Order 3

Order Details: Order on Exhibit
Pdf Text: 1
IN THE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AT MUMBAI
[BANDRA BRANCH]
(Appellate Bench)
(CNR NO.MHSCA30010982022 )
ORDER BELOW EXH 12
IN
MISC APPEAL NO. 19 OF 2023
IN
ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT13
IN
RAD SUIT NO. 215 OF 2021
M/s. Dolphin Build Home ...Appellant/
(Original defendants )
V/s.
Malcolm Charles Lourenco Pereira …Respondent/
(Original Plaintiff)
C. R. Yadav : Advocate for the Appellant.
Harsh T. Pawar: Advocate for the Respondent.
Coram : Shri Vilas P. Kadam
Additional Chief Judge,
&
A. H. Baig, Judge,
Court Room No. 41,
Date : 24.07.2023
ORDER: (Per A. H. Baig, Judge)
1. This is an application filed on behalf of respondent for
allowing production of document annexed with the application.
2. Perused the application and say filed. Heard both the
learned Advocates for the parties.
3. The document, which the respondent wants to produce on
record, appears to be relevant and important for deciding the
-- 1 of 2 --
2
application for stay as well as main appeal. That document is already
produced before the trial court in the suit and those were considered by
the trial court while passing impugned order. If only production of that
document is allowed, no serious prejudice will be caused to other side.
Hence, order.
O R D E R
1. The application is allowed in following terms.
2. Production of document only is allowed.
3. Document be taken on record.
I agree,
( Vilas P. Kadam ) ( A.H. Baig )
Additional Chief Judge, Judge
C. R. No. 41 C. R. No. 41
Court of Small Causes,(B.B) Court of Small Causes,(B.B)
24.07.2023 24.07.2023
/home/steno39/Desktop/CR41/JULY2023/ORDER/EXH12APPEAL192023 for production of documents.odt
-- 2 of 2 --