Skip to main content
Court Order

Final Order 1

CNR MHMM19016734202130 Jul 2022
Andheri, MM Court
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
Back to Case

Full Order Text

Final Order 1 · 30 Jul 2022 · CNR MHMM190167342021

Order Details: Copy  of Judgment
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
65TH COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI.
C. C. No.3071/PW/2021
CR. NO.582/2021
Name of accused : Himanshu Mahesh Varma
Age : 21 Year , Occupation : Nil
R/o : Masjestry building, Room No.210
Uttar Pradesh
CHARGE
I, C.P. Kashid, hereby charge you accused as follows:
That on 07.08.2021 at about 09.10 p.m., in front Parleshwar
Gym, Vileparle East, Mumbai, you accused along with absconding
accused committed the robbery of gold Chain having diamond
approximately worth of Rs.2,00,000/ from informant and thereby
committed an offence P/U/Sec.392 r/w Sec.34 of the IPC.
And within my cognizance.
PLEA OF THE ACCUSED.
Q. 1 Have you received the papers?
Ans. Yes.
Q. 2 Have you understood the charge ?
Ans. Yes.
Q. 3 Do you plead guilty to the charge ?
Ans. Yes, I do plead guilty.
Signature of accused
Sd/
(C.P. Kashid)
Metropolitan Magistrate,
65th Court, Andheri, Mumbai.
Date : 30.07.2022
-- 1 of 2 --
IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
65TH COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI.
C. C. No.3071/PW/2021
CR. NO.582/2021
Name of accused : Himanshu Mahesh Varma
Age : 21 Year , Occupation : Nil
R/o : Masjestry building, Room No.210
Uttar Pradesh
JUDGMENT
Accused Himanshu Mahesh Varma has filed application and
voluntarily pleaded guilty. The offence alleged against accused is
punishable under Sec.392 r/w Sec.34 of Indian Penal Code.
Therefore, considering the nature of offence, the plea of accused is
accepted and I proceed to pass the following order:
O R D E R
1) The accused Himanshu Mahesh Varma is convicted as per
sec. 241 of Cr.P.C for the offence P/U/Sec. 392 r/w Sec.34 of IPC
and he is sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for One year &
to pay fine of Rs.1,000/ (Rs. One Thousand Only) & in default to
suffer S. I. For 5 days.
2) Accused be given set off against the term of imprisonment
imposed on him vide Sec.428 of the CrPC.
3) Seized muddemal be returned to the informant (if not
returned) after appeal period is over.
Sd/
(C.P. Kashid)
Metropolitan Magistrate
Dt. 30.07.2022 65th Court, Andheri, Mumbai
-- 2 of 2 --

TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.