Ritu ParmarVsMs Paramjeet Kaur +2 more

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16, CS 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
11.05.2026
Present: Ms. Kulwant Kaur, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff
through VC.
Sh. Manish Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no.1 & 3
through VC.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff requests for an adjournment
stating that main counsel is not available as suffering from chicken pox.
Request is not opposed.
Matter is adjourned for arguments on 15.07.2026.
(Ravinder Singh-I)
District Judge-03
East District, KKD Courts,
Delhi, 11.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9, CS 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
07.04.2026
Present: Ms. Nashra, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Manish Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 & 3
through VC.
Defendant no.2 is exparte.
It is noted that defendant no.1 & 3 filed their affidavit qua
admission and denial of documents on 06.04.2026. Copy stated to be sent
through electronic mode.
Defendant no.1 & 3 also filed reply to the application u/o VI
Rule 17 CPC as well as reply to the proposed amended plaint. Copy
already supplied.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff seeks adjournment for
arguments.
Put up for arguments on the application u/o VI Rule 17 CPC
for 11.05.2026.
(Ravinder Singh-I)
District Judge-03
East District, KKD Courts,
Delhi, 07.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7, CS 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
18.02.2026
Present: Sh. Dipanshu Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Manish Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 & 3.
Defendant no.2 is already exparte.
Plaintiff filed an application u/o VI Rule 17 r/w section 151
of CPC alongwith proposed amended plaint.
Notice of aforesaid application accepted by Ld. Counsel for
defendant no.1 & 3. Copy supplied.
On filing of PF, let notice of this application be issued to the
defendant no.2.
Cost of Rs.1,500/- is paid on behalf of the defendant no.1 &
3 to the plaintiff.
List this matter for reply and arguments on aforesaid
application on 07.04.2026.
(Ravinder Singh-I)
District Judge-03
East District, KKD Courts,
Delhi, 18.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
26.11.2025
File taken up today as 25.11.2025 was declared holiday on
account of Guru Teg Bahadur’s Martyrdom Day.
Present: Ms. Kulwant Kaur, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Manish Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 & 3
through VC.
Some more time is sought to file reply to the application of
the defendant u/o 8 Rule 1 of CPC.
Let reply be filed with advance copy to the other side.
Put up for reply/arguments on the aforesaid application on
14.01.2026.
(Ravinder Singh-I)
District Judge-03
East District, KKD Courts,
Delhi, 26.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No.92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
23.09.2025
Present: Ms. Kulwant Kaur, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff in person.
None for defendants.
Replication to the written statement of defendants no. 1
and 3 is filed. Let copy be supplied.
An application under Order 8 Rule 1 r/w Section 151 CPC
has been filed by the defendants no. 1 and 3 alongwith
documents.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff submits that even
though copy of the application and documents have been
received, however, the documents received are not legible.
She requests that direction be given to the defendants to
supply legible hard copies of the documents to the plaintiff.
Let legible hard copy of the documents be supplied to the
plaintiff/her Counsel Mr. Dilip Anand within two weeks from
today and against acknowledgment.
To come up for arguments on the pending applications
on 25.11.2025.
(Shirish Aggarwal)
District Judge-03
East District, KKD Courts,
Delhi, 23.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
31.05.2025
Present: Shri Dipanshu Gupta, ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
None for defendants.
Written Statement on behalf of D1 & 3 has already filed on
03.05.2025. Copy has already been supplied.
Process issued to D2 received back with the report served
through his wife.
Put up for filing of WS on behalf of D2 on 15.07.2025.
(Pooja Jain)
District Judge-03/NB
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
31.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
23.04.2025
Present: Sh. Deepanshu Gupta Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Sh. Nitesh Srivastava Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 & 3.
None for defendant no.2.
Memo of appearance filed on behalf of defendant no.1 & 3.
Process issued to defendant no.2 received back with report
‘his wife stated that defendant no.2 Ravinder Singh is out of country
(US) and will be coming back after two years’.
In view of the above, issue fresh summons of the suit to the
defendant no.2 on filing PF & RC as well as through speed post and
authorized courier.
Let the WS of the defendant no.1 & 3 be filed within
prescribed period with advance copy to the plaintiff/counsel.
Put up on 31.05.2025.
(Pooja Jain)
District Judge-03/NB
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
23.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms. Paramjeet Kaur
11.03.2025
Present: Ms. Kulwant Kaur, proxy counsel for plaintiff.
An application for filing amended memo of parties filed on
behalf of plaintiff.
Heard on the application.
It is submitted that plaintiff has filed the suit against the
defendants and the same is pending for consideration before Hon’ble
court and now is fixed for 11.03.2025. It is further submitted that at the
time of filing the present suit, inadvertently, Mr. Jaswant Singh was
mentioned as father of defendant no.1 instead of her husband. It is further
submitted that plaintiff is filing the correct amended memo of parties.
Hence, the present application.
Heard. Record is perused and considered.
In view of submissions made as well as for the reasons
mentioned in the application, the same is allowed.
Amended memo of parties is taken on record.
Issue summons of the suit as well as notice of the
application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC to the defendant by all modes upon
PF/RC within 7 days, returnable on 23.04.2025.
(Pooja Jain)
District Judge-03/NB
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
11.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms. Paramjeet Kaur
19.02.2025
Present: Shri Depanshu Gupta, ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Advocates are abstaining from work today.
Fresh suit is received by way of assignment. It be checked
and registered.
It is submitted by ld. Counsel for plaintiff that there is
requirement of filing of amended memo of parties as there is some
typographical error in the parentage of D1.
Put up for filing of amended memo of parties on 11.03.2025.
(Pooja Jain)
District Judge-03/NB
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
19.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 17 CS 92/25 Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
15.07.2026
Present: Plaintiff with Ld. Counsel Mr. Dilip Anand.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Ld. Proxy Counsel for Mr. Manish
Gupta- Ld. Counsel for defendant-1 & 3
Defendant-2 is exparte.
Today, the matter is listed for arguments on application under
Order VI Rule 17 CPC. However, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff
submits that due to certain technicalities, he wishes to withdraw the
aforesaid application with liberty to file fresh application. Heard.
In view of above submission of Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff,
the aforesaid application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC is disposed of
as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
List this matter for arguments on application under Order
XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC and for framing of issues on 19.08.2026
(Ravinder Singh - I)
District Judge-03/East District,
KKD Courts, Delhi/15.07.2026/j
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 16, CS 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
11.05.2026
Present: Ms. Kulwant Kaur, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff
through VC.
Sh. Manish Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the defendant no.1 & 3
through VC.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff requests for an adjournment
stating that main counsel is not available as suffering from chicken pox.
Request is not opposed.
Matter is adjourned for arguments on 15.07.2026.
(Ravinder Singh-I)
District Judge-03
East District, KKD Courts,
Delhi, 11.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 9, CS 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
07.04.2026
Present: Ms. Nashra, Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Manish Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 & 3
through VC.
Defendant no.2 is exparte.
It is noted that defendant no.1 & 3 filed their affidavit qua
admission and denial of documents on 06.04.2026. Copy stated to be sent
through electronic mode.
Defendant no.1 & 3 also filed reply to the application u/o VI
Rule 17 CPC as well as reply to the proposed amended plaint. Copy
already supplied.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff seeks adjournment for
arguments.
Put up for arguments on the application u/o VI Rule 17 CPC
for 11.05.2026.
(Ravinder Singh-I)
District Judge-03
East District, KKD Courts,
Delhi, 07.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 7, CS 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
18.02.2026
Present: Sh. Dipanshu Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Manish Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 & 3.
Defendant no.2 is already exparte.
Plaintiff filed an application u/o VI Rule 17 r/w section 151
of CPC alongwith proposed amended plaint.
Notice of aforesaid application accepted by Ld. Counsel for
defendant no.1 & 3. Copy supplied.
On filing of PF, let notice of this application be issued to the
defendant no.2.
Cost of Rs.1,500/- is paid on behalf of the defendant no.1 &
3 to the plaintiff.
List this matter for reply and arguments on aforesaid
application on 07.04.2026.
(Ravinder Singh-I)
District Judge-03
East District, KKD Courts,
Delhi, 18.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
26.11.2025
File taken up today as 25.11.2025 was declared holiday on
account of Guru Teg Bahadur’s Martyrdom Day.
Present: Ms. Kulwant Kaur, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Manish Gupta, Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 & 3
through VC.
Some more time is sought to file reply to the application of
the defendant u/o 8 Rule 1 of CPC.
Let reply be filed with advance copy to the other side.
Put up for reply/arguments on the aforesaid application on
14.01.2026.
(Ravinder Singh-I)
District Judge-03
East District, KKD Courts,
Delhi, 26.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No.92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
23.09.2025
Present: Ms. Kulwant Kaur, Ld. Proxy Counsel for plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff in person.
None for defendants.
Replication to the written statement of defendants no. 1
and 3 is filed. Let copy be supplied.
An application under Order 8 Rule 1 r/w Section 151 CPC
has been filed by the defendants no. 1 and 3 alongwith
documents.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for the plaintiff submits that even
though copy of the application and documents have been
received, however, the documents received are not legible.
She requests that direction be given to the defendants to
supply legible hard copies of the documents to the plaintiff.
Let legible hard copy of the documents be supplied to the
plaintiff/her Counsel Mr. Dilip Anand within two weeks from
today and against acknowledgment.
To come up for arguments on the pending applications
on 25.11.2025.
(Shirish Aggarwal)
District Judge-03
East District, KKD Courts,
Delhi, 23.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
31.05.2025
Present: Shri Dipanshu Gupta, ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
None for defendants.
Written Statement on behalf of D1 & 3 has already filed on
03.05.2025. Copy has already been supplied.
Process issued to D2 received back with the report served
through his wife.
Put up for filing of WS on behalf of D2 on 15.07.2025.
(Pooja Jain)
District Judge-03/NB
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
31.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms Paramjeet Kaur
23.04.2025
Present: Sh. Deepanshu Gupta Ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Sh. Nitesh Srivastava Ld. Counsel for defendant no.1 & 3.
None for defendant no.2.
Memo of appearance filed on behalf of defendant no.1 & 3.
Process issued to defendant no.2 received back with report
‘his wife stated that defendant no.2 Ravinder Singh is out of country
(US) and will be coming back after two years’.
In view of the above, issue fresh summons of the suit to the
defendant no.2 on filing PF & RC as well as through speed post and
authorized courier.
Let the WS of the defendant no.1 & 3 be filed within
prescribed period with advance copy to the plaintiff/counsel.
Put up on 31.05.2025.
(Pooja Jain)
District Judge-03/NB
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
23.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms. Paramjeet Kaur
11.03.2025
Present: Ms. Kulwant Kaur, proxy counsel for plaintiff.
An application for filing amended memo of parties filed on
behalf of plaintiff.
Heard on the application.
It is submitted that plaintiff has filed the suit against the
defendants and the same is pending for consideration before Hon’ble
court and now is fixed for 11.03.2025. It is further submitted that at the
time of filing the present suit, inadvertently, Mr. Jaswant Singh was
mentioned as father of defendant no.1 instead of her husband. It is further
submitted that plaintiff is filing the correct amended memo of parties.
Hence, the present application.
Heard. Record is perused and considered.
In view of submissions made as well as for the reasons
mentioned in the application, the same is allowed.
Amended memo of parties is taken on record.
Issue summons of the suit as well as notice of the
application u/o 39 rule 1 & 2 CPC to the defendant by all modes upon
PF/RC within 7 days, returnable on 23.04.2025.
(Pooja Jain)
District Judge-03/NB
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
11.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS No. 92/25
Ritu Parmar Vs. Ms. Paramjeet Kaur
19.02.2025
Present: Shri Depanshu Gupta, ld. Counsel for plaintiff through VC.
Advocates are abstaining from work today.
Fresh suit is received by way of assignment. It be checked
and registered.
It is submitted by ld. Counsel for plaintiff that there is
requirement of filing of amended memo of parties as there is some
typographical error in the parentage of D1.
Put up for filing of amended memo of parties on 11.03.2025.
(Pooja Jain)
District Judge-03/NB
East/KKD Courts/Delhi
19.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --