SMT. SEEMA JAINVsSH. GURMEET SINGH

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Seema Jain VS. Gurmeet Singh
CS (Comm) No. 140/2024
01.04.2025
Present : Sh. Satyarth, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff through video
conferencing.
Defendant already ex-parte.
Vide separate detailed Judgment, the suit of the plaintiff is decreed
for an amount of Rs. 17,405/- along with interest @ 18% annum from the date
of filing of the suit till the date of decree and thereafter till its realization. Rest of
the claim of the plaintiff is declined. No order as to costs. Decree sheet be
prepared accordingly. File be consigned to the record room after necessary
compliance.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
DJ (Commercial)-01, Central,
THC/Delhi / 01.04.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
CS (Comm) No. 140/2024
28.03.2025
Present : None.
Case is fixed for Judgment, however same is not ready.
Put up for Judgment on 1.4.2025.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
DJ (Commercial)-01, Central,
THC/Delhi / 28.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
CS (Comm) No. 140/2024
27.03.2025
Present : None.
Case is fixed for Judgment however same is under dictation.
Put up for Judgment on 28.3.2025.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
DJ (Commercial)-01, Central,
THC/Delhi / 27.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
20.03.2025
Present:- Sh. Satyarth Trilok Chand, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant is
ex-parte.
Final arguments heard.
Put up for clarifications, if any / judgment on
27.03.2025.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/20.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
21.02.2025
Present:- None despite repeated calls since morning.
In the interest of justice, case is adjourned for ex-
parte final arguments to 04.03.2025.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/21.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
29.01.2025
Present:- Sh. Satyarth, Ld. Counsels for plaintiff.
None for defendant despite repeated calls.
Despite service, none has appeared on behalf of
defendant nor WS has been filed, therefore, defendant is
proceeded ex-parte.
Put up for ex-parte PE on 14.02.2025.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/29.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No.140-24
Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
04.01.2025
Present:- Sh. Satyarth Trilok Chand, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
[through VC].
None for defendant.
Summons sent to the defendant by way of affixation
received back with the report that premises found locked and on
inquiry it was told that defendant is the owner of the premises,
who seldomly visits the place and there is no fix time of his visit,
therefore, summons were affixed.
Summons through publication has been served to the
defendant as mentioned in order dated 29.11.2024. Therefore, I
am satisfied that defendant has been served both by way of
affixation as well as publication.
Since the defendant has been served by way of
affixation on 17.12.2024, therefore, 30 days time has yet not been
expired. Let written statement be filed within statutory period
with direction to supply advance copy to Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
who may thereafter file replication, if any.
Put up for case management hearing / framing of
issues on 29.01.2025.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/04.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 CS (COMM) 140/24
SMT. SEEMA JAIN Vs. SH. GURMEET SINGH
03.12.2024
Present:- Sh. Satyarth Trilok Chand, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
[through VC].
None for defendant.
Steps have not been taken by plaintiff to serve the
defendant by way of affixation at the last known address. Though
publication has already been done. Hence, the order dt.
22.10.2024 has not completely been complied with.
At request, fresh summons be issued to the
defendant by way of affixation at the last known address on filing
of PF. Steps be taken within 3 days.
Put up for report on 04.01.2025.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/03.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
29.11.2024
Present:- Sh. Satyarth Trilok Chand, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has filed newspaper
“Hindustan” dt. 26.11.2024 regarding service of defendant by
way of publication, however, report qua affixation which was
given
dasti not received.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff that he is
unable to contact main counsel, therefore, unable to inform
whether the dasti summons were served or not.
Let report in this regard be filed.
Put up for report on 03.12.2024.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/29.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
22.10.2024
Present:- Sh. Satyarth Trilok Chand, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
As per report of process server, summons sent to the
defendant received back unserved with the report that one lady
namely Chitra met and informed that ground floor is vacant since
many days and its owner is Ramesh.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that defendant was
contacted through phone and he promised to appear due to which
steps for publication could not be taken and he prays for fresh
summons.
Heard. Allowed.
Let defendant be served by way of affixation at the
last known address as well as publication in the newspaper
“
Hindustan” Hindi, having circulation in the vicinity of defendant
on filing PF and publication charges. Steps be taken within 3
days. Request of
dasti allowed.
Put up on 29.11.2024.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/22.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 140/24
SMT. SEEMA JAIN Vs. SH. GURMEET SINGH
27.08.2024
Present:- Sh. Satyarth Trilok Chand, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Summons sent to the defendant through ordinary
process received back with the report that premises found locked
and neighbor Narender informed that some persons occasionally
visit. Summons sent through speed post received back with
remarks “
no such firm”.
In these circumstances, let plaintiff to file fresh
address of the defendant or take step for service of defendant
through alternative modes.
Put up on 12.09.2024.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/27.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
27.04.2024
Present:- None.
Be awaited.
At 12.37 p.m
Present : As above.
Be awaited.
At 03.14 p.m.
Present : None for plaintiff despite repeated calls since
morning.
Steps not taken to serve the defendant as PF not
filed. It shows that plaintiff is not sincerely interested to pursue
the present suit. Hence, same is hereby dismissed for non-
prosecution.
File be consigned to record room.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/27.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Sudershan Enterprises Vs. Permax Engineers
CS (Comm) No. 140/2024
27.02.2024
Present : Sh. Naresh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some more time to file
application for amendment.
In these circumstances, case is adjourned for 1.3.2024.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
DJ (Commercial)01 , Central,
THC/Delhi / 27.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Sudershan Enterprises Vs. Permax Engineers
30.01.2024
Present:- Sh. Sahil Solanki, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Physical file has been filed by plaintiff’s counsel.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that he is not aware
what is the constitution of defendant whether it is proprietorship
firm, partnership or company and he will file an appropriate
application to amend the plaint.
Hence, case is adjourned to 27.02.2024.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/30.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Sudershan Enterprises Vs. Permax Engineers
23.01.2024
Fresh suit for recovery has been received via e-filing. It be
checked and registered.
Present:- None.
Plaintiff is directed to file physical file within two
days.
Put up on 30.01.2024.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/23.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
CS (Comm) No. 140/2024
28.03.2025
Present : None.
Case is fixed for Judgment, however same is not ready.
Put up for Judgment on 1.4.2025.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
DJ (Commercial)-01, Central,
THC/Delhi / 28.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
CS (Comm) No. 140/2024
27.03.2025
Present : None.
Case is fixed for Judgment however same is under dictation.
Put up for Judgment on 28.3.2025.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
DJ (Commercial)-01, Central,
THC/Delhi / 27.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
20.03.2025
Present:- Sh. Satyarth Trilok Chand, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Defendant is
ex-parte.
Final arguments heard.
Put up for clarifications, if any / judgment on
27.03.2025.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/20.03.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
21.02.2025
Present:- None despite repeated calls since morning.
In the interest of justice, case is adjourned for ex-
parte final arguments to 04.03.2025.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/21.02.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
29.01.2025
Present:- Sh. Satyarth, Ld. Counsels for plaintiff.
None for defendant despite repeated calls.
Despite service, none has appeared on behalf of
defendant nor WS has been filed, therefore, defendant is
proceeded ex-parte.
Put up for ex-parte PE on 14.02.2025.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/29.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No.140-24
Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
04.01.2025
Present:- Sh. Satyarth Trilok Chand, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
[through VC].
None for defendant.
Summons sent to the defendant by way of affixation
received back with the report that premises found locked and on
inquiry it was told that defendant is the owner of the premises,
who seldomly visits the place and there is no fix time of his visit,
therefore, summons were affixed.
Summons through publication has been served to the
defendant as mentioned in order dated 29.11.2024. Therefore, I
am satisfied that defendant has been served both by way of
affixation as well as publication.
Since the defendant has been served by way of
affixation on 17.12.2024, therefore, 30 days time has yet not been
expired. Let written statement be filed within statutory period
with direction to supply advance copy to Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
who may thereafter file replication, if any.
Put up for case management hearing / framing of
issues on 29.01.2025.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/04.01.2025
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: 5 CS (COMM) 140/24
SMT. SEEMA JAIN Vs. SH. GURMEET SINGH
03.12.2024
Present:- Sh. Satyarth Trilok Chand, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff
[through VC].
None for defendant.
Steps have not been taken by plaintiff to serve the
defendant by way of affixation at the last known address. Though
publication has already been done. Hence, the order dt.
22.10.2024 has not completely been complied with.
At request, fresh summons be issued to the
defendant by way of affixation at the last known address on filing
of PF. Steps be taken within 3 days.
Put up for report on 04.01.2025.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/03.12.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
29.11.2024
Present:- Sh. Satyarth Trilok Chand, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff has filed newspaper
“Hindustan” dt. 26.11.2024 regarding service of defendant by
way of publication, however, report qua affixation which was
given
dasti not received.
It is submitted by Ld. Counsel for plaintiff that he is
unable to contact main counsel, therefore, unable to inform
whether the dasti summons were served or not.
Let report in this regard be filed.
Put up for report on 03.12.2024.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/29.11.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
22.10.2024
Present:- Sh. Satyarth Trilok Chand, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
As per report of process server, summons sent to the
defendant received back unserved with the report that one lady
namely Chitra met and informed that ground floor is vacant since
many days and its owner is Ramesh.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that defendant was
contacted through phone and he promised to appear due to which
steps for publication could not be taken and he prays for fresh
summons.
Heard. Allowed.
Let defendant be served by way of affixation at the
last known address as well as publication in the newspaper
“
Hindustan” Hindi, having circulation in the vicinity of defendant
on filing PF and publication charges. Steps be taken within 3
days. Request of
dasti allowed.
Put up on 29.11.2024.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/22.10.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: CS (COMM) 140/24
SMT. SEEMA JAIN Vs. SH. GURMEET SINGH
27.08.2024
Present:- Sh. Satyarth Trilok Chand, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
None for defendant.
Summons sent to the defendant through ordinary
process received back with the report that premises found locked
and neighbor Narender informed that some persons occasionally
visit. Summons sent through speed post received back with
remarks “
no such firm”.
In these circumstances, let plaintiff to file fresh
address of the defendant or take step for service of defendant
through alternative modes.
Put up on 12.09.2024.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/27.08.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Seema Jain Vs. Gurmeet Singh
27.04.2024
Present:- None.
Be awaited.
At 12.37 p.m
Present : As above.
Be awaited.
At 03.14 p.m.
Present : None for plaintiff despite repeated calls since
morning.
Steps not taken to serve the defendant as PF not
filed. It shows that plaintiff is not sincerely interested to pursue
the present suit. Hence, same is hereby dismissed for non-
prosecution.
File be consigned to record room.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/27.04.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
Pdf Text: Sudershan Enterprises Vs. Permax Engineers
CS (Comm) No. 140/2024
27.02.2024
Present : Sh. Naresh, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.
Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff seeks some more time to file
application for amendment.
In these circumstances, case is adjourned for 1.3.2024.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
DJ (Commercial)01 , Central,
THC/Delhi / 27.02.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Sudershan Enterprises Vs. Permax Engineers
30.01.2024
Present:- Sh. Sahil Solanki, Ld. Counsel for plaintiff.
Physical file has been filed by plaintiff’s counsel.
Ld. Counsel for plaintiff submits that he is not aware
what is the constitution of defendant whether it is proprietorship
firm, partnership or company and he will file an appropriate
application to amend the plaint.
Hence, case is adjourned to 27.02.2024.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/30.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --

Order Details: COPY OF ORDER
Pdf Text: CS (Comm) No. 140-24
Sudershan Enterprises Vs. Permax Engineers
23.01.2024
Fresh suit for recovery has been received via e-filing. It be
checked and registered.
Present:- None.
Plaintiff is directed to file physical file within two
days.
Put up on 30.01.2024.
(Sanjeev Kumar Aggarwal)
District Judge (Commercial Court)-01,
Central, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi/23.01.2024
-- 1 of 1 --