Full Order Text
Interim Order 3 · 30 Oct 2023 · CNR MHSCA30006972023
Order Details: Order on Exhibit Pdf Text: 1 CNR NO.MHSCA-30006972023 IN THE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AT MUMBAI (BANDRA BRANCH) ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT NO.35 IN R.A.E. SUIT NO.312 OF 2023 1. Mrs. Ashmi Atul Parekh and ors. . . Plaintiffs. Versus 1. Mr. Rajesh Himmatlal Shah and ors. . . Defendants. Coram : A.S. Pandagle, Judge C.R.No.32 Date : 30/10/2023. ORAL ORDER : 1. Perused the application and say filed thereon. 2. Heard both sides. 3. Present application is filed on behalf of defendants for stay of order passed below Exh.17 and Exh.19 dated 30/10/2023 and prays for to extend status-quo of 3 weeks till filing of Appeal. 4. Being aggrieved by the order below Exh.17 and Exh.19 dated 30/10/2023, the defendants want to challenge the order before the Appellate Court, therefore wants to prefer an Appeal and therefore seeking relief of to extend the status quo order passed on 9/10/2023 to be extended for 3 weeks to enable the defendants to exercise right to appeal and seek justice before the Appellate Authority. 5. On the other hand, plaintiffs by filing reply resisted the application and contended that the suit building is in dilapidated /home/steno32/Desktop/2023-ASP/Order/Oct/E-35-RAE-312-2023.odt -- 1 of 2 -- 2 condition and moreso after partial demolition. If status quo is extended, it will be a risk to life and limb of persons in the suit property or passers by. Moreover, the defendant No.3 has made a statement before the Hon'ble High Court that he has no objection to demolition of the suit building. The defendant No.1 and 2 have also vacated the suit premises. The order of status-quo does not prevent the plaintiffs from demolition of the suit building by due process of law as ordered by MCGM. Defendants are adequately protected, therefore submitted that application may be rejected. 6. After hearing both sides, gone through the contents of the application and reply filed thereon, also gone through the record of the proceedings. By way of this application defendants want to stay the order passed below Exh.17 and Exh.19 and prays for extension of status-quo order passed on 9/10/2023 for 3 weeks for to exercise right to appeal by preferring appeal before the Appellate Authority. The order below Exh.17 and Exh.19 are passed today after giving opportunity of hearing to both the parties, the said order Exh.17 and Exh.19 passed on merits. Therefore, there is no substance in this application again to extend status-quo order passed on 9/10/2023 in favour of the defendants. Hence, application is rejected. Bandra - Mumbai. ( A.S. Pandagle ) Date : 30/10/2023. Judge, C. R. No.32. - /home/steno32/Desktop/2023-ASP/Order/Oct/E-35-RAE-312-2023.odt -- 2 of 2 --
