anshvendra Singh, Ld. Proxy counsel for Sh. S.
S. Sobti, Advocate for all the defendants.
Matter was fixed for cross-examination of PW-1 and
sufficient opportunities have already been granted to the
defendants to cross-examine PW-1.
Despite that, today also, adjournment is being sought
by the learned proxy counsel on the ground that main counsel is
not available today.
Last opportunity is granted to all the defendants
to cross-examine PW-1, subject to the cost of Rs. 2,000/- to be
deposited in DLSA, KKD East, Delhi.
Put up for cross-examination of PW-1/remaining
PE on 16.10.2026. Till then, the interim restraining order shall
remain in force.
(Honey)
District Judge-05(East)
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi-21.08.2026ar
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 18 CS 68/24
CNR No. DLET01-000819-2024
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
21.08.2026
Present: Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
(through VC)
Plaintiff in person.
Sh. Anshvendra Singh, Ld. Proxy counsel for Sh. S.
S. Sobti, Advocate for all the defendants.
Matter was fixed for cross-examination of PW-1 and
sufficient opportunities have already been granted to the
defendants to cross-examine PW-1.
Despite that, today also, adjournment is being sought
by the learned proxy counsel on the ground that main counsel is
not available today.
Last opportunity is granted to all the defendants
to cross-examine PW-1, subject to the cost of Rs. 2,000/- to be
deposited in DLSA, KKD East, Delhi.
Put up for cross-examination of PW-1/remaining
PE on 16.10.2026. Till then, the interim restraining order shall
remain in force.
(Honey)
District Judge-05(East)
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi-21.08.2026ar
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13 CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
02.06.2026
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Plaintiff / PW-1 Sh. Jai Kishan.
Sh. S. S. Sobti along with Sh. Anshvendra Singh, Ld. Counsel for
all defendants.
PW-1 Sh. Jai Kishan has been further partly cross-examined and
his remaining cross-examination is deferred as it is lunch time and after lunch
Ld. Counel for the defenants is not available.
Put up for further cross-examination of PW-1/ remaining PE on
21.08.2026.
The interim restraining order shall remain in force till the next date
of hearing.
(VIKAS GARG)
District Judge-05(East)
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi-02.06.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 25 CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
08.05.2026
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Plaintiff / PW-1 Sh. Jai Kishan in person.
Sh. S. S. Sobti, Ld. Counsel for all defendants.
PW-1 Sh. Jai Kishan has been partly cross-examined and his
further cross-examination is deferred at the request of Ld. Counsel for the
defendants.
Put up for further cross-examination of PW-1/remaining PE on
02.06.2026.
The interim restraining order shall remain in force till the next date
of hearing.
(VIKAS GARG)
District Judge-05(East)
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi-08.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
17.04.2026
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Ragani Juneja, Ld. proxy Counsel for the defendant.
An application seeking adjournment has been filed on behalf of the
defendant.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff has no objection to the same.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is
allowed and the matter stands adjourned.
The application stands disposed off.
Put up on 08.05.2026.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/17.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
20.02.2026
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff.
Sh. S. S. Sobti, Ld. Counsel for all defendants.
PW-2 Sh. Jasbir Singh has been further cross-examined and
discharged.
At the joint request of both parties, the matter is listed for cross-
examination of PW-1, Jai Kishan, on 17.04.2026.
The interim restraining order shall remain in force till the next
date of hearing.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/20.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 8 CS 68/24
JAI KISHAN Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
15.11.2025
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff along with plaintiff.
Sh. S. S. Sobti, Ld. Counsel for all defendants.
PW-2 Sh. Jasbir Singh in person.
PW-2, Sh. Jasbir Singh, has been partly cross-examined. His
further cross-examination is deferred as the matter reached lunch recess and,
thereafter, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff was not available and requested an
adjournment.
Put up for further cross-examination of PW-2/remaining PE on
20.02.2026.
(VIKAS GARG)
District Judge-05(East)
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi-15.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
11.09.2025
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ms. Ragani Juneja, Ld. Counsel for the defendant.
Learned counsel for the defendant seeks an adjournment to cross-
examine the witness, submitting that the main counsel is unable to appear today
due to illness.
In the interest of justice, a last opportunity is granted to the
defendant to cross-examine the witness, subject to payment of costs of Rs.
2,000/- to the plaintiff.
Put up for cross-examination of the witness and consideration on
application u/o 39 Rule 1 and 2 of CPC on 15.11.2025.
The interim restraining order shall remain in force till the next
date of hearing.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/11.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 14
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
14.07.2025
Present : Ms. Pallavi Dubey, Ld. Proxy counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Plaintiff in person.
Ms. Sakshi Bhalla, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the defendants through
VC.
Defendant in person.
Learned counsel for the defendants submits that a transfer petition
is pending before the Principal District & Sessions Judge, East, Karkardooma
Courts, Delhi. He seeks an adjournment.
The request is not opposed.
Put up on 11.09.2025 for further proceedings.
The interim restraining order shall remain in force till NDOH.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/14.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
29.05.2025
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff.
Sh. S.S. Sobti, Ld. Counsel for all the defendants.
PW-1 Sh. Jai Kishan and PW-2 Sh. Jasbir Singh appeared and have
been examined-in-chief.
Their cross-examinations are deferred at the request of learned
counsel for the defendants, who submits that a connected matter is pending
before another court, and that all the matters ought to be tried together by one
court. He seeks time to file an appropriate application in this regard.
Put up for cross-examination of PW-1 and PW-2/further
proceedings on 14.07.2025.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/29.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
28.04.2025
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Plaintiff in person.
Ms. Ragni Juneja, Ld. counsel for the defendant through VC.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that he has already
supplied copies of the evidentiary affidavits of all witnesses to the counsel for
the defendants via email. In support of this, he has also filed a printout
evidencing the sending of the email.
The plaintiff has filed the evidentiary affidavits of four witnesses.
Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that he is ready to conduct
the examination-in-chief of the witnesses.
Learned counsel for the defendants seeks an adjournment to verify
whether the email was received and also submits that counsel Sh. Shobti is not
available today for this case.
Accordingly, a last opportunity is granted to the defendants to
cross-examine the plaintiff’s witnesses, subject to costs of Rs. 2,000/-, to be
deposited with the DLSA, East, KKD, Delhi.
Put up for Plaintiff’s Evidence on 29.05.2025.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/28.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 13
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
06.03.2025
Present : Sh. Raghav Naryan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Ms. Ragni Juneja, Ld. counsel for the defendant through VC.
Admissions and denials are not pressed.
Parties show no interest for referring to dispute for mediation etc.
Pleadings are complete. From the pleadings of the parties,
following issues are framed:
1. Whether plaintiff is entitled for decree of Rs. 50,00,000/-
(Fifty lakhs only), as prayed for? OPP
2. Whether plaintiff is entitled for interest, if so, at what rate
and for what period? OPP
3. Whether the suit is barred by limitation? OPP
4. Relief.
No other issue has been raised, pressed, or disputed regarding the
burden of proof.
Put up for PE on 28.04.2025.
The parties are directed to file their respective lists of witnesses
and provide an advance copy to the opposing party within 15 days from today.
They are also instructed to submit their evidential affidavits, with an advance
copy to the opposing party, at least 15 days before NDOH.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/06.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
01.02.2025
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff.
Ms. Rajni Juneja, Ld. counsel for all the defendants through VC.
An application u/o 7 Rule 14 R/w section 151 of CPC has been
filed on behalf of the plaintiff. Copy of the same has been supplied.
Ld. counsel for the defendants requests for adjournment to file the
reply of the same.
Last opportunity is given to the defendants to file the reply and
argue on the same.
Put up for the reply and arguments on the said application and
admissions and denials and for framing of issues on 17.02.2025.
Interim restraining order shall be continued till NDOH.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/01.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13
CS 68/24
JAI KISHAN VS. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
04.01.2025
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Plaintiff in person.
Ms. Sakshi Bhalla, Ld. counsel for all the defendants through VC.
Fresh vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the defendant no. 3.
The learned counsel for the defendant submitted that the copy of
the replication has not been supplied. She further submitted that a document
was filed with the replication, and she is unaware whether the document is
already part of the record.
In response, the counsel for the plaintiff has sent a copy of the
replication via email to the learned counsel for the defendant, who has
acknowledged receipt of the same.
If the aforementioned document was not filed at the time of
presenting the plaint, it cannot be taken on record. However, the plaintiff is at
liberty to file an appropriate application in this regard.
The learned counsel for the defendant has requested an
adjournment for the purposes of admissions and denials.
Put up for completion of pleadings and admissions and denials and
for framing of issues on 01.02.2025.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/04.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
30.11.2024.
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Plaintiff in person.
Ms. Sakshi Bhalla, Ld. counsel for the defendants through VC.
Replication has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submits that he would supply the copy
of the same to the counsel for the defendants during the course of day.
Ld. counsel for the defendants submits that defendant no. 3 would
be in India in the month of December and then she would be able to file the
vakalatnama on her behalf.
Stay is continued till NDOH.
Put up for completion of pleadings/admissions and denials and for
framing of issues on 04.01.2025.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/30.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
05.09.2024.
Present : Sh. Raghav Naryan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through VC.
Plaintiff in person.
Ms. Sakshi Bhalla, Ld. Counsel for the defendants through VC.
As per report of Ahlmad, WS and application for seeking
condonation of delay in filing of WS on behalf of all the defendants has been
filed.
Ld. Counsel for the defendants submits that she would file
vakalatnama on behalf of the defendant no. 3 on or before NDOH.
Ld. Counsel for the defendants submits that she would supply the
copy of WS and the said application to the counsel for the plaintiff during the
course of the day.
Put up for reply and arguments on all the pending applications on
30.11.2024.
Stay is continued till NDOH.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/05.09.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
29.05.2024.
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. S.S. Sopti, Ld. Counsel for the defendants through VC.
Ld. Counsel for the defendants submits that his mother expired and
he requested for adjournment.
Stay would be continued till NDOH.
Put up for further proceedings on 05.09.2024.
(Vikas Garg)
DJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/29.05.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
21.03.2024.
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff in person.
Amended plaint has been received through filing counter.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submits that yesterday, one plaint with
affidavit and list of documents have been filed due to mistake and he withdraws
it. His statement has been recorded separately in this regard.
Let fresh summons for ordinary suit (amended plaint) and
application u/o 39 Rule 1 & 2 of CPC be issued to all the defendants through all
permissible modes on filing of PF/RC/Speed Post.
Summons be also given in Dasti.
Put up on 16.04.2024.
(Vikas Garg)
ADJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/21.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
20.03.2024.
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submits that under the instruction of the
plaintiff, he states that the present suit may be treated as ordinary recovery suit.
His statement has been recorded separately in this regard.
In view of the submissions, the present suit is hereby treated as
ordinary suit.
Let amended plaint be filed.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff requested to adjourn the proceedings
till lunch time as he would file the amended plaint today only.
Put up at 2:00 PM.
(Vikas Garg)
ADJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/20.03.2024
At 2:00 PM
Present: Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff (through VC).
Plaintiff in person.
One plaint with affidavits and list of documents have been received
through filing counter but there is no amended plaint in it.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff requested for short adjournment to
clarify the position.
Put up on 21.03.2024.
(Vikas Garg)
ADJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/20.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
06.03.2024.
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff.
Put up for consideration on 20.03.2024.
(Vikas Garg)
ADJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/06.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
02.03.2024
Present : Sh.Raghav Narayan, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff alongwith plaintiff in
person.
None for defendant.
Put up for maintainability of the present suit / further proceedings
on 06.03.2024.
(VIKAS GARG)
Addl. District Judge-05(East)
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi-02.03.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6
CS 68/24
Jai Kishan Vs. JASMEET KAUR SETHI
14.02.2024.
Present : Sh. Raghav Narayan, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff along with
plaintiff.
Let summons to the suit u/o 37 and as well as application u/o 39
Rule 1 and 2 CPC be issued to the defendants through all permissible modes on
filing of PF.
Summons be also given in Dasti.
Put up on 02.03.2024.
(Vikas Garg)
ADJ-05/East/KKD
Delhi/14.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --