Interim Order 4

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 CS SCJ 1627/25 Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
07.01.2026
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Pushpendra R Sharma, Ld. counsel for
defendant.
Fresh Vakaltnama filed on behalf of the defendant. Same
be taken on record.
Sh. Narendra Kumar has appeared in person and stated
that he is the brother of the defendant no. 1.
Ld. counsel for the defendant submits that he has not
received the copy of the plaint and therefore, WS could not be filed.
Perusal of the record shows that the summons were
served upon the defendant through their relative on 14.10.2025. The
RC issued against them received back with the report of refusal on
13.10.2025.
The statutory period to file the WS has already expired
on 13.11.2025.
Today also no WS has been filed on behalf of the
defendants on the ground that copy of the plaint has not been received,
whereas on the summons it was clearly stated by the process server
that copy of the summon and the plaint has been received by the said
relative.
Therefore, there is no merit in the submission of the ld.
Counsel for defendants. Accordingly, the right to file WS of the
defendants is hereby closed.
Plaintiff is directed to file list of witnesses alongwith
evidence affidavit on or before the NDOH with advance copy to the
opposite party.
Put up for plaintiff’s evidence on 25.02.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)/THC/
Delhi/07.01.2026
-- 1 of 1 --