Uma GuptaVsPUNJAB GENERAL STORE

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 53 RC ARC/298/2023
DLCT030025092023
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
14.09.2026
File taken up in view of notification no.86/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC, Dated
08.09.2026 as 12.09.2026 was declared holiday.
Present: None for the petitioner
Sh. Amit Tyagi, Ld. proxy counsel for the respondent.
Today, the matter was fixed for PE.
For want of petitioner, matter is adjourned.
Put up for purpose fixed on 15.10.2026.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
14.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 53 RC ARC/298/2023
DLCT030025092023
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
14.09.2026
File taken up in view of notification no.86/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC, Dated
08.09.2026 as 12.09.2026 was declared holiday.
Present: None for the petitioner
Sh. Amit Tyagi, Ld. proxy counsel for the respondent.
Today, the matter was fixed for PE.
For want of petitioner, matter is adjourned.
Put up for purpose fixed on 15.10.2026.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
14.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 RC ARC/298/2023
DLCT030025092023
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
31.08.2026
Present: Sh. Kunal Prakash, Ld. counsel for the petitioner alongwith PW-1.
Sh.MK Tyagi, Ld. counsel for the respondent alongwith respondent.
Today, the matter was fixed for PE.
PW-1 is partly examined in chief and discharged.
Her further examination in chief is deferred for want of documents.
Put up for remaining examination of PW-1 on 12.09.2026.
Date is being given at the convenience of both the parties.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
31.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 RC ARC/298/2023
DLCT030025092023
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
19.08.2026
Present: Sh.Kunal Prakash, Ld. counsel for the petitioner
Ms. Kajol Sahu, Ld. proxy counsel for the respondent through VC.
Today, the matter was fixed for PE.
Ld. proxy counsel for respondent has sought adjournment as the main
counsel is not available due to medical exigency.
At request, matter is adjourned.
Put up for PE on 31.08.2026.
Date is being given at the convenience of both the parties.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
19.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 RC ARC/298/2023
DLCT030025092023
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
05.08.2026
Present: Sh. Kunal Prakash, Ld. counsel for the petitioner alongwith petitioner.
Respondent in person.
Today, the matter was fixed for PE.
Ld. counsel for the petitioner has sought permission of the court to
withdraw previous evidence by way of affidavit filed on behalf of petitioner. He has
further submitted that fresh evidence by way of affidavit of PW-1 was e-filed before the
court on 29.07.2026.
Hard copy filed before the court. Copy supplied.
Respondent has requested for passover as his counsel is busy in another
court.
Passover is not possible.
Accordingly, matter is adjourned.
Put up for PE on 19.08.2026.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
05.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
15.07.2026
Present: Sh. Kunal Prakash, Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. M. K. Tyagi, Ld. counsel for the respondent.
Today, the matter was fixed for PE.
Fresh evidence by way of affidavit of petitioner filed. Taken on record.
Copy already supplied.
Ld. counsel for the petitioner has sought adjournment to tender the
documents before the court since originals of some documents are not available with the
party.
At request, matter is adjourned.
Put up for PE on 05.08.2026.
Date is being given at the convenience of both the parties.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
15.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
06.05.2026
Present: Sh. Kunal Prakash, Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. M.K. Tyagi, Ld. counsel for the respondent
Today, the matter was fixed for filing of replication and depositing of cost
imposed upon the petitioner.
Ld. counsel for the petitioner has submitted that cost has been deposited by
the petitioner with the DLSA. Receipt filed.
Replication filed. Taken on record. Copy supplied.
Ld. counsel for the respondent has requested that direction be issued to the
petitioner to supply legible copy of replication as some of the documents are illegible.
Petitioner is directed to supply soft legible copy of replication to Ld.
counsel for respondent during the course of the day.
Put up for PE on 15.07.2026
Petitioner is directed to file his evidence by way of affidavit alongwith the
list of witnesses 07 days prior to the NDOH against advance copy to the opposite party.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
06.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
24.03.2026
Present: Ms. Muskaan Dewan, Ld. proxy counsel for the petitioner through VC.
Sh.M.K. Tyagi, Ld. counsel for the respondent alongwith respondent.
Today, the matter was fixed for filing of replication and evidence by way of
affidavit by the petitioner.
Both replication and evidence by way of affidavit not filed by the petitioner.
Perusal of the file reveals that vide order dated 13.06.2025, application for
leave to defend was allowed by Ld. Predecessor of this court and matter was fixed for
PE.
Till date, no evidence by way of affidavit has been filed on behalf of
petitioner.
Ld. proxy counsel for petitioner has submitted that compliance could not be
made by the petitioner as she had met with an accident.
Considering the conduct of the petitioner, cost of Rs.5,000/- is being
imposed upon the petitioner to be deposited with the DLSA, Central, THC, Delhi on the
NDOH for wasting the time of this court.
Put up for compliance / purpose fixed on 06.05.2026.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
24.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
24.03.2026
Present: Ms. Muskaan Dewan, Ld. proxy counsel for the petitioner through VC.
Sh.M.K. Tyagi, Ld. counsel for the respondent alongwith respondent.
Today, the matter was fixed for filing of replication and evidence by way of
affidavit by the petitioner.
Both replication and evidence by way of affidavit not filed by the petitioner.
Perusal of the file reveals that vide order dated 13.06.2025, application for
leave to defend was allowed by Ld. Predecessor of this court and matter was fixed for
PE.
Till date, no evidence by way of affidavit has been filed on behalf of
petitioner.
Ld. proxy counsel for petitioner has submitted that compliance could not be
made by the petitioner as she had met with an accident.
Considering the conduct of the petitioner, cost of Rs.5,000/- is being
imposed upon the petitioner to be deposited with the DLSA, Central, THC, Delhi on the
NDOH for wasting the time of this court.
Put up for compliance / purpose fixed on 06.05.2026.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
24.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
11.12.2025
Present: Sh. Kunal Prakash, Ld. counsel for petitioner alongwith petitioner.
Sh. Mukesh Tyagi, Ld. counsel for the respondent through VC.
Today, the matter was fixed for PE.
Vide order dated 13.06.2025, directions were issued to the respondent to file
written statement within 30 days and direction was also issued to supply advance copy
to the opposite party.
Perusal of the file reveals that written statement on behalf of the respondent
was e-filed before the court on 12.09.2025 and hard copy was also filed on 12.09.2025.
Ld. counsel for the petitioner has submitted that advance copy of written
statement was yet to be supplied to the petitioner.
Accordingly, matter is adjourned.
Let court notice be issued to respondent for NDOH.
Put up for further proceedings on 30.01.2026.
Let copy of this order be sent alongwith the notice.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
11.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 RC ARC 298/23 UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
18.09.2025
Ld. PO is on leave today.
Present: Sh. Satyam, Proxy counsel for petitioner.
Sh. M. K. Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
As per directions of Ld. PO. Matter stands adjourned for purpose already
fixed 11.12.2025.
(Ahlmad)
18.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 24 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
13.06.2025
Present: Sh. B. Khan, Counsel for petitioner (through VC)
None for the respondent.
Vide separate order of even date, leave to defend
application of the respondent is hereby allowed.
However, it is
clarified that nothing stated herein shall tantamount to final
opinion or expression on the merits of the case and findings have
been given only for determining if there exists any triable issue or
not.
Let written statement be filed within 30 days from
today with advance copy to the opposite party. Thereafter,
replication, if any, be also filed with advance copy to the opposite
party.
To come up for PE on 18.09.2025
Advance copy of evidence by way of affidavit be
supplied to the opposite side at least 15 days prior to the NDOH.
(Rupinder Singh Dhiman)
ARC-01, Central District,THC
13.06.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
01.05.2025
Present: Sh. B. Khan and Sh. Ankur Gupta, Counsels for
petitioner.
Sh. N. K. Tyagi, counsel for the respondent.
Written submissions filed on behalf of the petitioner.
Copy supplied.
Arguments heard on leave to defend application on
behalf of the parties.
List for order on leave to defend application on
13.06.2025 at 4.00 pm.
(Rupinder Singh Dhiman)
ARC-01, Central District,THC
01.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
03.03.2025
Present: Sh. B. Khan and Sh. Ankur Gupta, counsel for
petitioner.
Respondent Rajesh in person.
Respondent submits that his counsel is not available
today due to personal difficulty.
Counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the
personal difficulty, he is not opposing the request for adjourment
for today. However, repeatedly adjourments have been sought on
behalf of the respondent and therefore, a short date may be given.
In view of the personal difficulty of counsel for the
respondent, no adverse order is passed for today.
Accordingly, matter stands adjourned for arguments
on leave to defend application on 01.05.2025 at 12.00 Noon.
It is, however, clarified that no further adjournment
shall be given on the NDOH.
Both the parties are at liberty to file written
submissions/judgments, if any, with an index which also sets out
the relevant paragraph numbers and proposition of law that it sets
forth within four weeks from today.
(Rupinder Singh Dhiman)
ARC-01, Central District,THC
03.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
11.12.2024
Ld. PO is on first half day leave today.
Present: Sh. Ankur Gupta, Counsel for the petitioner alongwith
petitioner.
Sh. Amit Tyagi, Proxy Counsel for the respondent
(through VC).
As per direction of Ld. P. O., the matter is listed for
purpose already fixed on 03.03.2025.
(Reader)
11.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 22 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
03.12.2024
Present: Mr. B. Khan and Mr. Ankur Gupta, Counsels for the
petitioner with petitioner.
Mr. M.K Tyagi, Counsel for the respondent.
As per Ahlmad report, physical copy of the
application u/s 151 CPC was filed on behalf of respondent on
18.09.2024.
Perusal of record shows that the said application
already stands disposed off.
Perusal of record shows that respondent was directed
to file rejoinder within 02 weeks.
However, as per Ahlmad report, no rejoinder has been
filed till date.
Counsel for respondent submits that the rejoinder is
ready, however, due to being unwell the respondent could not sign
the same. He submits that he is supplying the copy to the opposite
counsel and shall file the rejoinder before the court within 07 days
from today.
Request allowed. Copy supplied.
Accordingly, list for arguments on leave to defendant
on 11.12.2024.
Both the parties are at liberty to file written synopsis,
if any, not exceeding 05 pages.
(Rupinder Singh Dhiman)
ARC-01, Central District,THC
03.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
16.07.2024
Lawyers are on strike today.
Present: Petitioner in person.
Sh. B. Khan, Ld. Counsel for petitioner appeared through
VC.
Respondent in person.
Sh. Mukesh Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for the respondent
appeared through VC.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner has stated that legible copies of the
documents have already been supplied to the respondent.
The respondent has stated that he has received certain
documents, however, not all the documents that were sought to be supplied
by the petitioner, have been received.
At this stage, ld. Counsel for the respondent has stated that
page nos.34 till 44, 106-109, 123-127, 129-134 have not been provided.
Petitioner is directed to supply the same within two weeks against
acknowledgment.
Let rejoinder, if any, be filed by the next date of hearing with
advance copy to the opposite party.
Be put up for arguments on leave to defend application on
18.09.2024.
(Tista Shah)
ARC-01, Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
16.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 23 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
09.04.2024
Present : Sh. Ankur Gupta and Sh. B. Khan, Ld. Counsels for
petitioner alongwith petitioner.
Sh. Mukesh Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for the respondent
appeared through VC.
It is submitted by ld. counsel for the respondent that
the legible copies of documents as mentioned in the last order
have not been supplied till date. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner
has stated that the same shall be supplied to the ld. counsel for
the respondent within one week against acknowledgment.
Be put up for filing of rejoinder, if any, and for
arguments on leave to defend application on 16.07.2024.
(Tista Shah)
ARC-01, Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
09.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
15.12.2023
Present : Sh. B. Khan, Ld. Counsel for petitioner alongwith
petitioner.
Sh. M. K. Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Reply to leave to defend application filed. Copy
given.
It is submitted by ld. counsel for respondent that
legible copy of the documents filed alongwith the petition has not
been provided till date.
Let the details of the documents/page number of the
documents which are not legible, be provided by ld. counsel for
respondent to ld. counsel for petitioner.
Subject to the same, let legible copy of the
documents be provided by ld. counsel for petitioner to ld. counsel
for respondent by the next date of hearing.
Let rejoinder, if any, be filed by the next date of
hearing with advance copy to the opposite party.
Be put up for arguments on leave to defend
application on 09.04.2024.
(PRAGATI)
ARC-01, Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
15.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
17.08.2023
Present : Ms. Taniya Tejan, Ld. Counsel for petitioner
alongwith petitioner.
Sh. M. K. Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for respondent
alongwith respondent.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of the respondent.
Same is taken on record.
Leave to defend application has been filed. Copy
given.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for respondent that he
has not received the legible copy of the document annexed with
the petition. Let the same be provided to Ld. Counsel for
respondent against proper receipt.
Let reply be filed by the next date of hearing with
advance copy to the opposite party.
Let rejoinder, if any, be filed by the next date of
hearing with advance copy to the opposite party.
Be put up for arguments on leave to defend
application on 15.12.2023.
(PRAGATI)
ARC-01, Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
17.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 RC ARC/298/2023
DLCT030025092023
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
15.10.2026
Present: Sh. Kunal Prakash, Ld. counsel for the petitioner alongwith PW-1.
Sh. M. K. Tyagi, Ld. counsel for the respondent.
Today, the matter was fixed for PE.
PW-1 is examined and discharged. Her cross examination is deferred at the
request of Ld. counsel for the respondent.
Put up for cross examination of PW-1 on 21.11.2026.
Date is being given at the convenience of both the parties.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
15.10.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 53 RC ARC/298/2023
DLCT030025092023
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
14.09.2026
File taken up in view of notification no.86/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC, Dated
08.09.2026 as 12.09.2026 was declared holiday.
Present: None for the petitioner
Sh. Amit Tyagi, Ld. proxy counsel for the respondent.
Today, the matter was fixed for PE.
For want of petitioner, matter is adjourned.
Put up for purpose fixed on 15.10.2026.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
14.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 53 RC ARC/298/2023
DLCT030025092023
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
14.09.2026
File taken up in view of notification no.86/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC, Dated
08.09.2026 as 12.09.2026 was declared holiday.
Present: None for the petitioner
Sh. Amit Tyagi, Ld. proxy counsel for the respondent.
Today, the matter was fixed for PE.
For want of petitioner, matter is adjourned.
Put up for purpose fixed on 15.10.2026.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
14.09.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12 RC ARC/298/2023
DLCT030025092023
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
31.08.2026
Present: Sh. Kunal Prakash, Ld. counsel for the petitioner alongwith PW-1.
Sh.MK Tyagi, Ld. counsel for the respondent alongwith respondent.
Today, the matter was fixed for PE.
PW-1 is partly examined in chief and discharged.
Her further examination in chief is deferred for want of documents.
Put up for remaining examination of PW-1 on 12.09.2026.
Date is being given at the convenience of both the parties.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
31.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 RC ARC/298/2023
DLCT030025092023
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
19.08.2026
Present: Sh.Kunal Prakash, Ld. counsel for the petitioner
Ms. Kajol Sahu, Ld. proxy counsel for the respondent through VC.
Today, the matter was fixed for PE.
Ld. proxy counsel for respondent has sought adjournment as the main
counsel is not available due to medical exigency.
At request, matter is adjourned.
Put up for PE on 31.08.2026.
Date is being given at the convenience of both the parties.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
19.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 RC ARC/298/2023
DLCT030025092023
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
05.08.2026
Present: Sh. Kunal Prakash, Ld. counsel for the petitioner alongwith petitioner.
Respondent in person.
Today, the matter was fixed for PE.
Ld. counsel for the petitioner has sought permission of the court to
withdraw previous evidence by way of affidavit filed on behalf of petitioner. He has
further submitted that fresh evidence by way of affidavit of PW-1 was e-filed before the
court on 29.07.2026.
Hard copy filed before the court. Copy supplied.
Respondent has requested for passover as his counsel is busy in another
court.
Passover is not possible.
Accordingly, matter is adjourned.
Put up for PE on 19.08.2026.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
05.08.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 11 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
15.07.2026
Present: Sh. Kunal Prakash, Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. M. K. Tyagi, Ld. counsel for the respondent.
Today, the matter was fixed for PE.
Fresh evidence by way of affidavit of petitioner filed. Taken on record.
Copy already supplied.
Ld. counsel for the petitioner has sought adjournment to tender the
documents before the court since originals of some documents are not available with the
party.
At request, matter is adjourned.
Put up for PE on 05.08.2026.
Date is being given at the convenience of both the parties.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
15.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 13 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
06.05.2026
Present: Sh. Kunal Prakash, Ld. counsel for the petitioner.
Sh. M.K. Tyagi, Ld. counsel for the respondent
Today, the matter was fixed for filing of replication and depositing of cost
imposed upon the petitioner.
Ld. counsel for the petitioner has submitted that cost has been deposited by
the petitioner with the DLSA. Receipt filed.
Replication filed. Taken on record. Copy supplied.
Ld. counsel for the respondent has requested that direction be issued to the
petitioner to supply legible copy of replication as some of the documents are illegible.
Petitioner is directed to supply soft legible copy of replication to Ld.
counsel for respondent during the course of the day.
Put up for PE on 15.07.2026
Petitioner is directed to file his evidence by way of affidavit alongwith the
list of witnesses 07 days prior to the NDOH against advance copy to the opposite party.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
06.05.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
24.03.2026
Present: Ms. Muskaan Dewan, Ld. proxy counsel for the petitioner through VC.
Sh.M.K. Tyagi, Ld. counsel for the respondent alongwith respondent.
Today, the matter was fixed for filing of replication and evidence by way of
affidavit by the petitioner.
Both replication and evidence by way of affidavit not filed by the petitioner.
Perusal of the file reveals that vide order dated 13.06.2025, application for
leave to defend was allowed by Ld. Predecessor of this court and matter was fixed for
PE.
Till date, no evidence by way of affidavit has been filed on behalf of
petitioner.
Ld. proxy counsel for petitioner has submitted that compliance could not be
made by the petitioner as she had met with an accident.
Considering the conduct of the petitioner, cost of Rs.5,000/- is being
imposed upon the petitioner to be deposited with the DLSA, Central, THC, Delhi on the
NDOH for wasting the time of this court.
Put up for compliance / purpose fixed on 06.05.2026.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
24.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
24.03.2026
Present: Ms. Muskaan Dewan, Ld. proxy counsel for the petitioner through VC.
Sh.M.K. Tyagi, Ld. counsel for the respondent alongwith respondent.
Today, the matter was fixed for filing of replication and evidence by way of
affidavit by the petitioner.
Both replication and evidence by way of affidavit not filed by the petitioner.
Perusal of the file reveals that vide order dated 13.06.2025, application for
leave to defend was allowed by Ld. Predecessor of this court and matter was fixed for
PE.
Till date, no evidence by way of affidavit has been filed on behalf of
petitioner.
Ld. proxy counsel for petitioner has submitted that compliance could not be
made by the petitioner as she had met with an accident.
Considering the conduct of the petitioner, cost of Rs.5,000/- is being
imposed upon the petitioner to be deposited with the DLSA, Central, THC, Delhi on the
NDOH for wasting the time of this court.
Put up for compliance / purpose fixed on 06.05.2026.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
24.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 9 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
11.12.2025
Present: Sh. Kunal Prakash, Ld. counsel for petitioner alongwith petitioner.
Sh. Mukesh Tyagi, Ld. counsel for the respondent through VC.
Today, the matter was fixed for PE.
Vide order dated 13.06.2025, directions were issued to the respondent to file
written statement within 30 days and direction was also issued to supply advance copy
to the opposite party.
Perusal of the file reveals that written statement on behalf of the respondent
was e-filed before the court on 12.09.2025 and hard copy was also filed on 12.09.2025.
Ld. counsel for the petitioner has submitted that advance copy of written
statement was yet to be supplied to the petitioner.
Accordingly, matter is adjourned.
Let court notice be issued to respondent for NDOH.
Put up for further proceedings on 30.01.2026.
Let copy of this order be sent alongwith the notice.
(Gaurav Goyal)
ARC-1, Central, THC
11.12.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 7 RC ARC 298/23 UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
18.09.2025
Ld. PO is on leave today.
Present: Sh. Satyam, Proxy counsel for petitioner.
Sh. M. K. Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
As per directions of Ld. PO. Matter stands adjourned for purpose already
fixed 11.12.2025.
(Ahlmad)
18.09.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 24 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
13.06.2025
Present: Sh. B. Khan, Counsel for petitioner (through VC)
None for the respondent.
Vide separate order of even date, leave to defend
application of the respondent is hereby allowed.
However, it is
clarified that nothing stated herein shall tantamount to final
opinion or expression on the merits of the case and findings have
been given only for determining if there exists any triable issue or
not.
Let written statement be filed within 30 days from
today with advance copy to the opposite party. Thereafter,
replication, if any, be also filed with advance copy to the opposite
party.
To come up for PE on 18.09.2025
Advance copy of evidence by way of affidavit be
supplied to the opposite side at least 15 days prior to the NDOH.
(Rupinder Singh Dhiman)
ARC-01, Central District,THC
13.06.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 16 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
01.05.2025
Present: Sh. B. Khan and Sh. Ankur Gupta, Counsels for
petitioner.
Sh. N. K. Tyagi, counsel for the respondent.
Written submissions filed on behalf of the petitioner.
Copy supplied.
Arguments heard on leave to defend application on
behalf of the parties.
List for order on leave to defend application on
13.06.2025 at 4.00 pm.
(Rupinder Singh Dhiman)
ARC-01, Central District,THC
01.05.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
03.03.2025
Present: Sh. B. Khan and Sh. Ankur Gupta, counsel for
petitioner.
Respondent Rajesh in person.
Respondent submits that his counsel is not available
today due to personal difficulty.
Counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the
personal difficulty, he is not opposing the request for adjourment
for today. However, repeatedly adjourments have been sought on
behalf of the respondent and therefore, a short date may be given.
In view of the personal difficulty of counsel for the
respondent, no adverse order is passed for today.
Accordingly, matter stands adjourned for arguments
on leave to defend application on 01.05.2025 at 12.00 Noon.
It is, however, clarified that no further adjournment
shall be given on the NDOH.
Both the parties are at liberty to file written
submissions/judgments, if any, with an index which also sets out
the relevant paragraph numbers and proposition of law that it sets
forth within four weeks from today.
(Rupinder Singh Dhiman)
ARC-01, Central District,THC
03.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 20RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
11.12.2024
Ld. PO is on first half day leave today.
Present: Sh. Ankur Gupta, Counsel for the petitioner alongwith
petitioner.
Sh. Amit Tyagi, Proxy Counsel for the respondent
(through VC).
As per direction of Ld. P. O., the matter is listed for
purpose already fixed on 03.03.2025.
(Reader)
11.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: 22 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
03.12.2024
Present: Mr. B. Khan and Mr. Ankur Gupta, Counsels for the
petitioner with petitioner.
Mr. M.K Tyagi, Counsel for the respondent.
As per Ahlmad report, physical copy of the
application u/s 151 CPC was filed on behalf of respondent on
18.09.2024.
Perusal of record shows that the said application
already stands disposed off.
Perusal of record shows that respondent was directed
to file rejoinder within 02 weeks.
However, as per Ahlmad report, no rejoinder has been
filed till date.
Counsel for respondent submits that the rejoinder is
ready, however, due to being unwell the respondent could not sign
the same. He submits that he is supplying the copy to the opposite
counsel and shall file the rejoinder before the court within 07 days
from today.
Request allowed. Copy supplied.
Accordingly, list for arguments on leave to defendant
on 11.12.2024.
Both the parties are at liberty to file written synopsis,
if any, not exceeding 05 pages.
(Rupinder Singh Dhiman)
ARC-01, Central District,THC
03.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
16.07.2024
Lawyers are on strike today.
Present: Petitioner in person.
Sh. B. Khan, Ld. Counsel for petitioner appeared through
VC.
Respondent in person.
Sh. Mukesh Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for the respondent
appeared through VC.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner has stated that legible copies of the
documents have already been supplied to the respondent.
The respondent has stated that he has received certain
documents, however, not all the documents that were sought to be supplied
by the petitioner, have been received.
At this stage, ld. Counsel for the respondent has stated that
page nos.34 till 44, 106-109, 123-127, 129-134 have not been provided.
Petitioner is directed to supply the same within two weeks against
acknowledgment.
Let rejoinder, if any, be filed by the next date of hearing with
advance copy to the opposite party.
Be put up for arguments on leave to defend application on
18.09.2024.
(Tista Shah)
ARC-01, Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
16.07.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 23 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
09.04.2024
Present : Sh. Ankur Gupta and Sh. B. Khan, Ld. Counsels for
petitioner alongwith petitioner.
Sh. Mukesh Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for the respondent
appeared through VC.
It is submitted by ld. counsel for the respondent that
the legible copies of documents as mentioned in the last order
have not been supplied till date. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner
has stated that the same shall be supplied to the ld. counsel for
the respondent within one week against acknowledgment.
Be put up for filing of rejoinder, if any, and for
arguments on leave to defend application on 16.07.2024.
(Tista Shah)
ARC-01, Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
09.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 22 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
15.12.2023
Present : Sh. B. Khan, Ld. Counsel for petitioner alongwith
petitioner.
Sh. M. K. Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Reply to leave to defend application filed. Copy
given.
It is submitted by ld. counsel for respondent that
legible copy of the documents filed alongwith the petition has not
been provided till date.
Let the details of the documents/page number of the
documents which are not legible, be provided by ld. counsel for
respondent to ld. counsel for petitioner.
Subject to the same, let legible copy of the
documents be provided by ld. counsel for petitioner to ld. counsel
for respondent by the next date of hearing.
Let rejoinder, if any, be filed by the next date of
hearing with advance copy to the opposite party.
Be put up for arguments on leave to defend
application on 09.04.2024.
(PRAGATI)
ARC-01, Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
15.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 6 RC ARC 298/23
UMA GUPTA Vs. PUNJAB GENERAL STORE
17.08.2023
Present : Ms. Taniya Tejan, Ld. Counsel for petitioner
alongwith petitioner.
Sh. M. K. Tyagi, Ld. Counsel for respondent
alongwith respondent.
Fresh vakalatnama filed on behalf of the respondent.
Same is taken on record.
Leave to defend application has been filed. Copy
given.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for respondent that he
has not received the legible copy of the document annexed with
the petition. Let the same be provided to Ld. Counsel for
respondent against proper receipt.
Let reply be filed by the next date of hearing with
advance copy to the opposite party.
Let rejoinder, if any, be filed by the next date of
hearing with advance copy to the opposite party.
Be put up for arguments on leave to defend
application on 15.12.2023.
(PRAGATI)
ARC-01, Central District,
Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi
17.08.2023
-- 1 of 1 --