Full Order Text
Interim Order 18 · 04 Jun 2026 · CNR DLCT010065652024
Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS Pdf Text: 5 CS (COMM) 540/24 M/S GREATEX SYNTHETICS PVT. LTD. Vs. M/S DAMY ROYAL STYLE PVT. LTD. 04.06.2026 Present: Sh. Subhash Chandra, Counsel for Plaintiff. Sh. Deepanshu Joshi, Counsel for Defendant. Defendant witness Sh. Damneesh Yadav is present. Counsel for the defendant submits that today matter is listed for the defendant evidence. During the course of putting exhibits on documents, counsel for the plaintiff has raised some objections regarding marking/exhibits in the absence of certificate under section 65 B of the Indian Evidence Act. It is submitted by counsel for the defendant that matter may be passover for one hour for filing the said affidavit. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that the evidence of plaintiff was closed on 15.09.2025 by Learned Predecessor and thereafter matter was listed for defendant’s evidence on 06.11.2025 but since then defendant has not been leading evidence on one pretext or other, moreover, if any affidavit under section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act was to be filed by the defendant then it should have been filed earlier but not now. Heard. Record perused. Submissions of counsel for the plaintiff appears to be correct. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, particularly, defendant was having sufficient time to file the said affidavit but he failed to do so. Therefore, now the Contd….2 -- 1 of 2 -- -2- request of counsel for the defendant for seeking passover for filing the said affidavit is declined. At this stage, DW-1 Sh. Damneesh Yadav tendered his evidence by way of affidavit, DW-1 is examined-in-chief, cross-examined and discharge. Counsel for the defendant submits that he has filed an application under Order XVI Rule 1 & 6 of CPC read with section 151 of CPC for summoning the witness and production of documents. Copy already supplied to the counsel for the plaintiff. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that defendant has not filed any list of witness within 15 days after framing of issues, therefore, now no new witness can be summoned at this stage. It is prayed that DE may be closed. At this stage, counsel for the defendant submits that he wants to file some citations in support of his arguments regarding summoning the additional witness without filing the list of witness within 15 days after framing of issues. Heard. Put up for filing citations/further proceedings on 15.07.2026. (R.L. Meena) District Judge (Commercial Court-06) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi 04.06.2026(v) -- 2 of 2 --
