Ajay GuptaVsSANTOSH KUMAR

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
25.07.2026
Present: Ms. Shweta Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff through
VC.
Sh. Chirag Sharma, Ld. counsel for defendant
through VC.
Mediation referral order received back with the
order dated 08.07.2026 as per which present matter has been
settled between the parties for a sum of Rs.60,000/-. The said
amount has to be paid in 02 installments of Rs.30,000/- on
25.07.2026 and 20.08.2026.
At request of Ld. counsel for the parties, put up for
report of verification of the payment/ recording of withdrawal
statement on 11.09.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/25.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 18 CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
Regular Stenographer is on leave today.
30.05.2026
Present: Ms. Shweta Garg, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Chirag Sharma,Ld. Counsel for the defendant
(through VC).
Both the parties request that matter may be referred
to mediation as there is chance of settlement in the present case.
In view of the above, the present matter is referred to
mediation on 10.06.2026 at 12:00 PM.
Put up on 25.07.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/30.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
04.04.2026
Present: None for plaintiff.
Sh. Yash Priya Sahran, Ld. counsel for defendant.
Ld. counsel for defendant submits that settlement
talks are going on between the parties. Further, defendant has
challenged order dated 07.02.2026 in the Hon'ble High Court of
Delhi.
None has appeared on behalf of the plaintiff.
Last opportunity is given to the plaintiff to lead PE.
Put up for PE on 30.05.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/04.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
07.02.2026
Present: Ms. Shweta Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Mainak Sarkar, Ld. counsel for defendant
through VC.
Reply to the application U/O VIII Rule 1 CPC and
U/S 151 CPC filed on behalf of the plaintiff alongwith certificate
U/S Certificate U/S 63 (4) of the BSA, 2023 and proof of service.
Same be taken on record. Copy already supplied to the opposite
party.
Arguments on aforesaid applications heard on behalf
of both the parties.
Vide separate order of even date the aforesaid
applications are dismissed.
Copy of evidence affidavit be supplied in advance to
the opposite party.
Put up for PE on 04.04.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/07.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
20.12.2025
Present: Ms. Shweta Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Yash Priya Sahran, Ld. counsel for defendant.
WS, application U/O 8 Rule 1, application U/S 151
CPC seeking recall of order dt. 15.10.2025 and vakalatnama filed
on behalf of the defendant. Same be taken on record. Copy
supplied to the ld. counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for the pla intiff seeks some time to file
reply to the aforesaid application.
She is at liberty to do so alongwith advance copy to
the opposite side.
In view of the above, put up for arguments on the
aforesaid application on 07.02.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/20.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
03.12.2025
Matter taken up in Pre-sitting Lok Adalat.
At 4:00 PM.
Present: Ms. Shweta Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Saurabh, Ld. proxy counsel for defendant.
Due to the absence of the defendant and his main
counsel, no settlement talks could take place.
In view of the above, put up on date fixed on
20.12.2025.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/03.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 869/2025
Ajay Gupta Vs. Santosh Kumar
24.11.2025
File taken up Suo-Moto.
Present: None.
Perusal of the record shows that there are chances of
settlement between the parties in the present matter and this is a
fit case for taken up in upcoming National Lok Adalat scheduled
to be held on 13.12.2025.
In view of the above, issue court notice (without PF)
to both the parties and their counsels for Pre-Sitting Lok Adalat
on 03.12.2025 at 4:00 PM.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/24.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
27.08.2025
Advocates are stated to be abstaining from work today.
Present: Ld. proxy counsel for plaintiff via VC.
Ld. proxy counsel for defendant via VC.
Ld. proxy counsel for the defendant submits that he has
received the copy of the plaint. However, page no.15, 16 and 24 are
not legible as per the Ld. proxy counsel for the defendant.
Plaintiff is directed to supply the aforesaid pages in soft
copy to the Ld. counsel for the defendant during the course of the day.
Defendant is directed to file WS within 30 days from
today alongwith advance copy to the opposite side.
Plaintiff is at liberty to file replication, if any to the WS
of the defendant alongwith advance copy to the opposite side. on or
before the NDOH
Put up on 15.10.2025.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/27.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
10.06.2025
Present: Ms. Shweta Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
An application U/O 6 Rule 17 CPC filed on behalf
of the Ld. counsel for the plaintiff. Same be taken on record.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submits that through the
aforesaid amendments, plaintiff wants to amend the para no. 10
and 13 of the plaint to clarify the role of AURA INFRA BIZ LLP
which is the consignee.
Heard.
In view of the opinion of the court, no injury or
prejudice would be caused to the defendant if the aforesaid
amendments, which are just technical in nature, are allowed in
the plaint. Therefore, the aforesaid application U/O 6 Rule 17
CPC is allowed and amendment plaint is taken on record.
Submissions on the plaint heard.
Issue summons to the defendant (s) upon filing of
PF/RC within 15 days returnable for NDOH.
Now to come up on 27.08.2025.
(Sunil Khatri)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/10.06.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 869/2025
Ajay Gupta Vs. Santosh Kumar
14.05.2025
Fresh suit received by way of e-filing. It be checked
and registered.
Present: Ms. Shewta Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Physical copy of plaint alongwith documents has been
filed. Same is taken on record. Ahlmad states that the same is in
order and complete.
In Para 10 of the plaint, following has been
mentioned:
“That the cause of action for this suit basically arose
during the year 2024 at Delhi during which period on the request/s
of the defendant through telephone, the plaintiff(s) delivered
“goods” from its place upon the defendant direction AURA INFRA
BIZ LLP to the defendant against the first (unpaid) bill of the
plaintiff.”
It cannot be ascertained as to what is the role of
AURA INFRA BIZ LLP. Ld. counsel for plaintiff states that AURA
INFRA BIZ LLP was the consignee. Admittedly, this fact has not
been mentioned in the plaint.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff seeks time to move
application for amendment of the plaint. Considered.
Let appropriate application be moved on or before the
NDOH.
Now to come up on 10.06.2025.
(KAPIL GUPTA)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/14.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
25.07.2026
Present: Ms. Shweta Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff through
VC.
Sh. Chirag Sharma, Ld. counsel for defendant
through VC.
Mediation referral order received back with the
order dated 08.07.2026 as per which present matter has been
settled between the parties for a sum of Rs.60,000/-. The said
amount has to be paid in 02 installments of Rs.30,000/- on
25.07.2026 and 20.08.2026.
At request of Ld. counsel for the parties, put up for
report of verification of the payment/ recording of withdrawal
statement on 11.09.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/25.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 18 CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
Regular Stenographer is on leave today.
30.05.2026
Present: Ms. Shweta Garg, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Sh. Chirag Sharma,Ld. Counsel for the defendant
(through VC).
Both the parties request that matter may be referred
to mediation as there is chance of settlement in the present case.
In view of the above, the present matter is referred to
mediation on 10.06.2026 at 12:00 PM.
Put up on 25.07.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/30.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
04.04.2026
Present: None for plaintiff.
Sh. Yash Priya Sahran, Ld. counsel for defendant.
Ld. counsel for defendant submits that settlement
talks are going on between the parties. Further, defendant has
challenged order dated 07.02.2026 in the Hon'ble High Court of
Delhi.
None has appeared on behalf of the plaintiff.
Last opportunity is given to the plaintiff to lead PE.
Put up for PE on 30.05.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/04.04.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 14 CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
07.02.2026
Present: Ms. Shweta Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Mainak Sarkar, Ld. counsel for defendant
through VC.
Reply to the application U/O VIII Rule 1 CPC and
U/S 151 CPC filed on behalf of the plaintiff alongwith certificate
U/S Certificate U/S 63 (4) of the BSA, 2023 and proof of service.
Same be taken on record. Copy already supplied to the opposite
party.
Arguments on aforesaid applications heard on behalf
of both the parties.
Vide separate order of even date the aforesaid
applications are dismissed.
Copy of evidence affidavit be supplied in advance to
the opposite party.
Put up for PE on 04.04.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/07.02.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
20.12.2025
Present: Ms. Shweta Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Yash Priya Sahran, Ld. counsel for defendant.
WS, application U/O 8 Rule 1, application U/S 151
CPC seeking recall of order dt. 15.10.2025 and vakalatnama filed
on behalf of the defendant. Same be taken on record. Copy
supplied to the ld. counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. counsel for the pla intiff seeks some time to file
reply to the aforesaid application.
She is at liberty to do so alongwith advance copy to
the opposite side.
In view of the above, put up for arguments on the
aforesaid application on 07.02.2026.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/20.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
03.12.2025
Matter taken up in Pre-sitting Lok Adalat.
At 4:00 PM.
Present: Ms. Shweta Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Sh. Saurabh, Ld. proxy counsel for defendant.
Due to the absence of the defendant and his main
counsel, no settlement talks could take place.
In view of the above, put up on date fixed on
20.12.2025.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/03.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 869/2025
Ajay Gupta Vs. Santosh Kumar
24.11.2025
File taken up Suo-Moto.
Present: None.
Perusal of the record shows that there are chances of
settlement between the parties in the present matter and this is a
fit case for taken up in upcoming National Lok Adalat scheduled
to be held on 13.12.2025.
In view of the above, issue court notice (without PF)
to both the parties and their counsels for Pre-Sitting Lok Adalat
on 03.12.2025 at 4:00 PM.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/24.11.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
27.08.2025
Advocates are stated to be abstaining from work today.
Present: Ld. proxy counsel for plaintiff via VC.
Ld. proxy counsel for defendant via VC.
Ld. proxy counsel for the defendant submits that he has
received the copy of the plaint. However, page no.15, 16 and 24 are
not legible as per the Ld. proxy counsel for the defendant.
Plaintiff is directed to supply the aforesaid pages in soft
copy to the Ld. counsel for the defendant during the course of the day.
Defendant is directed to file WS within 30 days from
today alongwith advance copy to the opposite side.
Plaintiff is at liberty to file replication, if any to the WS
of the defendant alongwith advance copy to the opposite side. on or
before the NDOH
Put up on 15.10.2025.
(SUNIL KHATRI)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/27.08.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 869/25
AJAY GUPTA Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR
10.06.2025
Present: Ms. Shweta Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
An application U/O 6 Rule 17 CPC filed on behalf
of the Ld. counsel for the plaintiff. Same be taken on record.
Ld. counsel for the plaintiff submits that through the
aforesaid amendments, plaintiff wants to amend the para no. 10
and 13 of the plaint to clarify the role of AURA INFRA BIZ LLP
which is the consignee.
Heard.
In view of the opinion of the court, no injury or
prejudice would be caused to the defendant if the aforesaid
amendments, which are just technical in nature, are allowed in
the plaint. Therefore, the aforesaid application U/O 6 Rule 17
CPC is allowed and amendment plaint is taken on record.
Submissions on the plaint heard.
Issue summons to the defendant (s) upon filing of
PF/RC within 15 days returnable for NDOH.
Now to come up on 27.08.2025.
(Sunil Khatri)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/10.06.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS SCJ 869/2025
Ajay Gupta Vs. Santosh Kumar
14.05.2025
Fresh suit received by way of e-filing. It be checked
and registered.
Present: Ms. Shewta Garg, Ld. counsel for plaintiff.
Physical copy of plaint alongwith documents has been
filed. Same is taken on record. Ahlmad states that the same is in
order and complete.
In Para 10 of the plaint, following has been
mentioned:
“That the cause of action for this suit basically arose
during the year 2024 at Delhi during which period on the request/s
of the defendant through telephone, the plaintiff(s) delivered
“goods” from its place upon the defendant direction AURA INFRA
BIZ LLP to the defendant against the first (unpaid) bill of the
plaintiff.”
It cannot be ascertained as to what is the role of
AURA INFRA BIZ LLP. Ld. counsel for plaintiff states that AURA
INFRA BIZ LLP was the consignee. Admittedly, this fact has not
been mentioned in the plaint.
Ld. counsel for plaintiff seeks time to move
application for amendment of the plaint. Considered.
Let appropriate application be moved on or before the
NDOH.
Now to come up on 10.06.2025.
(KAPIL GUPTA)
Civil Judge-06 (Central)
Tis Hazari Courts
Delhi/14.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --