Full Order Text
Interim Order 4 · 10 Feb 2026 · CNR MHSCA30004672023
Order Details: Order on Exhibit Pdf Text: ..1.. (CNR No.MHSCA3-000467-2023) IN THE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AT MUMBAI (BANDRA BRANCH) ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT NO.12 IN R.A.E.&.R. SUIT NO.372 OF 2023 Mr. Velji Ranmal Shah … Plaintiff Versus Shri. Rajesh Raghavji Shah … Defendant Shri. Omkarnath R. Tiwari, Ld. Advocate for the plaintiff. Shri. Lalbahadur R. Upadhayay, Ld. Advocate for the defendant. Coram : Smt. J. D. Hushangabade Judge, C.R. No.34. Date : 10.02.2026. ORAL ORDER: 1. This is an application filed by the defendant for condonation of 72 days delay in filing written statement and for taking written statement on record. 2. On the other hand, the plaintiff objected the present application by filing reply vide Exhibit No.20 and submitted that the application is nothing, but an abuse of process of law and the same is not maintainable. No sufficient cause or reasons or reasonable explanation is given for condonation of delay caused in filing the written statement, therefore, the delay cannot be condoned without imposing the costs upon the defendant. The delay has been caused by the defendant deliberately and intentionally. Hence, prayed that /home/steno34/HHJ JDH/2026/February/Exh-12 in R-R S. No.372-23 delay in w.s..odt -- 1 of 3 -- ..2.. to reject the application with costs. 3. It is stated in the application by the defendant that immediately after receiving the summons in the suit, the defendant instructed his present Advocate to appear in the suit on his behalf. As the matter has long story and the copies of the documents relied upon by the plaintiff are not attached with the plaint and certain portion in the plaint are kept blank, therefore, his Advocate immediately posted letter dated 19.10.2023 to the plaintiff’s Advocate calling upon him to give the inspection of the documents relied upon by the plaintiff in the suit to enable his Advocate to prepare the written statement. Due to the aforesaid reasons, the delay is caused in filing the written statement. Hence, prayed that the delay of 72 days in filing written statement be condoned and written statement of the defendant be taken on record. 4. Perused application and say thereon. Heard both sides. The defendant supposed to file written statement within stipulated period of time, but due to reasons well mentioned in the application, written statement could not be filed on time and caused delay. It is settled law that equal opportunities should be given to both the parties. Grounds mentioned by the defendant is found to be just and reasonable one. Admittedly, there is delay on the part of the defendant to file written statement on record. The delay can be compensated by imposing costs. If, the defendant is permitted to file written statement on record, it will not cause any prejudice to the rights of plaintiff. On the contrary the subject matter of the suit will be decided on merit. Hence, in the interest of justice, I proceed to pass following order:- /home/steno34/HHJ JDH/2026/February/Exh-12 in R-R S. No.372-23 delay in w.s..odt -- 2 of 3 -- ..3.. : O R D E R : 1. Application at Exhibit No.12 is allowed, subject to costs of Rs.700/- payable by the defendant to the plaintiff on or before next date. 2. Delay in filing written statement is hereby condoned. 3. Written statement of the defendant be taken on record. Place : Mumbai ( J. D. Hushangabade ) Date : 10.02.2026. Judge, C.R. No.34 (BB). Order dictated & Typed on : 10.02.2026. Order checked & signed on : 12.02.2026. /home/steno34/HHJ JDH/2026/February/Exh-12 in R-R S. No.372-23 delay in w.s..odt -- 3 of 3 --
