Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 5 Succ. Court 130/24 BABY Vs. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) 29.11.2025 @ 12.23 PM Present : Mr. Faizan, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Mr. Kishori Lal, Civil Nazir, MACT-02, Central, THC. Mr. Kishori Lal, Civil Nazir, MACT-02, Central, THC examined and discharged as PW-3. He is not paid any diet money upon his own request. The present matter reveals very unfortunate series of events. Ld. Counsel for petitioner has apprised…
BABY +2 moreVsTHE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)
TrustJury record updated 16 Oct 2026
Case Overview
- Registration Number
- 130/2024
- Registration Date
- 29 Oct 2024
Advocates
1For Petitioner
For Respondent
Not available
Parties
4Respondent
Acts & Sections
1Case History / Proceedings
Case History
Date: 29-10-2024 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2025 Date: 14-01-2025 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc./ Arguments Next Hearing Date: 29-03-2025 Date: 29-03-2025 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 29-05-2025 Date: 29-05-2025 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 21-08-2025 Date: 21-08-2025 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 18-10-2025 Date: 18-10-2025 Business: further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 30-10-2025 Date: 30-10-2025 Business: Further proceedings Next Purpose: Misc. cases/purpose Next Hearing Date: 29-11-2025 Date: 29-11-2025 Business: disposed off as withdrawn Nature Of Disposal: WITHDRAW Disposal Date: 29-11-2025
Additional Case Details
Additional Case Details
Filing Number: 8164/2024 Filing Date: 28-10-2024 eFiling Number: ADL20230004401C202400046 eFiling Date: 26-10-2024 First Hearing Date: 29th October 2024 Decision Date: 29th November 2025 Court Number And Judge: 327-ACJ-cum-CCJ-cum-ARC
Orders
15Interim Order 730 Oct 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Succ. Court 130/24 BABY AND ORS. VS. STATE AND ANR. 30.10.2025 @ 02.17 PM File is taken up today on an application on behalf of petitioner for summoning of witness. NDOH is 29.11.2025. Present : Ms. Priya Malik, Ms. Sahiba Aggarwal and Mr. Pranav, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Record is perused. Application is allowed. On filing of PF, let the witness stated in the application be summoned for the date already fixed i.e. 29.11.2025. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 30.10.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 618 Oct 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Succ. Court 130/24 BABY Vs. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) 18.10.2025 Present : Mr. Syed Ajmal Hassan, Ms. Priya Malik, Ms. Sahiba and Mr. Hashim Ali, Ld. Counsel for petitioners alongwith petitioners. Mr. Satpal Singh, Bailiff, SDM, Kotwali. Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Singh, Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Sharma Shakti Bhawan. Cost receipt filed by the petitioner. Be checked and taken on record. Mr. Satpal Singh, Bailiff, SDM, Kotwali examined and discharged as RW-1. He is paid diet money of Rs.1,000/-. Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Singh, Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Sharma Shakti Bhawan examined and discharged as RW-2. He is paid diet money of Rs.1,000/-. Copy of death certificate of wife of the deceased alongwith affidavit regarding death of mother of the deceased filed on behalf of petitioners. Petitioners no. 2 and 3 examined and discharged as PW-1 and PW-2 respectively. Ld. Counsel for petitioners seeks some time to file appropriate application for summoning of witness. Heard. Allowed. Let application, if any, be filed by the petitioners within two weeks from today. Be adjourned for further evidence for 29.11.2025. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 18.10.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 521 Aug 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 3 Succ. Court 130/24 BABY Vs. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) 21.08.2025 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Cost imposed upon the petitioner vide order dated 29.05.2025 is stated to have been deposited. Let the same be verified and receipt be filed. As per report of the Ahlmad, petitioner has failed to take steps in terms of order dated 29.05.2025. Further, petitioner has also failed to disclose the details of mother and wife of the deceased. Petitioner is again directed to comply with the order dated 29.05.2025 within a week from today. Be adjourned for 18.10.2025. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 21.08.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 5 Succ. Court 130/24 BABY Vs. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) 29.05.2025 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioners. An application under Order I Rule 10 CPC read with Order VI Rule 17 CPC has been filed on behalf of petitioners on 06.05.2025. It is stated that the only amendment sought by the petitioners is that respondent no.2 / Ld. Presiding Officer, MACT, Central, THC is sought to be deleted as…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Succ. Court 130/24 BABY Vs. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) 29.03.2025 Present : Mr. Rahul Rohtagi and Mr. Syed Ajmal Hasan, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Matter is listed for arguments on the aspect of the petitioner making the respondent no.2/ court of Ld. MACT, Tis Hazari Courts, in the present petition as a necessary party. This court has heard the submissions of the petitioner on this aspect on 14.01.2025 as…
Interim Order 214 Jan 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 15 Succ. Court 130/24 BABY Vs. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) 14.01.2025 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. In the present case, petitioner has made the concerned Ld. MACT Court as respondent no.2 on the ground that the amount deposited by the insurance company is lying in the concerned MACT Court i.e. respondent no.2 herein. Ld. Counsel for petitioner has argued that the concerned court can be rather impleaded as a respondent in the present petition, however this Court is not convinced with such argument. Now, Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that there are certain judgments of the Hon'ble High Court which allows the concerned court to be arrayed as respondent. Let the judgments be filed by the petitioner on or before NDOH. Be put up for arguments on the point of maintainability and arguments on the aforesaid aspect on 29.03.2025. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 14.01.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Interim Order 129 Oct 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: SC No. 130/24 BABY AND ORS. VS. STATE AND ANR. 29.10.2024 Fresh succession petition is received. It be checked and registered. Present : Mr. Syed Ajmal Hasan, Ld. Counsel for the petitioners. Petitioners are directed to clarify as to why a Court has been made a respondent in the present case. Put up for arguments on the point of maintainability of the present petition on 14.01.2025. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 29.10.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 730 Oct 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Succ. Court 130/24 BABY AND ORS. VS. STATE AND ANR. 30.10.2025 @ 02.17 PM File is taken up today on an application on behalf of petitioner for summoning of witness. NDOH is 29.11.2025. Present : Ms. Priya Malik, Ms. Sahiba Aggarwal and Mr. Pranav, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Record is perused. Application is allowed. On filing of PF, let the witness stated in the application be summoned for the date already fixed i.e. 29.11.2025. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 30.10.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 618 Oct 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Succ. Court 130/24 BABY Vs. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) 18.10.2025 Present : Mr. Syed Ajmal Hassan, Ms. Priya Malik, Ms. Sahiba and Mr. Hashim Ali, Ld. Counsel for petitioners alongwith petitioners. Mr. Satpal Singh, Bailiff, SDM, Kotwali. Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Singh, Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Sharma Shakti Bhawan. Cost receipt filed by the petitioner. Be checked and taken on record. Mr. Satpal Singh, Bailiff, SDM, Kotwali examined and discharged as RW-1. He is paid diet money of Rs.1,000/-. Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Singh, Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Sharma Shakti Bhawan examined and discharged as RW-2. He is paid diet money of Rs.1,000/-. Copy of death certificate of wife of the deceased alongwith affidavit regarding death of mother of the deceased filed on behalf of petitioners. Petitioners no. 2 and 3 examined and discharged as PW-1 and PW-2 respectively. Ld. Counsel for petitioners seeks some time to file appropriate application for summoning of witness. Heard. Allowed. Let application, if any, be filed by the petitioners within two weeks from today. Be adjourned for further evidence for 29.11.2025. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 18.10.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 521 Aug 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 3 Succ. Court 130/24 BABY Vs. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) 21.08.2025 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Cost imposed upon the petitioner vide order dated 29.05.2025 is stated to have been deposited. Let the same be verified and receipt be filed. As per report of the Ahlmad, petitioner has failed to take steps in terms of order dated 29.05.2025. Further, petitioner has also failed to disclose the details of mother and wife of the deceased. Petitioner is again directed to comply with the order dated 29.05.2025 within a week from today. Be adjourned for 18.10.2025. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 21.08.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 5 Succ. Court 130/24 BABY Vs. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) 29.05.2025 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioners. An application under Order I Rule 10 CPC read with Order VI Rule 17 CPC has been filed on behalf of petitioners on 06.05.2025. It is stated that the only amendment sought by the petitioners is that respondent no.2 / Ld. Presiding Officer, MACT, Central, THC is sought to be deleted as…
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: Succ. Court 130/24 BABY Vs. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) 29.03.2025 Present : Mr. Rahul Rohtagi and Mr. Syed Ajmal Hasan, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. Matter is listed for arguments on the aspect of the petitioner making the respondent no.2/ court of Ld. MACT, Tis Hazari Courts, in the present petition as a necessary party. This court has heard the submissions of the petitioner on this aspect on 14.01.2025 as…
Order 214 Jan 2025
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 15 Succ. Court 130/24 BABY Vs. THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) 14.01.2025 Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. In the present case, petitioner has made the concerned Ld. MACT Court as respondent no.2 on the ground that the amount deposited by the insurance company is lying in the concerned MACT Court i.e. respondent no.2 herein. Ld. Counsel for petitioner has argued that the concerned court can be rather impleaded as a respondent in the present petition, however this Court is not convinced with such argument. Now, Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that there are certain judgments of the Hon'ble High Court which allows the concerned court to be arrayed as respondent. Let the judgments be filed by the petitioner on or before NDOH. Be put up for arguments on the point of maintainability and arguments on the aforesaid aspect on 29.03.2025. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 14.01.2025 -- 1 of 1 --
Order 129 Oct 2024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: SC No. 130/24 BABY AND ORS. VS. STATE AND ANR. 29.10.2024 Fresh succession petition is received. It be checked and registered. Present : Mr. Syed Ajmal Hasan, Ld. Counsel for the petitioners. Petitioners are directed to clarify as to why a Court has been made a respondent in the present case. Put up for arguments on the point of maintainability of the present petition on 14.01.2025. (Bharat Aggarwal) ACJ-cum-ARC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts 29.10.2024 -- 1 of 1 --
TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.
