Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 3

CNR MHSCA3000584202106 Jun 2023
Bandra, Small Causes Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 3 · 06 Jun 2023 · CNR MHSCA30005842021

Order Details: Order on Exhibit
Pdf Text: .. 1 ..
IN THE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AT MUMBAI
(BANDRA BRANCH)
ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT – 24
IN
R.A.E. SUIT NO. 281 OF 2021
(CNR-MHSCA-3000584-2021)
1. Shri Rakesh Champalal Kothari and Ors. ...Plaintiffs
Versus
1. Shri Ravindra Chandulal Patel
(Deleted since deceased)
1(a). Jagruti Ravindra Patel and Ors. ...Defendants
Mr. Lalit V. Jain, Ld. Advocate for Plaintiffs.
M/s. Solicis Lex, Ld. Advocate for Defendants.
Coram :- R. N. Bansal, Judge
C. R. No. 36 [B.B.]
Date :- 06/06/2023
ORDER :
Today plaintiff no. 2 for himself and as C.A. of plaintiff
nos. 1 and 3 is present before the Court. The defendant no. 1a for
himself and as C.A. of defendant nos. 1b to 1d is present before the
Court. Also the defendant nos. 1b to 1d are present through video
conference. The copy of screen-shot of video conference is
attached to the file at Exh. 30. The holding advocate Smt. Sneha
Agrawal for Mr. Lalit V. Jain, advocate for the plaintiffs and the
holding advocate Smt. Pamela N. Dalal for M/s. Solicis Lex,
advocate for the defendants are present. The parties are identified
by their respective advocates. The copy of General Power of
/home/steno36/RNB/2023/Orders/EXH-24 RAE 281 of 2021. 06.06.2023. CT withdrawal VC.odt KCP
-- 1 of 2 --
.. 2 .. EXH-24 R.A.E. Suit No. 281 of 2021
Attorney of plaintiff no. 1 in favour of plaintiff no. 2, copy of
General Power of Attorney of plaintiff no. 3 in favour of plaintiff
no. 2, copy of General Power of Attorney of defendant nos. 1b to 1d
in favour of defendant no. 1a, copies of Aadhar Cards of plaintiff
no. 2 and defendant no. 1a are filed on record.
2. The plaintiff no. 2 for himself and as a CA of plaintiff
nos. 1 and 3 and defendant no. 1a for herself and as a CA of
defendant nos. 1b to 1d have filed this Consent Terms on record
stating that, as compromise took place between all the plaintiffs
and defendant nos. 1a to 1d in mediation they do not want to
proceed further. The plaintiffs further submitted that, they do not
want to proceed the suit against defendant no. 2 and wants to
withdraw the suit unconditionally against him.
3. Perused Consent Terms. The contents, terms and
conditions of compromise are found to be legal, valid, enforcible
and executable. The contents of Consent Terms are read over and
explained to both the parties in vernacular. They voluntarily
admitted contents, signature and correctness of Consent Terms,
therefore, it is read and recorded.
(Dictated and pronounced in open Court.)
(R. N. Bansal)
Date : 06/06/2023 Judge, C.R. No. 36
Order dictated and typed on : 06/06/2023
Order checked and signed on : 06/06/2023
/home/steno36/RNB/2023/Orders/EXH-24 RAE 281 of 2021. 06.06.2023. CT withdrawal VC.odt KCP
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.