Full Order Text
Order 1 · 10 Aug 2026 · CNR MHMM260016722026
Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS), 36th COURT MUMBAI CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI. C. C. NO. :- 72/SW/2026. CNR NO. :- MHMM26-001672-2026. Exh. :- The Union of India, Through Railway Protection Force, Andheri R.P. F., Mumbai. (C. R. No. 08/2026). …. Complainant. V/s. 1. Nijam s/o Kiazamuddin Khan Age :- 30 Years, Occupation :- labour. R/o. :- Bandra (E), Mumbai. 2. Raju s/o Iliyas Shaikh Age :- 28 Years, Occupation :- labour. R/o. :- Bandra (E), Mumbai. …. Accused. Charge :- Punishable under section 3 (a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966. JUDGMENT (Delivered on 10th day of August 2026) The accused are in jail, as an under trial prisoners. Today, the accused are produced before the Court through video conference. The accused are facing trial for the offence punishable under section 3 (a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966. The accused submitted that they want to plead guilty. Accordingly, the charge is framed against the accused for the offence punishable under section 3 (a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966. The contents of charge were read over and explained to the accused in their vernacular. The accused again voluntarily pleaded guilty. I therefore, hold the accused guilty for the offence punishable under section 3 (a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 and proceed to hear them on the point of sentence. 2. I have heard the accused on the point of sentence. They submitted that they are from poor families. They are the sole bread earner of their families. Accordingly, the accused requested to take lenient view, while imposing sentence. 3. The accused are poor persons. So also, the railway property in respect of which the offence had been committed, has already been -- 1 of 2 -- recovered and seized. The accused are first time offenders and there are no criminal antecedents against them, so lenient view needs to be taken while imposing sentence upon the accused. In the circumstances above the following sentence would be sufficient to meet the ends of justice. In result thereof, I pass the following order :- ORDER 01) Accused No. 01 namely Nijam s/o Kiazamuddin Khan and accused no. 02 namely Raju s/o Iliyas Shaikh are convicted for the offence punishable under section 3 (a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act vide section 269 (3) of the BNSS, 2023 and they are sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 03 (Three) months each and to pay fine of Rs. 2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only) each, in default of payment of fine the accused are sentenced to suffer Simple Imprisonment for 07 (Seven) days each. 02) The period of detention, if any undergone by the accused during course investigation, inquiry or trial of the case, be set off against the term of imprisonment imposed on them vide section 468 of the BNSS. 03) The accused have also been convicted in C.C. No. 71/SW/2026. The substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed on the accused in the present case and in C.C. No. 71/SW/2026 shall run concurrently vide section 467(1) of the BNSS. 04) Case to proceed against accused no. 03. 05) Copy of judgment be given to the accused free of cost. Date : 10.08.2026. Alam sd/- (Tushar B. Waje) Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 36th Court, Mumbai Central Railway, Mumbai. -- 2 of 2 --
