Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHMM26001183202601 Jun 2026
Mumbai Central, MM Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 01 Jun 2026 · CNR MHMM260011832026

Order Details: Bail Order
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FIRST CLASS),
36th COURT, MUMBAI CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI.
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 200 OF 2026
IN
C.R. NO. 06/2026 OF THE BANDRA TERMINUS RAILWAY
PROTECTION FORCE, MUMBAI.
Hasmukh s/o Amarchand Jain …. Applicant/Accused
V/s.
The Union of India
Through Bandra Terminus
Railway Protection Force, Mumbai. .… Respondent.
Appearance :- Shri. P. M. Kumar, Ld. Advocate for
the Applicant/accused.
Shri. A. K. Singh, Ld. Sr. P. P. for the
Respondent.
ORDER PASSED BELOW BAIL APPLICATION
(Passed on 01st day of June 2026)
This is an application for bail moved by the accused
under section 480 of the BNSS in connection with C. R. No. 06/2026
registered with the RPF Bandra Terminus, for the offence punishable
under section 3 (a) of the RP (UP) Act.
2. Read the application. Accordingly say of Ld. Senior P. P.
and the E.O. was called. The E. O. filed his say and objected the
application on the ground that if the accused is released on bail he
would abscond and also pressurize the prosecution witnesses. The Ld.
Senior P. P. has also filed his say on the present bail application,
wherein he submitted that the enquiry of the crime is in progress. The
accused was found in unlawful possession the railway property. If the
accused is released on bail, he would tamper the evidence and
thereby hamper the enquiry.
3. Heard the Ld. Advocate Shri. P. M. Kumar for the
accused. Admittedly, the offence is non bailable, but not punishable
with death or imprisonment for life. It is alleged that the accused was
found in unlawful possession of the railway property, which has
-- 1 of 2 --
already been recovered.
4. Under the circumstances and considering the grounds
stated in the application, if bail is granted to the accused subject to
certain conditions no harm or prejudice would be caused to the
prosecution. Hence, I pass the following order :-
ORDER
1. The Bail Application No. 200 of 2026 is allowed and disposed
of.
2. The accused namely Hasmukh s/o Amarchand Jain is released
on executing his P. R. Bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen
Thousand Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount.
3. The accused shall not tamper the prosecution evidence and
shall not hamper the investigation and shall not make any
inducement to the person acquainted with the facts of the case,
so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the police or
to Court.
4. The accused shall attend the concern Enquiry Officer as and
when required.
5. The accused shall co-operate the Enquiry Officer.
6. The accused shall furnish authenticated copy of his identity
and address proof.
7. Accused shall not indulge himself in the same kind of offence
here-in-after.
8. Provisional cash bail of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand
Only) is granted to the accused for Four weeks.
9. Office to inform to the accused immediately. Issue letter to the
Jail Authority accordingly.
Date :- 01.06.2026.
Alam
sd/-
(Tushar B. Waje)
Judicial Magistrate (First Class),
36th Court, Mumbai Central Railway, Mumbai.
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.