Order 7

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
14.01.2026
Present: Ms. Kulwant Kaur, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Rakesh Kumar, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 & 3
through VC.
None for defendant no.2.
Perusal of the record reveals that none has been appearing
for defendant no.2 inspite of service of summons for his appearance for
31.05.2025 and therefore, he is hereby proceeded exparte.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that plaintiff does not wish
to file reply to the application of the defendant no.1 & 3 under Order
VIII Rule 1 (3) CPC to bring some documents on record and further he
has no objection if the application of the defendant no.1 & 3 is allowed
subject to heavy cost.
Heard. Case file perused.
Defendant no.1 & 3 filed the aforesaid application to bring
on record the document i.e. POA, Will, GPA, Agreement Deed, Affidavit
and Receipt, all dated 11.03.2004. The defendant no.1 & 3 in their
written statement disclosed about all those documents in their written
statement and plaintiff in replication claimed that these documents are
forged documents.
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and
the fact that issues have yet to be framed, application of the defendant
-- 1 of 2 --
stands allowed subject to the cost of Rs.1,500/- to be paid to the plaintiff.
Application is disposed off accordingly.
Put up for filing affidavits for admission and denial of
documents, arguments on the application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 &
2 CPC and framing of issues on 18.02.2026.
(Ravinder Singh-I)
District Judge-03
East District, KKD Courts,
Delhi, 14.01.2026
-- 2 of 2 --