Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 2

CNR MHMM26001323202608 Jul 2026
Mumbai Central, MM Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 2 · 08 Jul 2026 · CNR MHMM260013232026

Order Details: Copy  of Judgment
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS),
36th COURT MUMBAI CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI.
C. C. NO. :- 59/SW/2026.
CNR NO. :- MHMM26-001323-2026 Exh. :- ________
The Union of India,
Through Railway Protection Force,
Churchgate, Mumbai.
(C. R. No. 06/2026). …. Complainant.
V/s.
2. Suresh Kumar Dangi
Age :- 30 Years, Occupation :- Nil
R/o. :- Saki Naka, Mumbai. …. Accused.
Charge :- Punishable under section 3 (a) of the Railway Property
(Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.
JUDGMENT
(Delivered on 08th day of July, 2026)
Today, the accused is present before the Court with his Ld.
Advocate Shri. Kiran Rane. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty vide
Exh.07. The accused is facing trial for the offence punishable under
section 3 (a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.
Accordingly, the charge is framed against the accused for the offence
punishable under section 3 (a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful
Possession) Act, 1966. The contents of charge were read over and
explained to the accused in his vernacular. The accused again
voluntarily pleaded guilty. I therefore, hold the accused guilty for the
offence punishable under section 3 (a) of the Railway Property
(Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 and proceed to hear him on the point
of sentence.
2. I have heard the Ld. Advocate Shri. Kiran Rane for the
accused. He has submitted that accused has not been previously
convicted. He further submitted that the accused will not commit such
type of offence in future. The accused is the only earning member of his
family and therefore he prays for leniency.
3. The accused is a poor person. So also, the railway property
-- 1 of 2 --
in respect of which the offence had been committed, has already been
recovered and seized. The accused is a first time offender and there are
no criminal antecedents against him, so lenient view needs to be taken
while imposing sentence upon the accused. In the circumstances above
the following sentence would be sufficient to meet the ends of justice.
In result thereof, I pass the following order :-
ORDER
01) The accused no. 02 namely Suresh Kumar Dangi is
convicted for the offence punishable under section 3
(a) of the Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act,
1966 Act vide section 269 (3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik
Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and he is sentenced to suffer
simple imprisonment till rising of the Court and he is
also sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 12,000/- (Rupees
Twelve Thousand Only) in default of payment of fine
the accused shall suffer simple imprisonment for 01
(One) month.
02) The accused to surrender to his bail bonds.
03) The seized muddemal property be returned to the
authorized person of concern department of the
Western Railway, after appeal period is over.
04) Copy of judgment be given to the accused free of cost.
Date : 08.07.2026.
Alam
sd/-
(Tushar B. Waje)
Judicial Magistrate (First Class),
36th Court, Mumbai Central Railway, Mumbai.
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.