Skip to main content
SS Cases

F/N WARD SHOP AND ESTABLISHMENT DEPARTMENT (THROUGH - SITARAM GANESH BANDEKAR)VsVIVEK MANOHAR NAYAK AND 12 OTHER +2 more

CNR MHMM2100891420251-41st Court ,Judicial Magistrate(First Class)
Dadar Shindewadi, MM Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--Plead guilty
Decision Date: 25th November 2025

TrustJury record updated 07 Oct 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
8411/2025
Registration Date
03 Nov 2025

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    4

    Petitioner

    1. 1F/N WARD SHOP AND ESTABLISHMENT DEPARTMENT (THROUGH - SITARAM GANESH BANDEKAR)

    Respondent

    1. 1VIVEK MANOHAR NAYAK AND 12 OTHER
    2. 2MANOHAR VAIKUNTH NAYAK
    3. 3VIKRAM MANOHAR NAYAK

    Acts & Sections

    1
    Maharashtra Shops and Establishments Act · Sec 36A(1)RWR35

    Police / FIR Details

    Police Station
    MATUNGA POLICE STATION
    FIR Number / Year
    0

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 25-11-2025
Business: Ld. ALO is present
Accused No.1 is present
Accused No.2 and 3 are  absent
A. No.1 is represent for A. No.2 and 3
Advocate is present
Authority letter filed
Exh- 02 Vakalatnama
Exh- 03  Application for plead guilty - Order passed- Accused are convicted and sentence to pay fine as per order, I.D to S.I.for 30 days.
Nature Of Disposal: Plead guilty
Disposal Date: 25-11-2025

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 1435/2025
Filing Date: 03-11-2025
eFiling Number: LMH20250020436C202500007
eFiling Date: 03-11-2025
First Hearing Date: 25th November 2025
Decision Date: 25th November 2025
Court Number And Judge: 1-41st Court ,Judicial Magistrate(First Class)

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    25 Nov 2025
    Order Details: Order below Exh.1
Pdf Text: oooSui i I
- /SS/202	COURT CASE NO.410
IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
«ST COURT, SHINDEWADI, DADaSmT
Name of the complainant
Name of the accused
1.
. The Mumbai Municipal Corporation
Ward
ri)v^iVejr
qrA ^ H ci v
( m aya Oo
: 36A(l)RWR35ofM.S.E.Act
copy of complaint and other documents ?
2
3. Particulars of offence
Q.Ol
Ans.
Have you received the
Yes.
Q.02 Have you understood the particulars of the offence
Do you plead guilty or claims to be tried ?
Yes, I plead guilty.
explained to you ?	Ans.
Q.03
Ans.
Before Me,
r.no.s33^^°
Date--2-51
Accused/Representative
Judicial Magistrate (First Class),
41^^ Court, Shindewadi, Dadar, Mumbai
ORDER
The plea of Accused/Representative made voluntary
sides. Considering the nature of offence, accused is/are
offence 36A(1)RWR ,TS which is punishaWe under section 29^
Act and sentenced to pay fine ofRs.^l-'^rh m.
in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 30 days.
If any order of warrant is issued against accused stands cancelled.
SlilndewiS'' i. Court Dadar
NvjtTibai.
IS accepted. Heard both
convicted for the
.S.E
rfiEach)
(A. W. Kshirsagar)
Judicial Magistrate (First Class),
4r‘ Court, Shindewadi, Dadar, Mumbai.
Date;*2X' /]\ /2025
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.