Final Order 1

Order Details: Bail Order
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
36th COURT, MUMBAI CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI.
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 256 OF 2026
CNR NO. :- MHMM26-001503-2026
IN
C.C. NO. 86/SW/2022
2. Suraj Kumar s/o Rampal Gautam …. Applicant/Accused
V/s.
The Union of India
Through Bandra Terminus
Railway Protection Force, Mumbai. .… Respondent.
Appearance :- Shri. G. K. Shetty, Ld. Advocate for the
Applicant/accused.
Shri. A. K. Singh, Ld. Sr. P. P. for the
Respondent.
ORDER PASSED BELOW BAIL APPLICATION EXH. 27.
(Passed on 31st day of July, 2026)
This is an application for fresh bail moved by the
accused namely Suraj Kumar s/o Rampal Gautam in connection
with C. R. No. 10/2022 registered in the Bandra Terminus Railway
Protection Force, for the offence punishable under section 3 (a) of
the RP (UP) Act.
2. The Ld. Advocate Shri G. K. Shetty for the accused
submitted that the accused could not remain present before the
Court on earlier date due to unavoidable circumstances. He further
submitted that the accused had no intention to delay or derail the
proceedings, and now the accused undertakes to appear regularly
before the Court and abide by the conditions as may be imposed
on him.
3. Accordingly, say of Ld. Sr. P. P. was called. Ld. Sr. P. P.
has filed his say and objected the application on the grounds that
if the accused released on bail he would abscond. The accused
would also pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
4. On perusal of the record, it is evident that the accused
-- 1 of 3 --
was absent, which led to the issuance of a non-bailable warrant
against him. However, the accused is now in custody and has
expressed his willingness to abide by the conditions of bail and co-
operate with the trial. The offence in question is non-bailable and
cognizable, and the trial is at initial stage. Therefore, it would not
be just and proper to keep the accused behind the bar for uncertain
period, as the trial would take its own time to conclude. Hence, if
the bail application is allowed thereby imposing certain conditions,
it would meet the ends of justice. Hence, in result thereof, I pass
the following order :-
ORDER
1. The Bail Application No. 256 of 2026 is allowed and
disposed of.
2. Accused namely Suraj Kumar s/o Rampal Gautam is
released on bail on executing his P. R. Bond of
Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) with one
solvent surety in the like amount. Provisional cash bail
of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) is
allowed for Four weeks.
3. The Earlier bail bonds/cash bail of the accused be
forfeited to the State, if same were not forfeited earlier.
4. The accused shall attend each and every date fixed for
hearing and shall not tamper the prosecution evidence
till conclusion of trial.
5. Accused shall submit authenticated copy of his identity
and address proof.
6. Office to inform to the accused immediately. Issue letter
to the Jail Authority accordingly.
Date :- 31.07.2026.
Alam.
sd/-
(Tushar B. Waje)
Metropolitan Magistrate,
36th Court, Mumbai Central Railway, Mumbai.
-- 2 of 3 --
-- 3 of 3 --