Order 2

Order Details: Order on T.I.
Pdf Text: 1 Revision No.8-2026 Exhibit-16
MHSCA30000752026
IN THE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, AT MUMBAI
(APPELLATE BENCH)
(BANDRA BRANCH)
ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT-16
IN
REVISION APPLICATION NO. 8 OF 2026
IN
EXHIBIT NO.13
IN
RAE SUIT NO. 203 OF 2024
Narshing Ladhuram Chawla ...Applicant/
(Prop. Defendant)
Versus
1. Jagdish Ladhuram Chawla & Ors … Respondents/
(Original Plaintiff and
defendants )
And
2a. Bhanwari Laxminarayanji Saloon & Ors ..Proposed
respondents
Mr. Rajendra P. Mishra learned advocate for the applicant.
Mr .Manoj Badsiwal learned advocate for the respondent No.1.
Mr. Hasmukh Danewalla learned advocate for respondent No.3.
Coram : Sambhaji D. Thakare
Addl. Chief Judge
&
Yogeshkumar K. Rahangdale
Addl. Chief Judge
C. R. No. 41 (B.B.)
Date :10th Day of September, 2026
-- 1 of 3 --
2 Revision No.8-2026 Exhibit-16
ORDER : (Per Sambhaji D. Thakare, Addl. Chief Judge)
This is an application of the applicant for extension of time
to carry out the amendment as per the order passed by this court below
Exhibit-15 dated 21.07.2026. According to the applicant, the applicant
was admitted in the hospital two times. Hence, he could not carry out
the amendment within the stipulated period. Hence, extension of time
may be granted.
2. The respondent No.1 has resisted this application by filing
reply and stated that there is no sufficient cause for extension of time to
carry out the amendment. Hence, application may be rejected.
3. The respondent No.3 has given no objection for extension
of time to carry out the amendment by the applicant.
4. We have heard Mr. Utkarsh Singh, learned advocate
holding for Mr. R. R. Mishra, learned advocate for applicant. Mr. Manoj
Badsiwal, learned advocate for respondent No.1 and Mr. Hasmukh
Danewalla, learned advocate for respondent No.3.
5. It is seen that as per the order passed below Exhibit-15 this
court has allowed the applicant to bring the legal heirs of deceased
respondent No.2 on record and permitted the applicant to carry out the
amendment. It is seen that the applicant was not feeling well and he
was admitted in the hospital. The contention of the applicant has been
supported by an affidavit. Hence, we find that due to the reasons
beyond the control of the applicant, he could not carry out the
amendment within the stipulated period. Hence, we pass the following
order.
-- 2 of 3 --
3 Revision No.8-2026 Exhibit-16
ORDER
1. Application is allowed.
2. The applicant is permitted to carry out the
amendment within 15 days from today.
3. No order as to costs.
I Agree,
(Yogeshkumar K. Rahangdale) (Sambhaji D. Thakare)
Addl. Chief Judge Addl. Chief Judge,
C. R. No. 41 C. R. No. 41
Court of Small Causes,(B.B) Court of Small Causes,(B.B)
10.09.2026 10.09.2026
-- 3 of 3 --