Skip to main content
Summons Private cases SS

SIDHESH SANJAY DALVIVsSALMANAHMAD RAFIQUE SHAIKH

CNR MHMM19015113201844-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 44th Court
CASE DISPOSED
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Decision Date: 04th December 2023

TrustJury record updated 28 Sept 2026

Case Overview

Registration Number
4404805/2018
Registration Date
01 Dec 2018

Advocates

1

For Petitioner

For Respondent

    Not available

    Parties

    2

    Acts & Sections

    1
    DRUGS AND COSMETICS ACT · Sec 138

    Case History / Proceedings

    Case History
    Date: 19-02-2019
    Business: Today is declare holiday.
    Hence adj
    Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
    Next Hearing Date: 04-09-2019
    
    Date: 04-09-2019
    Business: Ld. M.M. is on Leave. Hence Board discharged. Charged with M.M. 48th Court, Mumbai.
    Next Purpose: FOR VERIFICATION
    Next Hearing Date: 06-02-2020
    
    Date: 06-02-2020
    Next Purpose: For Steps
    Next Hearing Date: 30-06-2020
    
    Date: 30-06-2020
    Business: Board is discharged as per order of Hon,ble CMM Court due to Lockdwon for precaution to spread COVID - 19 VIRUS.
    Next Purpose: For Steps
    Next Hearing Date: 02-09-2020
    
    Date: 02-09-2020
    Reason For Adjournment: Adjourned due to Covid-19
    Next Purpose: For Steps
    Next Hearing Date: 01-04-2021
    
    Date: 01-04-2021
    Business: BOTH PARTIES ARE AB HIS ADV AB
    Next Purpose: For Steps
    Next Hearing Date: 12-08-2021
    
    Date: 12-08-2021
    Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent since long. No step taken by complainant. Hence,  Adj for step.
    Next Purpose: For Steps
    Next Hearing Date: 02-03-2022
    
    Date: 02-03-2022
    Business: Ld M M visit to jail court. hence board discharge
    Next Purpose: For Steps
    Next Hearing Date: 09-06-2022
    
    Date: 09-06-2022
    Business: both parties are absent
    Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
    Next Hearing Date: 12-08-2022
    
    Date: 12-08-2022
    Business: both parties are absent
    Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
    Next Hearing Date: 23-12-2022
    
    Date: 23-12-2022
    Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent.
    11-04-2023
    Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
    Next Hearing Date: 11-04-2023
    
    Date: 11-04-2023
    Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent when matter is called out.
    11-09-2023
    Next Purpose: NOT HEARD CASES
    Next Hearing Date: 11-09-2023
    
    Date: 11-09-2023
    Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent when matter is called out.
    For dismissal order.
    04-12-2023
    Next Purpose: FOR SPECIAL DRIVE
    Next Hearing Date: 04-12-2023
    
    Date: 04-12-2023
    Business: Complainant and his advocate are absent since long.
    No steps are taken.
    Today matter is kept for dismissal order.
    Today also complainant and his advocate are absent when matter is called out.
    Hence dismissed.
    For reason separately recorded.
    Nature Of Disposal: DISMISSED
    Disposal Date: 04-12-2023

    Additional Case Details

    Additional Case Details
    Filing Number: 815249/2018
    Filing Date: 01-12-2018
    First Hearing Date: 19th February 2019
    Decision Date: 04th December 2023
    Court Number And Judge: 44-Judicial Magistrate (First Class), 44th Court

    Orders

    1
    Final Order 1
    04 Dec 2023
    Order Details: Order below Ex-1
    Pdf Text: IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,
    44TH COURT, ANDHERI, MUMBAI.
    C.C. No.4805/SS/2018
    Mr. Sidhesh Sanjay Dalvi, …. Complainant
    V/s.
    Mr. Salmanahmad Rafique Shaikh, …. Accused
    ORDER BELOW EXHIBIT NO.1
    (Passed on 04/12/2023)
    The present case on hand came to be filed under Section 138 of
    the Negotiable Instruments Act.
    2. Having gone through the roznama and case papers, it appears
    that the applicant is absent since long time. Moreover, no positive step was
    taken by the complainant within a span of last five years. Thus, this case is
    unattended. In such circumstances, it appears that the case comes within the
    ambit of stale and ineffective case. Hence, having regard to the pendency of
    the case, it requires to be disposed of in the Special Drive. Resultantly, I pass
    the following order:
    ORDER
    i] The case is dismissed for want of prosecution.
    ii] The original documents filed in this case be returned to the concerned
    parties.
    iii] The case be closed accordingly.
    Sd/
    (Sujitkumar C. Tayde)
    Metropolitan Magistrate,
    Date: 04/12/2023 44th Court, Andheri, Mumbai.
    -- 1 of 1 --

    TrustJury presents public court-record information for legal discovery and reference. Record availability and detail can vary by source and case.