Full Order Text
Interim Order 2 · 01 Nov 2025 · CNR MHSCA30010552024
Order Details: Order on Exhibit Pdf Text: 1 IN THE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AT MUMBAI ( BANDRA BRANCH) ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT – 29 IN R.A.E. & R. SUIT NO. 358 OF 2024 (CNR No. :- MHSCA3-001055-2024) Mrs. Maggie Titus Soares Wd/o. Mr. Titus Soares, ... Plaintiff. Versus 1. Mr. Navin Nandu and Ors., ... Defendants. Appearance:- Smt. E. A. Gonsalves…. Ld. Advocate for the Plaintiff. Mr. H. J. Desai …. Ld. Advocate for the Defendant Nos. 1 and 2. Coram: R. R. Kale, Judge, C. R. No. 36. Date : 01/11/2025. ORDER:- Present application is taken out by the defendant Nos. 5 and 6 to condone the delay caused in filing their written statement and permit them to file it on record. 2. The above defendants submit in their application that, the delay has been caused in filing the written statement within statutory period. On account of reasons stated in the application, the delay of 90 days be condoned and their written statement may kindly be accepted. 3. On the contrary, the plaintiff has filed reply vide Exh. 31 and objected to the prayer of the above defendants. The plaintiff submits in her reply that, the application is filed with malafide and ulterior motives. The defendants are guilty of misrepresenting the facts. Lastly, she has prayed for dismissal of the application. /home/steno36/8. R. R. Kale/2025/Orders/11. November, 2025/01-11-2025/EXH-29 RAER 358 of 2024 - delay condonation in WS.odt KCP -- 1 of 2 -- 2 EXH-29 R.A.E. & R. Suit No. 358 of 2024 4. Heard the Ld. Advocates on behalf of both parties. They have advanced their arguments as per their respective contentions. 5. After perusal of application and say filed by the plaintiff, it seems that, the delay has been caused in filing written statement on record within statutory period by the above defendants. Considering the reasons stated in the application, to decide the real controversy between the parties and in view of the right of above defendants to take defence, present application can be allowed subject to cost since there is delay in taking out the application. It would be just and proper to order to give the said cost to the plaintiff. Thus, I proceed to pass the following order:- : ORDER : 1) Application vide Exh. 29 stands allowed subject to cost of Rs. 500/- (Rs. Five Hundred only) to be given to the plaintiffs on or before next date. 2) The delay caused in filing written statement on record is hereby condoned and the defendant Nos. 5 and 6 are permitted to file their written statement on record. 3) On failure of the defendant Nos. 5 and 6 to pay the cost, the said order shall stand cancelled. (Dictated and pronounced in the open court.) (R. R. Kale) Date : 01/11/2025. Judge, C. R. No. 36. Order dictated on computer : 01/11/2025. Order checked & signed on : 01/11/2025. /home/steno36/8. R. R. Kale/2025/Orders/11. November, 2025/01-11-2025/EXH-29 RAER 358 of 2024 - delay condonation in WS.odt KCP -- 2 of 2 --
