SOHAN LALVsVICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
02.07.2026
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioners.
Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Matter is listed for arguments on the application seeking leave to defend.
Previous cost of Rs.8,000/- has been paid by the Ld. Counsel for petitioner
to Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
At joint request, the present matter is hereby referred to the Delhi Mediation
Centre, THC, Delhi. Parties are directed to appear before Delhi Mediation Centre, THC,
Delhi on 08.07.2026 at 02.00 PM and before court on 16.09.2026.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
02.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 15
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
27.03.2026
Present : Ld. Proxy Counsel for petitioner.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for respondent.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that he has deposited the cost imposed
upon the petitioner vide order dated 09.01.2026. Let receipt thereof be filed during the
course of the day.
He further submits that petitioner is willing to pay the cost imposed vide
order dated 21.12.2024 and 08.07.2025 to the other side. However, neither the main
counsel for respondent nor AR of the respondent have appeared.
AR of respondent shall remain present in person on the NDOH.
As per report of the Ahlmad, reply has been filed on behalf of petitioner on
27.02.2026.
Request for adjournment is made on behalf of respondent as the main
counsel is in personal difficulty and request for passover is made on behalf of petitioner.
Considering the same, be adjourned for arguments and disposal of the
application by way of last and final opportunity to both the sides on 02.07.2026.
Both the counsels are expected to remain present in person on NDOH for
arguments.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
27.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
16.10.2025
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. (through VC)
Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner has sought an adjournment by submitting that his
nephew has just passed away ten days back. Record shows that petitioners have not
deposited the cost imposed vide order dated 21.12.2024 and 12.03.2025. Petitioners have
also not filed any reply to the application seeking leave to defend. Petitioners have also not
filed any medical documents in terms of the last order. Petitioners are absent today also
despite directions to remain present.
Petitioners shall remain present in person on the NDOH.
Let the order dated 08.07.2025 be complied with by the petitioners
within a week from today.
Be adjourned for 09.01.2026.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
16.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 17
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
08.07.2025
Regular Stenographer of the court is on leave today.
Present : Ld. Counsel for the petitioners through VC.
Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
Petitioners have not bothered to deposit / pay the cost imposed vide order
dated 21.12.2024 as well as 12.03.2025. Let it be deposited / paid during the course of the
day, failing which, further cost of Rs. 5000/- shall be imposed upon the petitioners to be
paid to the respondent.
Petitioners are absent despite specific directions. They are stated to be unwell.
Let the medical documents be filed in this regard on NDOH.
An application seeking leave to defend was filed on behalf of respondent on
22.03.2025. Copy has been supplied in advance to other side.
Let reply, if any, be filed within two weeks from today with advance copy to
the opposite side.
Let rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter with advance copy
to opposite side.
Now to come up for arguments on leave to defend application for 16.10.2025.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
08.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 23
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
13.11.2024
Regular stenographer of this court is on leave today.
Present : Ms. Yashaswi, Sh. Sh. SK Chocksey & Mr. Sushant, Ld. Counsel for
petitioner.
Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is still at the stage of leave to defend application.
Two applications, one application u/O 6 rule 17 CPC filed by the petitioner
and other u/O 7 rule 11 CPC filed by the respondent are pending adjudication.
Arguments heard on the application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC.
Put up for orders on the application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC on 21.12.2024 at 4 PM.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
13.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 26
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
13.08.2024
Present : Mr. Sushant Sagar, Ld. counsel for petitioner. (through VC)
Petitioner in person.
Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in administrative work.
Re-list for purpose fixed on 13.11.2024.
(Ahlmad)
13.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
20.04.2024
Present: Mr. Mukesh Kumar (through VC) and Mr. Kishan, Ld. Counsel for
petitioner.
Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
An application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC alongwith proposed amended
petition filed. Copy supplied to the opposite side. Taken on record.
Ld. Counsel for respondent submits that he has still not been supplied with
copy of the first amended petition. Petitioner is directed to supply the same to Ld.
Counsel for respondent within three days from today, failing which adverse order shall
follow.
Re-list for reply/arguments on the pending applications under Order 7 Rule
11 CPC and under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC on 13.08.2024.
(Medha Arya)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
20.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
20.12.2023
Present: Mr. Yashasvi, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that he has received the copy of
application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, and he needs some time to file a reply
thereto.
It is also submitted by the Ld. Counsel for petitioner that he may be
given a brief accommodation to move an application for amendment of the petition,
as the address of demised premises as mentioned in the petition is slightly incorrect.
In the interest of justice, put up for further proceedings on 20.04.2024.
(Medha Arya)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
20.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: E. No. 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
18.09.2023
Present: Mr. Sushant Sagar, Ld. Proxy counsel for petitioner.
Mr. Sanjiv Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
As per report of the Ahlmad, an application under Section 151 CPC filed
on behalf respondent. However, the petition number as mentioned in the said
application is incorrect.
It is stated by proxy counsel for petitioner that he would file the amended
petition during the course of the day and he would also place the copy of the same for
the other party which would be released to the other party, as per rules.
Let reply, if any, be filed within two weeks from today with advance
copy to the opposite side.
Let rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks from service thereafter
with advance copy to opposite side.
Put up on 20.12.2023.
(Vivek Beniwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
18.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
26.07.2023
Present: Mr. Yashasvi, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. (through VC)
Mr. Sanjiv Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
As per report of the Ahlmad, ordinary summons sent to respondent on
both the addresses received back unserved.
As per the report, application for leave to defend already filed on behalf
of respondent on 25.04.2023.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner states that originally the petitioner was filed
under Section 14 (1) (b) of DRC Act after which the petition was amended and only
the ground under Section 14 (1) (e) of DRC Act was included in the petition.
Ld. Counsel for respondent states that he has not revived the copy of the
amended petition. Ld. Counsel for petitioner is directed to supply the same within
two days.
Let reply to the application for leave to defend, if any, be filed within
two weeks from today with advance copy to the opposite side.
Let rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks from service thereafter
with advance copy to opposite side.
Now to come up on 18.09.2023.
(Vivek Beniwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
26.07.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
31.03.2023
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
An application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC has been filed on behalf of
the petitioner seeking to amend the petition stating that the same has been filed only
under Section 14 (1) (e) of DRC Act and not under Section 14 (1) (b) of DRC Act.
Heard. Perused.
Considering that the present petition is at the initial stage and no
prejudice would be caused to the opposite side, the application is allowed. The
amended petition is taken on record.
On filing of PF and RC, issue summons under Third Schedule of Delhi
Rent Control Act for service upon the respondent.
Put up on 26.07.2023.
(Mridul Gupta)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
31.03.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 12
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
02.07.2026
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioners.
Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Matter is listed for arguments on the application seeking leave to defend.
Previous cost of Rs.8,000/- has been paid by the Ld. Counsel for petitioner
to Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
At joint request, the present matter is hereby referred to the Delhi Mediation
Centre, THC, Delhi. Parties are directed to appear before Delhi Mediation Centre, THC,
Delhi on 08.07.2026 at 02.00 PM and before court on 16.09.2026.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
02.07.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 15
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
27.03.2026
Present : Ld. Proxy Counsel for petitioner.
Ld. Proxy Counsel for respondent.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that he has deposited the cost imposed
upon the petitioner vide order dated 09.01.2026. Let receipt thereof be filed during the
course of the day.
He further submits that petitioner is willing to pay the cost imposed vide
order dated 21.12.2024 and 08.07.2025 to the other side. However, neither the main
counsel for respondent nor AR of the respondent have appeared.
AR of respondent shall remain present in person on the NDOH.
As per report of the Ahlmad, reply has been filed on behalf of petitioner on
27.02.2026.
Request for adjournment is made on behalf of respondent as the main
counsel is in personal difficulty and request for passover is made on behalf of petitioner.
Considering the same, be adjourned for arguments and disposal of the
application by way of last and final opportunity to both the sides on 02.07.2026.
Both the counsels are expected to remain present in person on NDOH for
arguments.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
27.03.2026
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 19
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
16.10.2025
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner. (through VC)
Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner has sought an adjournment by submitting that his
nephew has just passed away ten days back. Record shows that petitioners have not
deposited the cost imposed vide order dated 21.12.2024 and 12.03.2025. Petitioners have
also not filed any reply to the application seeking leave to defend. Petitioners have also not
filed any medical documents in terms of the last order. Petitioners are absent today also
despite directions to remain present.
Petitioners shall remain present in person on the NDOH.
Let the order dated 08.07.2025 be complied with by the petitioners
within a week from today.
Be adjourned for 09.01.2026.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
16.10.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 17
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
08.07.2025
Regular Stenographer of the court is on leave today.
Present : Ld. Counsel for the petitioners through VC.
Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
Petitioners have not bothered to deposit / pay the cost imposed vide order
dated 21.12.2024 as well as 12.03.2025. Let it be deposited / paid during the course of the
day, failing which, further cost of Rs. 5000/- shall be imposed upon the petitioners to be
paid to the respondent.
Petitioners are absent despite specific directions. They are stated to be unwell.
Let the medical documents be filed in this regard on NDOH.
An application seeking leave to defend was filed on behalf of respondent on
22.03.2025. Copy has been supplied in advance to other side.
Let reply, if any, be filed within two weeks from today with advance copy to
the opposite side.
Let rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter with advance copy
to opposite side.
Now to come up for arguments on leave to defend application for 16.10.2025.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
08.07.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 23
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
13.11.2024
Regular stenographer of this court is on leave today.
Present : Ms. Yashaswi, Sh. Sh. SK Chocksey & Mr. Sushant, Ld. Counsel for
petitioner.
Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Ld. Counsel for defendant.
Matter is still at the stage of leave to defend application.
Two applications, one application u/O 6 rule 17 CPC filed by the petitioner
and other u/O 7 rule 11 CPC filed by the respondent are pending adjudication.
Arguments heard on the application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC.
Put up for orders on the application u/o 7 rule 11 CPC on 21.12.2024 at 4 PM.
(Bharat Aggarwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
13.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 26
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
13.08.2024
Present : Mr. Sushant Sagar, Ld. counsel for petitioner. (through VC)
Petitioner in person.
Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Ld. Presiding Officer is busy in administrative work.
Re-list for purpose fixed on 13.11.2024.
(Ahlmad)
13.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 8
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
20.04.2024
Present: Mr. Mukesh Kumar (through VC) and Mr. Kishan, Ld. Counsel for
petitioner.
Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
An application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC alongwith proposed amended
petition filed. Copy supplied to the opposite side. Taken on record.
Ld. Counsel for respondent submits that he has still not been supplied with
copy of the first amended petition. Petitioner is directed to supply the same to Ld.
Counsel for respondent within three days from today, failing which adverse order shall
follow.
Re-list for reply/arguments on the pending applications under Order 7 Rule
11 CPC and under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC on 13.08.2024.
(Medha Arya)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
20.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 10
RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
20.12.2023
Present: Mr. Yashasvi, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that he has received the copy of
application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, and he needs some time to file a reply
thereto.
It is also submitted by the Ld. Counsel for petitioner that he may be
given a brief accommodation to move an application for amendment of the petition,
as the address of demised premises as mentioned in the petition is slightly incorrect.
In the interest of justice, put up for further proceedings on 20.04.2024.
(Medha Arya)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
20.12.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: E. No. 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
18.09.2023
Present: Mr. Sushant Sagar, Ld. Proxy counsel for petitioner.
Mr. Sanjiv Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
As per report of the Ahlmad, an application under Section 151 CPC filed
on behalf respondent. However, the petition number as mentioned in the said
application is incorrect.
It is stated by proxy counsel for petitioner that he would file the amended
petition during the course of the day and he would also place the copy of the same for
the other party which would be released to the other party, as per rules.
Let reply, if any, be filed within two weeks from today with advance
copy to the opposite side.
Let rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks from service thereafter
with advance copy to opposite side.
Put up on 20.12.2023.
(Vivek Beniwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
18.09.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
26.07.2023
Present: Mr. Yashasvi, Ld. Counsel for petitioner. (through VC)
Mr. Sanjiv Sharma, Ld. Counsel for respondent.
As per report of the Ahlmad, ordinary summons sent to respondent on
both the addresses received back unserved.
As per the report, application for leave to defend already filed on behalf
of respondent on 25.04.2023.
Ld. Counsel for petitioner states that originally the petitioner was filed
under Section 14 (1) (b) of DRC Act after which the petition was amended and only
the ground under Section 14 (1) (e) of DRC Act was included in the petition.
Ld. Counsel for respondent states that he has not revived the copy of the
amended petition. Ld. Counsel for petitioner is directed to supply the same within
two days.
Let reply to the application for leave to defend, if any, be filed within
two weeks from today with advance copy to the opposite side.
Let rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks from service thereafter
with advance copy to opposite side.
Now to come up on 18.09.2023.
(Vivek Beniwal)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
26.07.2023
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: RC ARC 167/23
SOHAN LAL Vs. VICCO AGENCIES PVT LTD
31.03.2023
Present : Ld. Counsel for petitioner.
An application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC has been filed on behalf of
the petitioner seeking to amend the petition stating that the same has been filed only
under Section 14 (1) (e) of DRC Act and not under Section 14 (1) (b) of DRC Act.
Heard. Perused.
Considering that the present petition is at the initial stage and no
prejudice would be caused to the opposite side, the application is allowed. The
amended petition is taken on record.
On filing of PF and RC, issue summons under Third Schedule of Delhi
Rent Control Act for service upon the respondent.
Put up on 26.07.2023.
(Mridul Gupta)
ACJ-cum-ARC, Central
District, Tis Hazari Courts
31.03.2023
-- 1 of 1 --