Skip to main content
Court Order

Order 1

CNR MHSCA3000958202124 Mar 2023
Bandra, Small Causes Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Order 1 · 24 Mar 2023 · CNR MHSCA30009582021

Order Details: Order on Exhibit
Pdf Text: 1 RAE4582021Exh9bring LRS.odt
IN THE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AT MUMBAI
(BANDRA BRANCH)
ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT 9
IN
R.A.E. SUIT NO.458 OF 2021
(CNR : MHSCA30009582021)
Mrs. Radha Shivaji Kamble … Plaintiff
V/s
Mr. Prabhakar Shiva Hamjankar and anr. ... Defendants
And
Smt. Supriya Subhash Rawool … Proposed defendant
Advocate for plaintiff : Mr. S. M. Basudkar.
Coram : S. S. Kadam,
Judge, C.R.No.37 (B.B.),
Date : 24.03.2023
ORAL ORDER :
This is an application filed by the plaintiff for to delete
the name of defendant No.2 and to insert the name of proposed
defendant as defendant No.2A in plaint.
2. According to plaintiff, proposed defendant No.2A
intimated the bailiff of this court that defendant No.2 expired on
07.01.2020. Thereafter, plaintiff tried to enquire the name of legal
heirs of the defendant No.2 from the wife of defendant No.2 but she
has not given name of legal heirs and death certificate of defendant
No.2. Hence, this application for to delete the name of defendant
No.2 and insert the name of proposed defendant No.2A.
3. Proposed defendant No.2A has filed reply to this
application below Exh.11 and denied all contentions made in the
application. According to proposed defendant, this application is
/home/steno37/S. S. Kadam-Judge/ORDERS/March-2023/RAE-458-2021-Exh-9-bring LRS.odt ask
-- 1 of 2 --
2 RAE4582021Exh9bring LRS.odt
barred by law of limitation. There is no prayer for setting aside
abatement. The plaintiff has made false statement to mislead this
court. Hence, prayed to reject the application.
4. I have heard learned advocate for plaintiff. Proposed
defendant No.2A and her advocate are absent for argument. This
application is pending since 26.08.2022. Hence, I have decided this
application on its own merits. There is no dispute that defendant
No.2 is not expired. Defendant No.2 is expired on 07.01.2020. There
is delay in filing present application. On record, there is no death
certificate of deceased defendant No.2. I am of the view that to
decide the suit on merits and in the interest of justice, it is necessary
to allow this application. Hence, I proceed to pass following order :
ORDER
1. Application Exh.9 is allowed.
2. Delay in filing this application is condoned
and permission is granted to the plaintiff to
carry out amendment in the plaint within 14
days and supply amended copy of the plaint
till next date.
3. No order as to costs.
(S. S. Kadam)
Judge, C.R.No.37 (B.B.)
24.03.2023
Dictated on : 24.03.2023
Checked & signed on : 24.03.2023
/home/steno37/S. S. Kadam-Judge/ORDERS/March-2023/RAE-458-2021-Exh-9-bring LRS.odt ask
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.