Full Order Text
Interim Order 2 · 17 Jun 2026 · CNR MHSCA30005282021
Order Details: Order on Exhibit Pdf Text: 1 IN THE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AT BOMBAY (BANDRA BRANCH) ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT - 15 IN R.A.D. SUIT NO. 312 OF 2021 (MHSCA30005282021) Mr. Pradeep @ Pratap Pranjivandas Merchant … Plaintiffs. Vs. Mrs. Anjali Dharmesh Pandit ...Defendant Appearance : Mr. O. R. Tiwari Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff. Mrs. Vora Vimla R.Ld. Advocate for the defendant. Coram : L.B.M.M.A. Syed, Judge, C.R. No.35 (B.B.) Date : 17.06.2026. ORAL ORDER : The present application is filed by the applicants for carrying out amendment in the plaint. 2. It is the contention of the applicants that, the original plaintiff has filed the present declaratory suit for seeking declaratory reliefs. The applicants reiterate and confirm the averments made by the original plaintiff in the plaint. The matter is at the stage of recording evidence. The original plaintiff died intestate on 14.01.2025, leaving behind the applicants as his legal heirs and representatives. It is therefore, necessary that, legal heirs and representatives should be brought on record, in order to prosecute the suit on merits. Therefore, applicants prayed to allow the application. 3. The defendant has filed her say overleaf of the application and strongly objected the same. It is submitted by the defendant that, no /home/steno35/Steno35/Desktop 2/1LMSyed Court Room NO35/1 June 2026/17-06/Exh 15 RAD 312 of 2021 amendment.odt -- 1 of 2 -- 2 ground is made for taking out this application. No sufficient cause is shown by the applicants to allow the application. There is no sufficient document filed by the applicant to corroborate the the application. Hence, the defendant prayed to reject the application with heavy costs. 4. Heard both the Ld. Advocates for the respective parties. Perused the record, application and say. According to the applicants/proposed plaintiffs, original plaintiff had died on 14.01.2025 leaving behind applicants as his legal heirs and representatives. Present consequential amendment is necessary for proper adjudication of the present suit. Hence, it would be proper to permit to bring the legal heirs of deceased original plaintiff on record and to make amendment as per schedule. If this application is allowed, no prejudice would be caused to the other side. The right to sue survives. Therefore, application is allowed. Hence, I proceed to pass the following order. : O R D E R : 1. The application is allowed. 2. The proposed plaintiffs are permitted to make consequential amendment in the plaint as per schedule annexed. 3. The proposed plaintiffs are directed to file amended copy of the plaint for court record and supply the same to the defendant till next date. (Dictated and pronounced in open court) (L.B.M.M.A. Syed) Date : 17.06.2026 Judge, C. R.No.35 (B.B.) Order dictated on :17.06.2026 Order check and signed on :17.06.2026 /home/steno35/Steno35/Desktop 2/1LMSyed Court Room NO35/1 June 2026/17-06/Exh 15 RAD 312 of 2021 amendment.odt -- 2 of 2 --
