Interim Order 7

Order Details: Order on Exhibit
Pdf Text: 1
MHSCA30008032022
IN THE SMALL CAUSES COURT AT MUMBAI
( BANDRA BRANCH )
ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT NO. 40
IN
R. A. E. & R. SUIT NO. 589 OF 2022
1. MRS. PHILOMENA MERLYN MACHADO & Ors. …PLAINTIFFS
V/S
DR. SATISH NAIK (Full name Not Known) …DEFENDANT
AND
MANJUSHRI WD/O SATISH NAIK ...RESPONDENT
(Proposed Defendant No.1[a])
Ms. Eventa A. Gonsalves, Advocate for Plaintiffs.
Ms. Aakansha R. Sakpal, Advocate for Defendant.
Coram : Shrikrishna H. Inamdar,
Judge, Court Room No.33
Date : 10th October, 2025
ORDER
During pendency of suit, defendant – Mr. Satish Naik is
expired. Manjushri Naik is his legal heir. Therefore, plaintiffs asked
permission to amend the plaint as per schedule.
2. Learned advocate for defendant submitted to the order of the
Court.
3. Heard. After death of defendant, right to sue survives against
her legal heirs. Therefore, I pass following order :
/home/steno33/Desktop/10-10-2025 pdf/Exh 40 in RAE R 589-2022.odt
-- 1 of 2 --
2
ORDER
1. Application is allowed.
2. Plaintiffs are permitted to amend the plaint
as per schedule within stipulated period.
( Dictated and pronounced in open Court. )
( Shrikrishna H. Inamdar )
Date : 10.10.2025 Judge, C. R. No.33
Dictated on : 10.10.2025
Checked & signed on : 10.10.2025
/home/steno33/Desktop/10-10-2025 pdf/Exh 40 in RAE R 589-2022.odt
-- 2 of 2 --