Full Order Text
Order 1 · 21 Jul 2026 · CNR MHSCA30000752026
Order Details: Order on Exhibit Pdf Text: CNR NO.MHSCA30000752026 IN THE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AT MUMBAI [BANDRA BRANCH] (Appellate Bench) ORDER BELOW EXH-15 IN REVISION APPLICATION NO. 8 OF 2026 IN EXHIBIT NO. -13 IN RAE SUIT NO. 203 OF 2024 Narsing Ladhuram Chawla ...Applicant/ (Prop. Defendant) Versus 1. Jagdish Ladhuram Chawla & Ors … Respondents/ (Original Plaintiff and defendants ) And 2a. Bhanwari Laxminarayanji Saloon & Ors ..Proposed respondents Adv. Rajendra P. Mishra for the applicant Adv. Manoj Badsiwal for the respondent No.1 Adv. Hasmukh Danewalla for respondent No.3 Coram : Sambhaji D. Thakare, Additional Chief Judge, & Yogeshkumar K. Rahangdale, Additional Chief Judge Court Room No. 41, Date :21.07.2026 -- 1 of 3 -- Exh- 15 Revision No.8 /2026 2 of 3 Order ORDER: - (Per Yogeshkumar K. Rahangdale, Additional Chief Judge) In RAE Suit No. 203 of 2024, pending before the Court No. 32 (BB), the present applicant has sought his impleadment in the said suit by moving an application at Exh. 13 which application was rejected by the learned Trial Court by its order dated 17.09.2026 , against which the present revision application came to be filed. 2. This application at Exh. 15 is filed to bring the legal heir and representatives of respondent No. 2 in the cause title of the application. In para No.4 of the application the names of legal heirs and representatives of respondent No. 2 are given. 3. Today, we heard learned Counsel for applicant/revision Advocate Hasan Shaikh holding for the counsel for the applicant, Advocate Manoj Badsiwal for the respondent No.1 and Advocate Hasmukh Danewalla for respondent No. 3. 4. The learned counsel for respondent No.1 strongly objected the present application mainly on the ground that date of death of respondent No. 2 is not mentioned in the application. He further submitted that death certificate is not annexed in support of the contentions made in the application. 5. Perusal of the application shows that respondent No.2 died on 02.07.2026. This statement is made on oath. Therefore, we do not find any substance in the objection raised by the learned counsel for respondent No.1. Considering the nature of the application, following order is passed. -- 2 of 3 -- Exh- 15 Revision No.8 /2026 3 of 3 Order O R D E R 1. The application is allowed. 2. The names of legal heirs and representatives of deceased respondent No.2 be brought on record in the cause title of the Revision application by carrying out amendment, on or before next date. I Agree, (Sambhaji D. Thakare) (Yogeshkumar K. Rahangdale) Additional Chief Judge Additional Chief Judge, C.R. No. 41 C.R. No. 41 Court of Small Causes,(B.B) Court of Small Causes,(B.B) 21.07.2026 21.07.2026 /home/steno41/Desktop/CR-41/2026/JULY/ORDER/Exh-15- REVISION-8-2026.odt Shubhada Shanbhag -- 3 of 3 --
