Final Order 3

Order Details: Order on Exhibit
Pdf Text: .. 1 .. /home/steno41/VidyaCR412022/Nov2022CR41/Exh20 R.A. 60 of 2022.odt
MHSCA30005212022
IN THE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AT MUMBAI
(BANDRA BRANCH)
(APPELLATE BENCH)
EXHIBIT NO. 20
IN
REVISION APPL. NO. 60 OF 2022
IN
EXH. No. 28
IN
RAE SUIT NO. 438/613 OF 2017
Mrs. Neelam Dinesh Saxena …..... Applicants
and others. (org. Proposed plaintiffs/
defendants)
Versus
1. Mr. Ramesh Ganesh Saxena
and another. …..... Respondents
(Org. Plaintiff/
org. defendant)
Mr.H.B. Gummala , Advocate for Applicants.
Smt.S.R. Agarwal, Advocate for Respondents.
Coram : Vilas. P. Kadam, Additional Chief Judge
&
A. H. Baig, Judge
Court Room No.41,
Date : 29.11.2022
ORDER : (Per Vilas. P. Kadam, Additional Chief Judge)
1. The advocate for respondent No.1 has filed the present
application for staying the order as they want to challenge the same
before the Hon'ble High court.
2. Other side has filed say and taken strong objection. Heard
both sides.
/home/steno41/VidyaCR412022/Nov2022CR41/Exh20 R.A. 60 of 2022.odt
-- 1 of 2 --
.. 2 .. /home/steno41/VidyaCR412022/Nov2022CR41/Exh20 R.A. 60 of 2022.odt
3. Today, the Revision Petition is allowed. Other side intends
to challenge the said order before the Hon'ble High Court. Thus,
considering the principle of natural justice the said order is required to
stay till 3 weeks. Hence, we proceed to pass following order.
ORDER
1. Application is allowed.
2. Order passed today in Revision Application No. 60 of 2022
is hereby stayed up to 3 weeks from today i.e. from
29.11.2022.
I agree,
(A. H. Baig) (Vilas. P. Kadam)
Judge Additional Chief Judge
Court Room No.41 Court Room No.41
Order dictated on : 29.11.2022
Order transcribed on : 29.11.2022
Order checked on : 29.11.2022
/home/steno41/VidyaCR412022/Nov2022CR41/Exh20 R.A. 60 of 2022.odt
-- 2 of 2 --