Full Order Text
Order 2 · 18 Jun 2024 · CNR MHSCA30000952023
Order Details: Order on Exhibit Pdf Text: .. 1 .. IN THE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AT MUMBAI (BANDRA BRANCH) ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT – 21 IN R.A.D. SUIT NO. 83 of 2023 (CNR No. :- MHSCA3-000095-2023) Mr. Rajesh Damji Vira ... Plaintiff Versus M/s. Indrayani Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. ... Defendant Mr. M. R. Irani, Ld. Advocate for the Plaintiff. Mr. K. K. Thakker, Ld. Advocate for the Defendant. Coram :- P. K. Kharate, Judge C. R. No. 36 [B.B.] Date :- 18/06/2024 ORDER : The plaintiff has filed present application stating that the Court has rejected the application filed below Order 7 Rule 11 of the defendant on 28/11/2023. Then defendant has preferred the Revision Application No. 8 of 2024 before the Hon’ble Appellate Court which is allowed on 15/02/2024. Then the plaintiff has filed the Civil Revision Application being CRAST/15808/2024 on 10/06/2024 before the Hon’ble High Court against the order of the Hon’ble Appellate Bench. Hence, prayed that present suit be allowed to be continued till disposal of the CRA. 2. The say filed by the defendant on same application stating that Hon’ble Appellate Bench has already rejected the suit on 15/02/2024. Therefore, this Court cannot consider the plea raised by the plaintiff as same is beyond the scope of jurisdiction of the Court. -- 1 of 2 -- .. 2 .. EXH-21 R.A.D. Suit No. 83 of 2023 3. Heard both sides at length. 4. It is no doubt that the present Court has rejected the application of the defendant filed below Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC on 28/11/2023. The Hon’ble Appellate Court has passed the order and allowed the revision application of the defendant on 15/02/2024. It means, the order of the Hon’ble Appellate Court is as good as plaint is rejected. The advocate for plaintiff argued that the order of the Hon’ble Appellate Court is not final one. Hence, he required sufficient time to challenge the said order before the Hon’ble High Court. It is no doubt that already three months are elapsed. But, considering the summer vacation only one month time is granted to the plaintiff to obtain the order. If plaintiff failed then considering the order of the Hon’ble Appellate Court the plaint will be rejected. The plaintiff has ample chance to restore the suit if he will succeed in the Hon’ble High Court in Civil Revision Application No. CRAST/15808/2024. Hence, no prejudice will be caused to the plaintiff even if the plaint is rejected on next date. Hence, I pass the following order : ORDER 1. The application below Exh. 21 is allowed. 2. Time is granted to the plaintiff till 18/07/2024 to obtain the order from the Hon’ble High Court. 3. Both parties to take note. (P. K. Kharate) Date : 18/06/2024 Judge, C.R. No. 36 Order dictated and typed on : 18/06/2024 Order checked and signed on : 18/06/2024 /home/steno36/7. P.K. Kharate/2024/6. June, 2024/Orders/17.06.2024/EXH-21 RAD 83 of 2023. remove matter from order caption.odt KCP -- 2 of 2 --
