DAZI VERMA +2 moreVsROHIT KUMAR +1 more

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8 CS SCJ 1627/25
Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
22.07.2026
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Singh, Ld. counsel for defendants through
VC.
Today the matter is fixed for cross examination of
PW-1.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submits that PW-1 could
not appear before the court due to examination of her children.
Further, she has to appear from Uttrakhand.
In view of the above, matter is adjourned for today.
Put up for PE on 23.09.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/22.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS SCJ 1627/25
Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
20.05.2026
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff in person.
None for defendants.
PW1 examined in chief. Her cross examination is
deferred as none has appeared on behalf of the defendants.
Last and final opportunity is given to the defendants
to cross examine the plaintiff subject to payment of traveling
expenses and diet money of Rs.3000/- to the plaintiff on or
before the NDOH.
Put up for PE on 22.07.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/20.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 1627/25
Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
25.03.2026
File received back from the National Lok Adalat
held on 22.03.2026.
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submit that no one has
appeared on behalf of the defendant in the National Lok Adalat
held on 22.03.2026.
Perusal of the record shows that right to file WS by
the defendant was already closed on 07.01.2026 and matter was
listed for plaintiff’s evidence.
In the interest of justice, one last and final
opportunity is granted to the defendants to appear and pursue the
present matter otherwise they may be proceeded ex-parte.
List for PE on date fixed i.e. 08.04.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/25.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 27 CS SCJ 1627/25 Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
File taken up today as 02.03.2026 was declared holiday.
14.03.2026
Regular Stenographer of this court is on leave on today.
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff through
VC.
None for defendant.
Vide last order matter was referred to National Lok
Adalat to be held today. However, vide notification dated
10.03.2026 issued by DLSA the said National Lok Adalat has
now been scheduled on 22.03.2026.
In view of the above, parties are requested to appear
in the National Lok Adalat on 22.03.2026.
Accordingly the mater is referred to National Lok
Adalat on 22.03.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/14.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 1627/25
Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
25.02.2026
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Ms. Aarti, Ld. proxy counsel for defendant.
Ld. Proxy counsel for the defendant seeks
adjournment as grandmother of the main counsel has passed
away.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff also submits that plaintiff
could not come for examination as exams of her daughter are
going on.
At request, matter is referred to National Lok Adalat
scheduled to be held on 14.03.2026.
In view of the above, put up for PE on 08.04.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/25.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3 CS SCJ 1627/25
Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
12.11.2025
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Summons served on 14.10.2025 upon the defendant
no. 1 and 2 through their cousin and nephew respectively. Same
be taken on record.
RC issued against the defendant no.1 and 2 received
back with the report of ‘Refusal’ on 13.10.2025.
Statutory period to file WS by the defendant has still
not expired. Defendants are at liberty to file WS within statutory
period alongwith advance copy to the opposite side.
None has appeared on behalf fo the defendants.
Last and final opportunity is given to the defendants
to appear in the case otherwise, they may be proceeded ex-parte
on the NDOH.
Put up for appearance of the defendant on
07.01.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/12.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 1627/25
Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
24.09.2025
Present: Sh. Mukesh Daral, Ld. counsel for plaintiffs.
Submissions on plaint heard on behalf of the
plaintiffs.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiffs argued that plaintiff
no.1 being the legal wedded wife of defendant no.1 and mother
of plaintiff no.2 and 3 (minors) has the apprehension that
defendants may sell the ancestral property/ self acquired property
of the father-in-law of the plaintiff. It is submitted that defendant
no.1 is heavy drunkard and he may sell all the properties which
will adversly effect the rights of the minor children in future.
Issue summons to the defendant through all modes
including electronic mode i.e. Whatsapp/E-mail upon filing of
PF/RC within 15 days returnable for NDOH.
In case summons are served through electronic
mode, plaintiff is directed to file affidavit of proof of service on
the NDOH.
Put up on 12.11.2025.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/24.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 1627/2025
Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
04.09.2025
Fresh suit received by way of e-filing. It be checked
and registered.
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Physical copy of plaint alongwith documents has
been filed. Same is taken on record.
Submissions on plaint heard. Record perused.
The present suit has been filed by the plai ntiff in
respect of ancestral properties of her deceased father-in-law. Ld.
counsel for the plaintiff is unable to show how the
plaintiff/daughter-in-law has any right in respect of the said
property.
Put up for arguments on the maintainability of the
present suit on 24.09.2025.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/04.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8 CS SCJ 1627/25
Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
CNR No.DLCT030053752025
23.09.2026
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Ravi Kumar, Ld. proxy counsel for defendant.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submits that plaintiff is
not available due to exam of her daughter and seeks adjournment
for today.
At request, put up for PE on 02.12.2026.
(GAURAV DAHIYA)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/23.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8 CS SCJ 1627/25
Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
22.07.2026
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Varun Singh, Ld. counsel for defendants through
VC.
Today the matter is fixed for cross examination of
PW-1.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submits that PW-1 could
not appear before the court due to examination of her children.
Further, she has to appear from Uttrakhand.
In view of the above, matter is adjourned for today.
Put up for PE on 23.09.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/22.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS SCJ 1627/25
Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
20.05.2026
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff
alongwith plaintiff in person.
None for defendants.
PW1 examined in chief. Her cross examination is
deferred as none has appeared on behalf of the defendants.
Last and final opportunity is given to the defendants
to cross examine the plaintiff subject to payment of traveling
expenses and diet money of Rs.3000/- to the plaintiff on or
before the NDOH.
Put up for PE on 22.07.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/20.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 1627/25
Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
25.03.2026
File received back from the National Lok Adalat
held on 22.03.2026.
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff submit that no one has
appeared on behalf of the defendant in the National Lok Adalat
held on 22.03.2026.
Perusal of the record shows that right to file WS by
the defendant was already closed on 07.01.2026 and matter was
listed for plaintiff’s evidence.
In the interest of justice, one last and final
opportunity is granted to the defendants to appear and pursue the
present matter otherwise they may be proceeded ex-parte.
List for PE on date fixed i.e. 08.04.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/25.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 27 CS SCJ 1627/25 Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
File taken up today as 02.03.2026 was declared holiday.
14.03.2026
Regular Stenographer of this court is on leave on today.
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff through
VC.
None for defendant.
Vide last order matter was referred to National Lok
Adalat to be held today. However, vide notification dated
10.03.2026 issued by DLSA the said National Lok Adalat has
now been scheduled on 22.03.2026.
In view of the above, parties are requested to appear
in the National Lok Adalat on 22.03.2026.
Accordingly the mater is referred to National Lok
Adalat on 22.03.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/14.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 CS SCJ 1627/25
Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
25.02.2026
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Ms. Aarti, Ld. proxy counsel for defendant.
Ld. Proxy counsel for the defendant seeks
adjournment as grandmother of the main counsel has passed
away.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff also submits that plaintiff
could not come for examination as exams of her daughter are
going on.
At request, matter is referred to National Lok Adalat
scheduled to be held on 14.03.2026.
In view of the above, put up for PE on 08.04.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/25.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 3 CS SCJ 1627/25
Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
12.11.2025
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Summons served on 14.10.2025 upon the defendant
no. 1 and 2 through their cousin and nephew respectively. Same
be taken on record.
RC issued against the defendant no.1 and 2 received
back with the report of ‘Refusal’ on 13.10.2025.
Statutory period to file WS by the defendant has still
not expired. Defendants are at liberty to file WS within statutory
period alongwith advance copy to the opposite side.
None has appeared on behalf fo the defendants.
Last and final opportunity is given to the defendants
to appear in the case otherwise, they may be proceeded ex-parte
on the NDOH.
Put up for appearance of the defendant on
07.01.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/12.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 1627/25
Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
24.09.2025
Present: Sh. Mukesh Daral, Ld. counsel for plaintiffs.
Submissions on plaint heard on behalf of the
plaintiffs.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiffs argued that plaintiff
no.1 being the legal wedded wife of defendant no.1 and mother
of plaintiff no.2 and 3 (minors) has the apprehension that
defendants may sell the ancestral property/ self acquired property
of the father-in-law of the plaintiff. It is submitted that defendant
no.1 is heavy drunkard and he may sell all the properties which
will adversly effect the rights of the minor children in future.
Issue summons to the defendant through all modes
including electronic mode i.e. Whatsapp/E-mail upon filing of
PF/RC within 15 days returnable for NDOH.
In case summons are served through electronic
mode, plaintiff is directed to file affidavit of proof of service on
the NDOH.
Put up on 12.11.2025.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/24.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 1627/2025
Dazi Verma Vs. Rohit Kumar
04.09.2025
Fresh suit received by way of e-filing. It be checked
and registered.
Present: Sh. Rahul Parashar, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Physical copy of plaint alongwith documents has
been filed. Same is taken on record.
Submissions on plaint heard. Record perused.
The present suit has been filed by the plai ntiff in
respect of ancestral properties of her deceased father-in-law. Ld.
counsel for the plaintiff is unable to show how the
plaintiff/daughter-in-law has any right in respect of the said
property.
Put up for arguments on the maintainability of the
present suit on 24.09.2025.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/04.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --