Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 2

CNR MHSCA3000614202117 Jun 2023
Bandra, Small Causes Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 2 · 17 Jun 2023 · CNR MHSCA30006142021

Order Details: Order on Exhibit
Pdf Text: .. 1 ..
IN THE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AT MUMBAI
(BANDRA BRANCH)
ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT – 18
IN
R.A.E. SUIT NO. 298 OF 2021
(CNR-MHSCA-3000614-2021)
1. Shri Rakesh Champalal Kothari and Ors. … Plaintiffs
Versus
1. Shri Hastimal Rajmal Tated and Anr. … Defendants
Mr. Lalit V. Jain, Ld. Advocate for Plaintiffs.
Mr. Jainish Jain, Ld. Advocate for Defendants.
Coram :- R. N. Bansal, Judge
C. R. No. 36 [B.B.]
Date :- 17/06/2023
ORDER :
Today plaintiff no. 2 for himself and as C.A. of plaintiff
nos. 1 and 3 is present before the Court. The CA of defendant no. 2
Mr. Pramodkumar Hastimal Bomb is present before the Court.
Also the defendant no. 2 is present through video conference. The
copy of screen-shot of video conference is attached to the file at
Exh. 26. The advocate for the plaintiffs Mr. Lalit V. Jain and the
advocate for the defendants Mr. Jainish Jain are present. The
parties are identified by their respective advocates. The copy of
Affidavit cum Declaration of defendant nos. 1 and 2, General
Power of Attorney of plaintiff no. 1 in favour of plaintiff no. 2, copy
of General Power of Attorney of plaintiff no. 3 in favour of plaintiff
/home/steno36/RNB/2023/Orders/EXH-18 RAE 298 of 2021. 17.06.2023. CT withdrawal VC.odt KCP
-- 1 of 2 --
.. 2 .. EXH-18 R.A.E. Suit No. 279 of 2021
no. 2, General Power of Attorney of defendant no. 2 in favour of
Mr. Pramodkumar Hastimal Bomb and copies of Aadhar Cards of
plaintiff no. 2 and defendant no. 2 are filed on record.
2. The plaintiff no. 2 for himself and as a CA of plaintiff
nos. 1 and 3 and CA of defendant no. 2 have filed this Consent
Terms on record stating that, as compromise took place between
all the plaintiffs and defendant no. 2 in mediation they do not want
to proceed further. The plaintiffs further submitted that, they do
not want to proceed the suit against defendant no. 1 and wants to
withdraw the suit unconditionally against him.
3. Perused Consent Terms. The contents, terms and
conditions of compromise are found to be legal, valid, enforceable
and executable. The contents of Consent Terms are read over and
explained to both the parties in vernacular. They voluntarily
admitted contents, signature and correctness of Consent Terms,
therefore, it is read and recorded.
(R. N. Bansal)
Date : 17/06/2023 Judge, C.R. No. 36
Order dictated and typed on : 17/06/2023
Order checked and signed on : 17/06/2023
/home/steno36/RNB/2023/Orders/EXH-18 RAE 298 of 2021. 17.06.2023. CT withdrawal VC.odt KCP
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.