Full Order Text
Final Order 1 · 20 Feb 2026 · CNR MHMM260007952023
Order Details: Copy of Judgment Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, 36th COURT MUMBAI CENTRAL RAILWAY, MUMBAI. C. C. NO. 98/SW/2023. Exh. :- The Union of India, Through Railway Protection Force, Churchgate R. P. F., Mumbai. (C. R. No. 757/2023). …. Complainant. V/s. 1. Vijay s/o Ramprasad Chaurasiya Age :- 55 Years., Occupation :- Business. R/o. :- Kalbadevi Road, Mumbai 2. Santosh Kumar s/o Lalataprasad Chaurasiya Age :- 41 Years., Occupation :- Nil R/o. :- Nalasopara, Palghar. …. Accused. Charge :- Punishable under section 143(1)(a) of the Railways Act, 1989. JUDGMENT (Delivered on 20th day of February 2026) Today, the accused are present before the Court with their Ld. Advocate Shri. B. N. Tiwari. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty vide Exh.17. The accused are facing trial for the offence punishable under section 143(1)(a) of the Railway Act, 1989. Accordingly, the charge is framed against the accused for the offence punishable under section 143(1)(a) of the Railway Act, 1989. The contents of charge were read over and explained to the accused in their vernacular. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty. I therefore, hold the accused guilty for the offence punishable under section 143(1)(a) of the Railway Act, 1989 and proceed to hear them on the point of sentence. 2. I have heard the Ld. Advocate Shri. B. N. Tiwari for the accused. He has submitted that accused have not been previously convicted. He further submitted that the accused will not commit such type of offence in future. The accused are the only earning member of their families and therefore he prays for leniency. I have also heard the Ld. Sr. P. P.. He submitted that maximum fine sentence may be imposed. 3. The accused are poor persons. So also, the accused are the -- 1 of 3 -- first time offender and there are no criminal antecedents against them. Therefore, lenient view needs to be taken while imposing sentence upon the accused. In the circumstances above, the following sentence would be sufficient to meet the ends of justice. In result thereof, I pass the following order :- ORDER 01) Accused no. 01 Vijay s/o Ramprasad Chaurasiya and accused no. 02 Santosh Kumar s/o Lalataprasad Chaurasiya are hereby convicted for the offence punishable under section 143(1)(a) of the Railways Act, 1989 vide section 246 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and they are sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment till rising of the Court and they are also sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each in default of payment of fine the accused are sentenced to suffer Simple Imprisonment for 15 (Fifteen) days each. 02) The accused to surrender their bail bonds. 03) The seized 23 nos. live E-ticket and 124 nos. used E- tickets be destroyed, as per rules, after the appeal period is over. 04) The amount of seized live E-ticket be forfeited to the Western Railway. 05) The seized One Plus Company mobile handset and Dell Company Laptop have already been temporarily returned to the accused no. 01 on executing his indemnity bond. The said indemnity bond shall stand cancelled after appeal period is over and the said accused to retain the said mobile handset and Laptop absolutely. -- 2 of 3 -- 06) Copy of judgment be given to the accused free of cost. Date :- 20.02.2026. Alam. sd/- (Tushar B. Waje) Metropolitan Magistrate, 36th Court, Mumbai Central Railway, Mumbai. -- 3 of 3 --
