Skip to main content
Summons Private cases SS

SHYAM SHRIRAM UIKEYVsDEEPAK KANTILAL SHAH

CNR MHMM19015507201844-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 44th Court
Metropolitan Magistrate, Andheri, Mumbai
Mumbai · Maharashtra (MH)
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--258 CRPC PROCEEDING STOPPED
Decision Date: 22nd July 2024

TrustJury record updated 29 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
4404343/2018
Registration Date
26 Oct 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Petitioner

    1. 1SHYAM SHRIRAM UIKEY

    Respondent

    1. 1DEEPAK KANTILAL SHAH

    Acts & Sections

    1
    DRUGS AND COSMETICS ACT · Sec 138

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 01-02-2020
Business: Complainant and his advocate is absent since long.
No step taken by complainant . Hence,
for step .
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 03-07-2020

Date: 03-07-2020
Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 31-10-2020

Date: 31-10-2020
Business: As per order of Hon,ble CMM Court, board is discharged due to lockdown regarding COVID -19 VIRUS
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 14-01-2021

Date: 14-01-2021
Business: Both party are ab. Their Adv also ab. Adj for step/
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 05-05-2021

Date: 05-05-2021
Business: As per the order of Hon''ble C.M.M. Court, Board is being discharged due to lockdown to prevent transmission of the second wave of coivd-19 virus.
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 05-08-2021

Date: 05-08-2021
Business: Complainant absent  his advocate is present. Accused absent his advocate is absent. Adv for complainant pray for date. Hence, as per request date is given. No step taken by complainant. For step
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 01-12-2021

Date: 01-12-2021
Business: Both party are absent. Their advocate also absent. For Step
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 02-05-2022

Date: 02-05-2022
Business: M M is on vacation leave charge with M. M 48th court board discharge
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 22-09-2022

Date: 22-09-2022
Business: For steps
27-02-2023
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 27-02-2023

Date: 27-02-2023
Business: Ld. MM is on leave.
Board is discharged.
13-10-2023
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 13-10-2023

Date: 13-10-2023
Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent when matter is called out.
Next Purpose: For Steps
Next Hearing Date: 24-04-2024

Date: 24-04-2024
Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent when matter is called out.
No steps are taken since long.
For dismissal order.
22-07-2024
Next Purpose: FOR SPECIAL DRIVE
Next Hearing Date: 22-07-2024

Date: 22-07-2024
Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent when matter is called out.
No steps are taken since long.
Today matter kept for special drive.
Complaint is dismissed.
For reason separately recorded.
Hence disposed.
Nature Of Disposal: 258 CRPC PROCEEDING STOPPED
Disposal Date: 22-07-2024

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 813321/2018
Filing Date: 26-10-2018
First Hearing Date: 01st February 2020
Decision Date: 22nd July 2024
Court Number And Judge: 44-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 44th Court

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    22 Jul 2024
    Order Details: Order below Ex-1
Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS,
ANDHERI, MUMBAI.
C.C. No.4343/SS/2018
MR. SHYAM SHRIRAM UIKEY …. Complainant
V/s.
MR. DEEPAK KANTILALA SHAH …. Accused
ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT NO.1
(Passed on 22/07/2024)
The present case on hand came to be filed under Section 138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act.
2. Having gone through the roznama and case papers, it appears
that the complainant is absent since long time. Moreover, no positive step
was taken by the complainant within a span of last six years. Thus, this case
is unattended. In such circumstances, it appears that the case comes within
the ambit of stale and ineffective case. Hence, having regard to the pendency
of the case, it is required to be disposed of in the Special Drive. Resultantly, I
pass the following order:
ORDER
i] The case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
ii] The original documents filed in this case be returned to the concerned
parties.
iii] The case be closed accordingly.
Sd/
(Sujitkumar C. Tayde)
Judicial Magistrate First Class,
Date: 22/07/2024 Andheri, Mumbai.
spj
-- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.